You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 23, 2024

Details for Patent: 5,179,189


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,179,189
Title: Fatty acid terminated polyanhydrides
Abstract:Fatty acid terminated polyanhydrides suitable for use as controlled release matrices in biodegradable sustained release drug delivery systems and methods for making thereof are described. The polymers are more soluble in organic solvents, and have a lower melting point than the corresponding non-fatty acid terminated polyanhydrides. The fatty acid terminated polyanhydrides are also more hydrophobic than the corresponding polyanhydrides that are not terminated with a fatty acid, and combine the properties of thermodynamic and hydrolytic stability, and easy storage. The polymers can be produced with a controlled and low molecular weight. The polyanhydrides are useful in a number of applications, including as a matrix in biodegradable drug delivery systems.
Inventor(s): Domb; Abraham J. (Baltimore, MD), Maniar; Manoj (Baltimore, MD)
Assignee: Nova Pharmaceutical Corporation (Baltimore, MD)
Application Number:07/756,483
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of a Patent: A Detailed Guide Using United States Patent 5,179,189 as an Example

Introduction

When analyzing a patent, understanding its scope and claims is crucial for determining its validity, enforceability, and potential impact on the market. This article will use United States Patent 5,179,189 as an example to illustrate how to conduct a detailed analysis of the scope and claims of a patent.

Understanding Patent Claims

Patent claims are the most critical part of a patent application, as they define the scope of the invention and what is protected by the patent[3].

Types of Claims

  • Independent Claims: These claims stand alone and define the invention without reference to other claims.
  • Dependent Claims: These claims refer back to and further limit an independent claim.
  • Method Claims: These claims describe a process or method.
  • Apparatus Claims: These claims describe a device or system.

Locating and Accessing the Patent

To analyze a patent, you first need to locate and access it. Here are some resources to help you do so:

Using USPTO Resources

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) provides several tools for searching and accessing patents. You can use the Patent Public Search tool, which offers modern interfaces to search prior art and access patent documents[1].

Global Dossier

For patents with international filings, the Global Dossier service allows you to view the patent family, including related applications from participating IP Offices, along with dossier, classification, and citation data[1].

Analyzing the Patent Scope

Reading the Patent Specification

The specification of the patent provides a detailed description of the invention, including drawings and examples. It is essential to read this section carefully to understand the context and limitations of the claims.

Claim Coverage Matrix

A Claim Coverage Matrix can help you identify which patents and claims are actively protecting your intellectual property and where gaps or opportunities exist. This matrix categorizes patents by claims and scope concepts, making it easier to analyze large numbers of patent claims[3].

Example: United States Patent 5,179,189

Let's consider United States Patent 5,179,189 as an example. Here is how you would analyze its scope and claims:

Patent Title and Abstract

Start by reading the title and abstract of the patent to get a general idea of what the invention is about.

Claims Analysis

  • Independent Claims: Identify the independent claims, which are typically broader and more general.
  • Dependent Claims: Analyze the dependent claims to see how they further limit the independent claims.
  • Claim Language: Pay close attention to the language used in the claims. Words like "comprising," "consisting of," and "including" can significantly affect the scope of the claim.

Scope Concepts

Categorize the claims by scope concepts to link similar claims and understand the overall patent landscape. This helps in identifying gaps in coverage and potential future design opportunities[3].

Evaluating Claim Validity

Prior Art Search

Conduct a thorough prior art search to ensure that the claims are novel and non-obvious. Use resources like the Patent Public Search tool, Global Dossier, and international patent databases to find relevant prior art[1].

Written Description and Enablement

Ensure that the claims are supported by a sufficient written description and enablement in the patent specification. This means that the specification must describe the invention in enough detail so that a person of ordinary skill in the field could make and use the invention[5].

Patent Landscape Analysis

Competitor Patents

Analyze competitor patents to understand the broader patent landscape. This includes identifying overlapping claims, potential infringement issues, and areas where your patent provides unique protection.

International Filings

If the patent has international filings, use the Global Dossier service to view the patent family and related applications. This helps in understanding the global scope of protection[1].

Tools and Resources for Patent Analysis

Patent Analytics Software

Utilize patent analytics software like ClaimScape® to generate interactive claim charts. These charts help in reviewing patent coverage with technical experts and identifying gaps or opportunities in your current coverage[3].

USPTO Datasets

The USPTO provides datasets like the Patent Claims Research Dataset, which contains detailed information on claims from US patents and applications. These datasets can be used to analyze claim-level statistics and document-level statistics, providing insights into patent scope and trends[2].

Case Law and Legal Considerations

Obviousness-Type Double Patenting

Ensure that the claims do not fall under obviousness-type double patenting, where claims in a later patent are not patentably distinct from earlier claims. This was a key issue in cases like Allergan USA, Inc. v. MSN Laboratories Private Ltd.[5].

Written Description and Lack of Enablement

Claims must be supported by a sufficient written description and enablement. Failure to meet these requirements can lead to claims being invalidated, as seen in the Allergan case[5].

Key Takeaways

  • Thorough Claims Analysis: Understand the types of claims and their language to determine the scope of protection.
  • Prior Art Search: Conduct a comprehensive prior art search to ensure novelty and non-obviousness.
  • Patent Landscape: Analyze competitor patents and international filings to understand the broader patent landscape.
  • Use of Tools and Resources: Utilize patent analytics software and USPTO datasets to enhance your analysis.
  • Legal Considerations: Ensure claims meet written description and enablement requirements and avoid obviousness-type double patenting.

FAQs

Q: How do I access a specific patent document?

A: You can use the USPTO's Patent Public Search tool or visit the USPTO Public Search Facility to access patent documents[1].

Q: What is the importance of a Claim Coverage Matrix?

A: A Claim Coverage Matrix helps identify which patents and claims are actively protecting your intellectual property and where gaps or opportunities exist[3].

Q: How do I ensure that my patent claims are valid?

A: Conduct a thorough prior art search, ensure sufficient written description and enablement, and avoid obviousness-type double patenting[1][5].

Q: What tools can I use for patent analytics?

A: You can use software like ClaimScape® and datasets provided by the USPTO, such as the Patent Claims Research Dataset[2][3].

Q: Why is it important to analyze the patent landscape?

A: Analyzing the patent landscape helps in understanding competitor patents, identifying potential infringement issues, and finding areas for innovation and protection[1][3].

Sources

  1. USPTO - Search for patents: https://www.uspto.gov/patents/search
  2. USPTO - Patent Claims Research Dataset: https://www.uspto.gov/ip-policy/economic-research/research-datasets/patent-claims-research-dataset
  3. SLWIP - Patent Analytics: https://www.slwip.com/services/patent-analytics/
  4. U.S. Department of Commerce - U.S. Patent and Trademark Office: https://www.commerce.gov/bureaus-and-offices/uspto
  5. CAFC - Allergan USA, Inc. v. MSN Laboratories Private Ltd.: https://cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions-orders/24-1061.OPINION.8-13-2024_2366074.pdf

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,179,189

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.