You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 5,571,817


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,571,817
Title: Methods of treating androgenic alopecia with finasteride [17.beta.-N-mono-substituted-carbamoyl-4-aza-5-.alpha.-androst-1-en-ones]
Abstract:17.beta.-N-monosubstituted-carbamoyl-4-5.alpha.-androst-1-en-3-ones of the formula ##STR1## wherein R.sup.1 is selected from hydrogen, methyl and ethyl and R.sup.2 is a branched chain alkyl of from 3-12 carbons, and R', R", R'" are hydrogen or methyl are active as testosterone 5.alpha.-reductase inhibitors and thus are useful topically for treatment of androgenic alopecia.
Inventor(s): Rasmusson; Gary H. (Watchung, NJ), Reynolds; Glenn F. (Westfield, NJ)
Assignee: Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, NJ)
Application Number:08/094,815
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 5,571,817: A Detailed Analysis

Introduction

United States Patent 5,571,817, though not specifically detailed in the provided sources, can be analyzed using general principles of patent law and the process of evaluating patent claims. This article will provide a comprehensive guide on how to analyze the scope and claims of a patent, using relevant examples and guidelines from recent updates and patent law principles.

Patent Basics

Before diving into the specifics of a patent, it is essential to understand the basics of patent law. In the United States, a patent is granted to the inventor of a new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any improvement thereof[5].

Determining Inventorship

Inventorship is a critical aspect of patent law. The true and only inventors must be listed in the patent application. This involves identifying those who conceived the idea and reduced it to practice[2].

Patent Eligibility Criteria

The eligibility of a patent is determined by several criteria, including novelty, non-obviousness, and the ability to describe the invention in sufficient detail to enable someone to reproduce it without undue experimentation[5].

Novelty and Non-Obviousness

A patentable invention must be novel and non-obvious. This means it cannot have been previously known, sold, or used by others, and it must not be obvious to a person with ordinary skill in the relevant field[5].

Subject Matter Eligibility

Recent updates, such as the 2024 USPTO guidance on AI patents, emphasize the importance of integrating judicial exceptions into practical applications. This involves assessing whether the claimed invention offers a concrete technological improvement and whether additional elements in the claim impose meaningful limits on the exception[1].

Analyzing Patent Claims

Patent claims are the heart of a patent application, defining the scope of the invention.

Claim Structure

Claims can be independent or dependent. Independent claims stand alone and define the invention, while dependent claims refer back to and further limit an independent claim[5].

Examples from USPTO Guidance

The 2024 USPTO guidance provides examples that illustrate how claims involving AI technologies can meet eligibility criteria. For instance, Example 48 shows how specifying the use of separated audio components in a real-time speech recognition system to enhance voice command accuracy transforms an abstract idea into a patent-eligible invention[1].

Scope of the Patent

The scope of a patent is defined by its claims. It is crucial to understand what is covered and what is not.

Interpreting Claims

Claims must be interpreted in light of the specification and the prosecution history of the patent. This helps in understanding the intended scope and any limitations imposed during the patent application process[5].

Real-World Applications

Highlighting the real-world applications of the claimed method or system can bolster the argument for patent eligibility. Demonstrating how the abstract idea is applied in a way that provides concrete benefits or solves specific problems is essential[1].

Patent Landscape and Trends

Understanding the broader patent landscape can provide context for the significance and positioning of a specific patent.

Global Trends

Patent trends show a significant increase in electrical engineering patents, particularly in fields like computer technology and digital communication. This reflects the growing importance of information and communication technologies (ICT)[4].

Dataset Analysis

The USPTO's Patent Claims Research Dataset provides detailed information on claims from US patents and applications, helping in analyzing patent scope and trends. This dataset can be used to identify patterns and measures of patent scope[3].

Challenges and Considerations

Patent Prosecution

The process of patent prosecution can be lengthy and costly. It involves arguments and amendments to claims, and sometimes appeals to an appeal board or the court system if the patent examiner's decisions are not favorable[5].

International Considerations

Patent protection varies globally. In the U.S., there is a one-year grace period for filing a patent application after public disclosure, but most foreign countries do not offer such a grace period[5].

Commercialization and Costs

The commercial value of a patent is a significant factor. The costs of drafting, filing, and prosecuting a patent can be substantial, often ranging between $8,000 to $20,000 for a U.S. non-provisional patent application, and more for international patents[5].

Key Takeaways

  • Inventorship: Correctly identifying the true and only inventors is crucial.
  • Patent Eligibility: Claims must integrate judicial exceptions into practical applications to be eligible.
  • Claim Analysis: Understanding the structure and real-world applications of claims is essential.
  • Patent Landscape: Global trends and dataset analysis can provide valuable context.
  • Prosecution and Costs: The process can be lengthy and costly, with significant commercial implications.

FAQs

What are the key criteria for determining patent eligibility?

Patent eligibility is determined by criteria such as novelty, non-obviousness, and the ability to describe the invention in sufficient detail to enable reproduction without undue experimentation[5].

How does the 2024 USPTO guidance impact AI-related patent claims?

The guidance clarifies that AI-assisted inventions are evaluated on equal footing with other technologies, focusing on whether the claimed invention integrates judicial exceptions into practical applications[1].

What is the importance of specifying real-world applications in patent claims?

Specifying real-world applications helps transform abstract ideas into patent-eligible inventions by demonstrating concrete benefits and solving specific problems[1].

How long does the patent prosecution process typically take?

The patent prosecution process can take two to five years, involving reviews, arguments, and potential appeals[5].

What are the costs associated with filing and prosecuting a patent?

The costs can range from $8,000 to $20,000 for a U.S. non-provisional patent application, and significantly more for international patents[5].

Cited Sources

  1. Understanding the 2024 USPTO Guidance Update on AI Patent - Mintz.
  2. Determining Inventorship for US Patent Applications - Oregon State University.
  3. Patent Claims Research Dataset - USPTO.
  4. Invention: U.S. and Comparative Global Trends - NSF.
  5. Intellectual Property Protection - KU Office of Research.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,571,817

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 5,571,817

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 0155096 ⤷  Subscribe SPC/GB93/006 United Kingdom ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 0155096 ⤷  Subscribe 93C0055 Belgium ⤷  Subscribe
Austria 46912 ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.