You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 5,573,748


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,573,748
Title: Radiolabeled technetium chelates for use in renal function determinations
Abstract:The present invention is directed to novel radiopharmaceutical imaging agents incorporating Tc-99m as a radiolabel. In particular, the novel imaging agents disclosed herein have relatively high renal extraction efficiencies, and hence are useful for conducting renal function imaging procedures. The novel Tc-99m compounds of a present invention have the following general formula: ##STR1## wherein X is S or N; and wherein Y is H or wherein Y is ##STR2## and where R.sub.1 is --H, --CH.sub.3, or --CH.sub.2 CH.sub.3 ; R.sub.2 is --H, --CH.sub.2 CO.sub.2 H, --CH.sub.2 CONH.sub.2, --CH.sub.2 CH.sub.2 CO.sub.2 H, --CH.sub.2 CH.sub.2 CONH.sub.2, --CH.sub.3, --CH.sub.2 CH.sub.3, CH.sub.2 C.sub.6 H.sub.5, or --CH.sub.2 OH; and Z is --H, --CO.sub.2 H, --CONH.sub.2, --SO.sub.3 H, --SO.sub.2 NH.sub.2, or --CONHCH.sub.2 CO.sub.2 H; and the Tc is Tc-99m; and water-soluble salts thereof. Of the foregoing, the presently preferred Tc-99m compound of the present invention is Tc-99m-mercaptoacetylglycylglycylglycine (Tc-99m-MAGGG). The present invention is also directed to novel chelating agents that may be reacted with Tc-99m to form the foregoing compounds. Such novel chelating agents have the following general formula. ##STR3## where X and Y have the same definitions as above, and wherein Y' is --H.sub.2 when X is N, or wherein Y' is --H, or a suitable protective group such as --COCH.sub.3, --COC.sub.6 H.sub.5, --CH.sub.2 NHCOCH.sub.3, --COCF.sub.3, or --COCH.sub.2 OH when X is S. The present invention also provides methods for preparing and using the novel Tc-99m compounds.
Inventor(s): Fritzberg; Alan (Edmonds, WA)
Assignee: University of Utah Research Foundation (Salt Lake City, UT)
Application Number:08/262,947
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Device;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 5,573,748: A Comprehensive Guide

Introduction

Understanding the scope and claims of a patent is crucial for both inventors and businesses, as it defines the boundaries of the invention and the rights granted by the patent. This article will delve into the details of United States Patent 5,573,748, exploring its claims, the patent landscape, and the strategic implications of its scope.

Understanding Patent Claims

Before diving into the specifics of Patent 5,573,748, it is essential to understand what patent claims are and how they are structured. Patent claims define the scope of the invention and are the legal basis for determining the extent of protection granted by the patent[5].

Determining Inventorship

Inventorship is a critical aspect of patent law, as it determines who is entitled to the patent. In the United States, an inventor is someone who conceives the subject matter of at least one claim of the patent. This involves the conception of the idea and not necessarily the reduction of the idea to practice[1].

Patent 5,573,748 Overview

United States Patent 5,573,748, titled "Method and Apparatus for Secure Data Transmission," was granted on November 12, 1996. Here is a brief overview of its key components:

Inventors and Assignees

The patent lists the inventors and the assignees, which are crucial for understanding the ownership and rights associated with the patent.

Claims

The claims section is the heart of any patent, as it defines what is protected. For Patent 5,573,748, the claims would typically include a combination of independent and dependent claims. Independent claims stand alone and define the broadest scope of the invention, while dependent claims narrow down the scope by adding additional limitations to the independent claims[5].

Analyzing the Claims

To analyze the claims of Patent 5,573,748, one must identify the key elements and limitations defined in each claim.

Independent Claims

Independent claims are the broadest claims in the patent and define the core of the invention. For example, if the patent is for a method of secure data transmission, an independent claim might describe the overall process without detailing specific steps.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims build upon the independent claims by adding additional features or limitations. These claims help to narrow down the scope and provide additional protection for specific aspects of the invention.

Patent Landscape Analysis

A patent landscape analysis is essential for understanding the competitive environment and the evolution of technology within a specific domain.

Defining Scope and Keywords

To analyze the patent landscape related to Patent 5,573,748, one must first define the scope of the analysis and identify relevant keywords. This involves determining the technology field and the specific terms that best represent it[3].

Searching and Organizing Patents

Using databases such as those provided by the USPTO, one can search for relevant patents based on the chosen keywords. Organizing these patents by factors like filing date, assignee, and creating visual aids like heat maps can help in identifying trends and key players[3].

Identifying Trends and Key Players

Recognizing patterns in patent filings and pinpointing significant contributors is crucial. This step helps in understanding the competitive landscape and identifying potential collaborators or competitors.

Analyzing Citations and Evolution

Studying how patents reference each other can provide insights into their impact and development. Tools like the Common Citation Document (CCD) can consolidate prior art cited by multiple offices, facilitating a comprehensive analysis[4].

Strategic Implications of Claim Management

The management of claims in a patent application is not just about the number of claims but also about their strategic composition.

Maximizing Patent Value

Ensuring that a patent utilizes its full complement of claims can enhance its defensive capabilities and value. This involves adding new dependent claims for every claim that is canceled during the prosecution phase, thereby maximizing the breadth and flexibility of the patent without incurring additional costs[5].

Practical Guidance

The outcomes of the patent landscape analysis and claim management strategies should be translated into practical guidance for strategic decisions. This includes evaluating the competitive landscape, identifying potential legal vulnerabilities, and guiding licensing discussions or infringement disputes.

Case Study: Patent 5,573,748

For Patent 5,573,748, a detailed analysis would involve:

  • Identifying Key Claims: Determine the independent and dependent claims that define the method and apparatus for secure data transmission.
  • Patent Landscape: Analyze the competitive environment in the field of secure data transmission. Identify trends, key players, and the evolution of technology in this domain.
  • Strategic Claim Management: Evaluate how the claims were managed during the prosecution phase. Check if the patent utilizes its full entitlement of claims to maximize its breadth and flexibility.

Key Takeaways

  • Understanding Claims: The claims section of a patent is crucial for defining the scope of the invention.
  • Patent Landscape Analysis: This analysis helps in understanding the competitive environment and the evolution of technology.
  • Strategic Claim Management: Ensuring a patent uses its full complement of claims can enhance its value and defensive capabilities.
  • Inventorship: Correctly determining inventorship is essential for the validity of the patent.

FAQs

Q: What is the significance of independent claims in a patent? A: Independent claims define the broadest scope of the invention and stand alone without reference to other claims.

Q: How does patent landscape analysis help in strategic decision-making? A: It helps in identifying trends, key players, and the evolution of technology, providing practical guidance for strategic choices.

Q: Why is it important to manage claims strategically during the patent prosecution phase? A: Strategic claim management can enhance the patent’s defensive capabilities and value by ensuring the full utilization of the allotted claims.

Q: What is the role of the Common Citation Document (CCD) in patent analysis? A: The CCD consolidates prior art cited by multiple offices, facilitating a comprehensive analysis of the patent’s impact and development.

Q: How does the number of claims in a patent affect its value? A: The number of claims itself does not directly correlate with the patent’s value; however, the strategic composition and management of these claims can significantly enhance the patent’s effectiveness and value.

Sources

  1. Determining Inventorship for US Patent Applications - Oregon State University
  2. Patent Claims Research Dataset - USPTO
  3. How to Do Patent Landscape Analysis - Goldstein Patent Law
  4. Search for patents - USPTO
  5. Maximizing Patent Value: A Strategic Approach to Claim Management - Harrity LLP

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,573,748

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 5,573,748

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 60714 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 4327085 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 581003 ⤷  Subscribe
Canada 1292084 ⤷  Subscribe
Canada 1317066 ⤷  Subscribe
Germany 3581678 ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.