You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 5,563,175


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,563,175
Title: GABA and L-glutamic acid analogs for antiseizure treatment
Abstract:A compound of the formula ##STR1## wherein R.sub.1 is a straight or branched alkyl group having from 1 to 6 carbon atoms, phenyl, or cycloalkyl having from 3 to 6 carbon atoms; R.sub.2 is hydrogen or methyl; and R.sub.3 is hydrogen, methyl or carboxyl; which is useful in the treatment of seizure disorders. Processes are disclosed for the preparation of the compound. Intermediates prepared during the synthesis of the compound are also disclosed.
Inventor(s): Silverman; Richard B. (Morton Grove, IL), Andruszkiewicz; Ryszard (Sopot, PL), Yuen; Po-Wai (Ann Arbor, MI), Sobieray; Denis M. (Holland, MI), Franklin; Lloyd C. (Hamilton, MI), Schwindt; Mark A. (Holland, MI)
Assignee: Northwestern University (Evanston, IL) Warner-Lambert Company (Ann Arbor, MI)
Application Number:08/420,575
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

United States Patent 5,563,175: A Detailed Analysis of Scope and Claims

Introduction

The United States Patent 5,563,175, one of the patents associated with Pfizer's Lyrica® (pregabalin), is a crucial component in the patent landscape of pharmaceuticals, particularly for drugs treating seizures and certain types of pain. This article delves into the scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape surrounding this patent.

Background of the Patent

The U.S. Patent 5,563,175 is listed in the Orange Book for Lyrica®, a drug developed by Pfizer. This patent, along with others such as U.S. Patent 6,197,819 and U.S. Reissue Patent 41,920, was central to a significant patent litigation case involving generic drug manufacturers[2][5].

Claims and Scope

Claim Construction

The patent claims are critical in defining the scope of protection. In the case of U.S. Patent 5,563,175, the claims were scrutinized during the litigation involving Pfizer and several generic drug manufacturers. The Federal Circuit's decision highlighted the importance of claim construction, particularly in distinguishing between the claimed invention and prior art[1][2].

Specific Claims

While the detailed claim language of U.S. Patent 5,563,175 is not explicitly outlined in the available sources, it is part of a broader patent strategy that includes claims related to the active ingredient pregabalin and its various forms. The focus on specific claims, such as claim 2 of the related U.S. Patent 6,197,819, which recites "3-isobutylGABA" or its pharmaceutically acceptable salts, illustrates the precision and breadth of these patents[2].

Patent Landscape and Litigation

Litigation Overview

The litigation surrounding U.S. Patent 5,563,175 and other related patents involved multiple generic drug manufacturers, including Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Lupin, Ltd., and others. These companies had filed Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs) seeking FDA approval to market generic versions of Lyrica®. Pfizer and its affiliates sued these companies under 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(2)(A), alleging patent infringement[1][2].

Federal Circuit Decision

The Federal Circuit upheld the district court's decision, affirming the validity of the patents against challenges of enablement, written description, and obviousness. The court's decision was significant in reinforcing the patent protection for Lyrica®, preventing generic versions from entering the market until the expiration of the relevant patents, specifically until December 30, 2018[1][2].

Patent Scope and Breadth

Metrics for Measuring Patent Scope

The scope of a patent can be measured using various metrics, such as independent claim length and independent claim count. These metrics can indicate the breadth and clarity of the patent claims. For instance, narrower claims at publication are associated with a higher probability of grant and a shorter examination process, as observed in studies on patent scope[3].

Orange Book Listings

The U.S. Patent 5,563,175 is listed in the FDA's Orange Book, which compiles patent information for approved drug products. This listing is crucial as it informs potential generic manufacturers about the patent landscape and exclusivities associated with the drug, helping them navigate the regulatory and legal environment[4].

Impact on Generic Competition

Exclusivity and Generic Launch

The patent protection afforded by U.S. Patent 5,563,175 and related patents delayed the entry of generic versions of Lyrica® into the market. The study by the USPTO and FDA highlights that market exclusivity for such drugs can range from about 3 to 16 years, significantly impacting the timing of generic competition[4].

Economic and Regulatory Implications

The prolonged exclusivity period due to robust patent protection can have significant economic implications, affecting drug prices and access to medications. The Executive Order on Promoting Competition in the American Economy emphasizes the need to promote generic drug and biosimilar competition to lower drug prices and improve access[4].

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Claims and Scope: The U.S. Patent 5,563,175 is part of a comprehensive patent strategy that includes precise claims defining the scope of protection for Lyrica®.
  • Litigation and Validation: The Federal Circuit's decision upheld the validity of the patent against various challenges, reinforcing Pfizer's patent protection.
  • Impact on Generic Competition: The patent delayed the entry of generic versions, highlighting the significant role of patent protection in the pharmaceutical industry.
  • Regulatory Environment: The Orange Book listings and regulatory requirements play a crucial role in navigating the patent landscape for drug manufacturers.

FAQs

  1. What is the significance of U.S. Patent 5,563,175 in the context of Lyrica®?

    • U.S. Patent 5,563,175 is one of the key patents listed in the Orange Book for Lyrica®, providing significant patent protection for the drug.
  2. How did the Federal Circuit's decision impact generic drug manufacturers?

    • The Federal Circuit's decision prevented generic drug manufacturers from commercially manufacturing, using, offering for sale, or selling their proposed generic versions of Lyrica® until the expiration of the relevant patents.
  3. What metrics can be used to measure the scope of a patent?

    • Metrics such as independent claim length and independent claim count can be used to measure the scope and breadth of a patent.
  4. How does the Orange Book listing affect generic drug competition?

    • The Orange Book listing informs generic manufacturers about the patent landscape and exclusivities, helping them understand when they can enter the market with generic versions.
  5. What are the economic implications of prolonged patent protection for drugs like Lyrica®?

    • Prolonged patent protection can delay generic competition, potentially keeping drug prices higher and affecting access to medications.

Sources

  1. Pfizer Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. - Casetext
  2. Federal Circuit Upholds Lyrica Patents - vLex
  3. Patent Claims and Patent Scope - SSRN
  4. USPTO-FDA Report on Drug Patent and Exclusivity - USPTO
  5. Federal Circuit Upholds Lyrica Patents - Foley & Lardner LLP

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,563,175

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 5,563,175

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 0641330 ⤷  Subscribe 91112 Luxembourg ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 0641330 ⤷  Subscribe 300164 Netherlands ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 0641330 ⤷  Subscribe SPC/GB04/034 United Kingdom ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 0641330 ⤷  Subscribe CA 2004 00036 Denmark ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 0641330 ⤷  Subscribe SPC016/2004 Ireland ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 0641330 ⤷  Subscribe C00641330/01 Switzerland ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.