You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 20, 2025

Details for Patent: 5,616,346


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,616,346
Title: Non-aqueous colonic purgative formulations
Abstract:Orally administered colonic purgative formulations and methods of its use for effecting partial or complete purgation of the colon in mammals, the formulations consisting of non-aqueous admixtures of monobasic, dibasic and tribasic sodium phosphates administered in tablet or capsule form in concentrations of from 0.01 to 0.85 grams per kilogram body weight. Preferred embodiments include the addition of binders, dispersants and buffers which do not adversely affect osmolality or effectiveness of the purgative formulations.
Inventor(s): Aronchick; Craig A. (Penn Valley, PA)
Assignee:
Application Number:08/669,834
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Dosage form; Use; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 5,616,346: A Comprehensive Guide

Introduction

Understanding the scope and claims of a patent is crucial for inventors, patent attorneys, and businesses alike. This article will delve into the details of United States Patent 5,616,346, exploring its background, the process of determining inventorship, the tools and databases used for patent searches, and the economic implications of such patents.

Background of Patent 5,616,346

To begin, let's establish the context of the patent in question. United States Patent 5,616,346, though not specifically detailed here, would typically involve a specific invention or innovation. Patents are granted by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to protect the intellectual property of inventors.

Determining Inventorship

Inventorship is a critical aspect of patent law. According to U.S. patent law, the true and only inventors must be listed on the patent application. This involves a two-step process: the conception of the idea and the reduction of the idea to practice[2].

Conception of the Idea

Conception is the formation of a definite and permanent idea of the invention. This is a mental process and can involve multiple individuals if they collectively contribute to the conception.

Reduction to Practice

Reduction to practice involves either building and testing the invention (actual reduction to practice) or describing the invention in sufficient detail to enable others to make and use it (constructive reduction to practice)[2].

Tools and Databases for Patent Searches

Several tools and databases are available for conducting thorough patent searches, which are essential for understanding the patent landscape.

USPTO Patent Public Search

The USPTO provides the Patent Public Search database, which allows for full-text searching of U.S. patent grants and applications, as well as international patents from over 100 patent offices worldwide[1].

Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)

The CPC database is a powerful tool for finding relevant classification schemes, helping to narrow down searches to specific areas of technology[1].

PATENTSCOPE

PATENTSCOPE, provided by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), offers access to international Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) applications and patent documents from participating national and regional patent offices[1].

Global Dossier

The Global Dossier service by the USPTO allows users to access the file histories of related applications from participating IP Offices, including the IP5 Offices. This service provides a comprehensive view of the patent family and related documents[4].

Analyzing Patent Claims

Patent claims define the scope of the invention and are crucial for determining what is protected by the patent.

Patent Claims Research Dataset

The USPTO's Patent Claims Research Dataset provides detailed information on claims from U.S. patents granted between 1976 and 2014 and U.S. patent applications published between 2001 and 2014. This dataset includes claim-level statistics and document-level statistics, offering insights into the scope and complexity of patent claims[3].

Claim Construction

Claim construction involves interpreting the language of the claims to determine the scope of the patent. This process is critical in patent litigation and can significantly impact the enforceability of a patent.

Economic Implications of Patents

Patents have significant economic value and can be a major asset for companies.

Valuation of Patents

The value of a patent can vary widely. For example, in 2011, a consortium including Apple, BlackBerry, Ericsson, Microsoft, and Sony paid $4.5 billion for 6,000 patent documents from Nortel, valuing each patent document at $750,000[5].

Market Transactions

Patent transactions, such as sales and licensing, are common in the tech industry. These transactions can be complex and involve significant financial considerations. For instance, in 2010, CPTN Holdings paid $450 million to Novell for 882 patents and applications, valuing each patent at $510,204.08[5].

Patent Landscape Analysis

Analyzing the patent landscape involves understanding the existing patents and applications in a particular field.

Common Citation Document (CCD)

The CCD application consolidates prior art cited by participating offices for the family members of a patent application, providing a single point of access to up-to-date citation data. This tool helps in visualizing the search results for the same invention produced by several offices[4].

Patent Examination Data System (PEDS)

PEDS allows public users to search, view, and download bibliographic data for all publicly available patent applications. This system is useful for analyzing the status and trends of patent applications in various fields[4].

Legal Considerations

Correct inventorship and the absence of deceptive intent are crucial for the enforceability of a patent.

Consequences of Incorrect Inventorship

Incorrect or deceptive inventorship can lead to a patent being declared invalid and unenforceable. For example, in the case of Frank’s Casing Crew v. PMR Technologies, the patent was found unenforceable due to the deceptive intent of the individuals who applied for the patent[2].

Best Practices for Patent Searches

Conducting thorough patent searches is essential for several reasons, including ensuring the novelty of an invention and avoiding infringement.

Using Multiple Databases

Utilizing multiple databases such as the USPTO's Patent Public Search, PATENTSCOPE, and the CPC database can provide a comprehensive view of the patent landscape.

Training and Resources

The USPTO offers various training materials and resources, including the Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs), to help users conduct effective patent searches[1][4].

Key Takeaways

  • Inventorship: Correctly identifying the true and only inventors is crucial for the validity and enforceability of a patent.
  • Patent Searches: Utilizing tools like the USPTO's Patent Public Search, PATENTSCOPE, and the CPC database is essential for understanding the patent landscape.
  • Claim Analysis: Analyzing patent claims is vital for determining the scope of protection.
  • Economic Value: Patents can have significant economic value and are often traded in high-stakes transactions.
  • Legal Considerations: Ensuring correct inventorship and avoiding deceptive intent is critical for maintaining the enforceability of a patent.

FAQs

What is the importance of correct inventorship in patent applications?

Correct inventorship is crucial because it ensures the validity and enforceability of the patent. Incorrect or deceptive inventorship can lead to the patent being declared invalid and unenforceable[2].

How can I conduct a thorough patent search?

You can use multiple databases such as the USPTO's Patent Public Search, PATENTSCOPE, and the CPC database. Additionally, resources like the Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs) and training materials from the USPTO can be very helpful[1][4].

What is the economic value of patents?

Patents can have significant economic value. For example, large consortia have paid billions of dollars for portfolios of patents, indicating their high value in the market[5].

What tools are available for analyzing patent claims?

The USPTO's Patent Claims Research Dataset provides detailed information on claims from U.S. patents and applications. This dataset includes claim-level statistics and document-level statistics, which can be used to analyze the scope and complexity of patent claims[3].

Why is the Common Citation Document (CCD) important?

The CCD consolidates prior art cited by participating offices for the family members of a patent application, providing a single point of access to up-to-date citation data. This helps in visualizing the search results for the same invention produced by several offices[4].

Sources

  1. Clemson University Libraries. Research and Course Guides: Patent Searching, Advanced: Overview. Retrieved from https://clemson.libguides.com/advanced_patent_searching
  2. Oregon State University. Determining Inventorship for US Patent Applications. Retrieved from https://agsci.oregonstate.edu/sites/agsci/files/main/research/vrc_release_inventorship-gattari.pdf
  3. United States Patent and Trademark Office. Patent Claims Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://www.uspto.gov/ip-policy/economic-research/research-datasets/patent-claims-research-dataset
  4. United States Patent and Trademark Office. Search for patents. Retrieved from https://www.uspto.gov/patents/search
  5. Perpetual Motion Patents. The value of a patent. Retrieved from https://perpetualmotionpatents.com/the-value-of-a-patent/

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,616,346

ApplicantTradenameGeneric NameDosageNDAApproval DateTETypeRLDRSPatent No.Patent ExpirationProductSubstanceDelist Req.Patented / Exclusive UseSubmissiondate
No data available in table
>Applicant>Tradename>Generic Name>Dosage>NDA>Approval Date>TE>Type>RLD>RS>Patent No.>Patent Expiration>Product>Substance>Delist Req.>Patented / Exclusive Use>Submissiondate
Showing 0 to 0 of 0 entries

International Family Members for US Patent 5,616,346

CountryPatent NumberEstimated ExpirationSupplementary Protection CertificateSPC CountrySPC Expiration
Austria 235894 ⤷  Try for Free
Canada 2241445 ⤷  Try for Free
Denmark 0858326 ⤷  Try for Free
European Patent Office 0858326 ⤷  Try for Free
Germany 69627170 ⤷  Try for Free
Spain 2196149 ⤷  Try for Free
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) 9741838 ⤷  Try for Free
>Country>Patent Number>Estimated Expiration>Supplementary Protection Certificate>SPC Country>SPC Expiration
Showing 1 to 7 of 7 entries

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.