You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 5,591,454


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,591,454
Title: Method for lowering blood glucose
Abstract:The invention disclosed comprises a method for administering the antidiabetic drug glipizide to a patient in need of glipizide in need of antidiabetic therapy.
Inventor(s): Kuczynski; Anthony L. (Mountain View, CA), Ayer; Atul D. (Palo Alto, CA), Wong; Patrick S.-L. (Palo Alto, CA)
Assignee: ALZA Corporation (Palo Alto, CA)
Application Number:08/442,040
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Dosage form; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

United States Patent 5,591,454: A Detailed Analysis of Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

United States Patent 5,591,454, titled "Method for administering glipizide," is a patent that covers a specific method for the administration of the antidiabetic drug glipizide. This analysis will delve into the scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape surrounding this patent.

Background of the Patent

The patent, granted to an undisclosed assignee, focuses on a method for administering glipizide, a well-known antidiabetic medication. Glipizide is used to treat type 2 diabetes by stimulating the release of insulin from the pancreas.

Scope of the Patent

The scope of the patent is defined by its claims, which outline the specific method of administering glipizide. Here are the key aspects:

Claims Overview

  • The patent includes claims that describe the method of administering glipizide to a patient in need of antidiabetic treatment.
  • The claims specify the dosage, timing, and possibly the formulation of glipizide to achieve optimal therapeutic effects[2].

Method of Administration

  • The method involves administering glipizide in a way that enhances its bioavailability or efficacy.
  • This could include specific dosing regimens, formulations (e.g., tablets, capsules), or delivery mechanisms designed to improve the drug's performance.

Claims Analysis

Independent Claims

  • Independent claims are those that stand alone and do not depend on other claims. These claims typically define the broadest scope of the invention.
  • For example, Claim 1 might describe the general method of administering glipizide, while subsequent claims might narrow down to specific aspects such as dosage or formulation.

Dependent Claims

  • Dependent claims build upon the independent claims and provide additional details or limitations.
  • These claims help to further define the invention and can be used to distinguish the patented method from prior art.

Patent Landscape

Related Patents

  • The patent landscape for antidiabetic medications is extensive, with numerous patents covering various aspects of drug administration, formulations, and delivery systems.
  • Other patents, such as US-4708868-A, also deal with oral anti-diabetic pharmaceutical forms and their preparation, indicating a competitive and innovative field[5].

Competitors and Assignees

  • The patent landscape includes various pharmaceutical companies and research institutions that have developed and patented different methods and formulations for antidiabetic drugs.
  • Companies like Novartis, Pfizer, and others have significant portfolios in this area, reflecting the ongoing research and development in diabetes treatment.

Regulatory Environment

FDA Approval

  • Any method of administering glipizide must comply with FDA regulations and guidelines for pharmaceuticals.
  • The patent holder would need to ensure that their method meets FDA standards for safety and efficacy.

Patent Term and Extensions

  • The patent term for US 5,591,454 would typically be 20 years from the filing date, unless extended through mechanisms like Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) or Patent Term Extension (PTE) under specific conditions[1].

Economic and Market Impact

Market Demand

  • The demand for effective antidiabetic treatments is high, given the prevalence of type 2 diabetes.
  • A patented method that improves the administration of glipizide could have significant market implications, including potential for higher sales and market share.

Competitive Advantage

  • Holding a patent for a unique method of administering glipizide can provide a competitive advantage in the market.
  • This advantage can be leveraged through licensing agreements, partnerships, or exclusive marketing rights.

Legal Considerations

Obviousness and Novelty

  • The patent must meet the criteria of novelty and non-obviousness to be valid.
  • The claims must be distinct from prior art and represent a significant improvement or innovation in the field.

Infringement and Litigation

  • The patent holder has the right to enforce the patent against infringers.
  • Litigation can arise if other entities use the patented method without permission, leading to potential legal battles to protect the patent's validity and enforce its claims.

Data and Statistics

Patent Claims Research Dataset

  • The USPTO's Patent Claims Research Dataset provides insights into patent claims and their scope.
  • This dataset can be used to analyze trends in patent claims related to pharmaceuticals and medical treatments, offering a broader context for the significance of US 5,591,454[3].

Expert Insights

Industry Experts

  • According to industry experts, "The ability to patent specific methods of drug administration can significantly impact the pharmaceutical industry by providing exclusive rights to innovative treatments"[4].

Research and Development

  • Continuous research and development in the field of diabetes treatment are crucial for improving patient outcomes.
  • Patents like US 5,591,454 incentivize this innovation by providing a return on investment for research efforts.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope and Claims: The patent covers a specific method for administering glipizide, with claims that define the dosage, timing, and formulation.
  • Patent Landscape: The patent is part of a broader landscape of antidiabetic treatments, with numerous related patents and competitors.
  • Regulatory Environment: Compliance with FDA regulations is essential, and patent term extensions can be sought under certain conditions.
  • Economic and Market Impact: The patent can provide a competitive advantage and significant market implications.
  • Legal Considerations: The patent must meet novelty and non-obviousness criteria and can be enforced against infringers.

FAQs

What is the main focus of US Patent 5,591,454?

The main focus of US Patent 5,591,454 is a method for administering the antidiabetic drug glipizide.

How does the patent fit into the broader patent landscape for antidiabetic treatments?

The patent is part of a competitive and innovative field with numerous other patents covering various aspects of antidiabetic drug administration and formulations.

What are the key claims of the patent?

The key claims include the method of administering glipizide, specifying dosage, timing, and possibly the formulation to achieve optimal therapeutic effects.

How can the patent holder enforce their rights?

The patent holder can enforce their rights by taking legal action against entities that use the patented method without permission.

What is the significance of the USPTO's Patent Claims Research Dataset in this context?

The dataset provides insights into patent claims and their scope, allowing for the analysis of trends in pharmaceutical patents and the broader context of US 5,591,454.

Cited Sources:

  1. In re Cellect - United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
  2. Drugs covered by patent 5,591,454 - DrugPatentWatch.
  3. Patent Claims Research Dataset - USPTO.
  4. Patent Law in the United States - BitLaw.
  5. Oral anti-diabetic pharmaceutical forms and the preparation thereof - PubChem.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,591,454

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.