You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 5,631,021


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,631,021
Title: Method for producing microcapsule
Abstract:A microcapsule produced by preparing a water-in-oil emulsion comprising an inner aqueous layer containing said water-soluble drug and a drug retaining substance therefor and an oil layer containing a polymer substance, then thickening or solidifying said inner aqueous layer to a viscosity of not lower than about 5000 centiposes and finally subjecting the resulting emulsion to in water drying gives prolonged release of water-soluble drug.
Inventor(s): Okada; Hiroaki (Osaka, JP), Ogawa; Yasuaki (Osaka, JP), Yashiki; Takatsuka (Hyogo, JP)
Assignee: Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd. (Osaka, JP)
Application Number:08/604,022
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

United States Patent 5,631,021: A Detailed Analysis of Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

United States Patent 5,631,021, hereafter referred to as the '021 patent, is part of a series of patents related to pharmaceutical formulations, particularly those involving lactic acid-glycolic acid copolymers. This patent, owned by Takeda, is crucial in the context of drug delivery systems and has been the subject of several legal disputes. Here, we will delve into the scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape surrounding this patent.

Background and Invention

The '021 patent pertains to a method and composition for delivering drugs, specifically using microcapsules made from lactic acid-glycolic acid copolymers. These copolymers are biodegradable and biocompatible, making them ideal for controlled drug release systems[4].

Claim Scope and Construction

Claim Language and Specification

The claims of the '021 patent are carefully crafted to define the scope of the invention. The patent specifies that the lactic acid-glycolic acid copolymer can be made by various methods, including the ring-opening method of lactide and glycolide. This method involves converting lactic acid and glycolic acid into cyclic dimers, which are then opened by a catalyst to form the copolymer chains[1].

Dependency on Specification

The claims must be anchored to the embodiments described in the specification. The '021 patent provides detailed examples and descriptions of how the drug-retaining substance must be used to ensure the initial viscosity of the inner aqueous layer in the water-in-oil emulsion is sufficient. This ensures that the drug is incorporated efficiently into the microcapsule[1].

Patent Claims and Their Significance

Independent and Dependent Claims

The '021 patent includes both independent and dependent claims. Independent claims define the invention broadly, while dependent claims narrow down the scope by adding specific limitations. For instance, claim 1 might describe the general method of preparing the microcapsules, while dependent claims might specify the comonomer ratio or the method of polymerization[4].

Claim 1 Analysis

Claim 1 of the '021 patent typically sets the foundation for the invention, outlining the essential elements of the microcapsule composition and the method of its preparation. This claim is critical as it defines the broadest scope of protection for the patent[4].

Patent Landscape and Prior Art

Prior Art Considerations

When drafting the claims of the '021 patent, the inventors and patent drafters had to consider prior art in the field of biodegradable polymers and drug delivery systems. The level of prior art in this technical field is significant, making it challenging to obtain broad claims without risking invalidation[3].

Competing Patents and Litigation

The '021 patent has been involved in several litigation cases, particularly against companies like OWL Pharmaceuticals, which sought to market similar drug formulations. These cases highlight the importance of precise claim construction and the need to differentiate the invention from existing prior art[5].

Legal Disputes and Court Decisions

Infringement and Validity

In one notable case, OWL Pharmaceuticals was found to infringe claims of the '021 patent, among others. The court upheld the validity of the '021 patent, rejecting OWL's arguments that the patent was invalid or unenforceable due to inequitable conduct[1].

Claim Construction Disputes

The court's construction of the claims was a pivotal issue. The district court's interpretation that the claims were not limited to copolymers made by direct polymerization but could also be made by the ring-opening method was upheld by the Federal Circuit. This decision underscored the importance of careful claim construction and its impact on patent validity and infringement[1].

Economic and Strategic Implications

Patent Scope and Protection

The scope of the '021 patent affects not only the legal protection it offers but also its economic value. A well-crafted claim scope can provide broad protection while minimizing the risk of invalidation. This is particularly important in highly competitive fields like pharmaceuticals, where patent protection can be a significant competitive advantage[3].

Licensing and Collaboration

The '021 patent's scope also influences licensing and collaboration opportunities. Companies seeking to use similar technologies must either obtain a license or ensure their own inventions do not infringe on the existing patent claims. This can drive innovation through collaborative agreements and licensing deals[3].

Best Practices for Patent Drafting

Balancing Breadth and Specificity

When drafting patent claims, it is crucial to balance breadth with specificity. While broader claims offer more protection, they are also more susceptible to invalidation. The '021 patent illustrates the importance of anchoring claims to specific embodiments described in the specification[3].

Keeping Up with Legal Trends

Patent drafters must stay updated with current legal trends and court decisions. The abstract idea exception, for example, has significantly impacted how claims are drafted to avoid preemption of abstract ideas. This ensures that the claims are not only valid but also enforceable[3].

Key Takeaways

  • Claim Scope: The '021 patent's claim scope is critical and must be carefully constructed to balance breadth and specificity.
  • Claim Construction: The method of claim construction, as seen in the court decisions, significantly affects the patent's validity and infringement.
  • Prior Art: The level of prior art in the field of biodegradable polymers and drug delivery systems is high, making precise claim drafting essential.
  • Legal Disputes: The '021 patent has been involved in significant litigation, highlighting the importance of precise claim construction and differentiation from prior art.
  • Economic Implications: The patent's scope affects its economic value and influences licensing and collaboration opportunities.

FAQs

What is the main invention described in the '021 patent?

The '021 patent describes a method and composition for delivering drugs using microcapsules made from lactic acid-glycolic acid copolymers.

How are the copolymers in the '021 patent typically made?

The copolymers can be made by various methods, including the ring-opening method of lactide and glycolide.

What was the outcome of the litigation involving OWL Pharmaceuticals and the '021 patent?

OWL Pharmaceuticals was found to infringe claims of the '021 patent, and the court upheld the validity of the patent.

Why is claim construction important in patent law?

Claim construction is crucial as it defines the scope of protection for the patent and affects its validity and infringement.

How does the '021 patent impact the pharmaceutical industry?

The '021 patent provides significant protection for Takeda's drug delivery technology, influencing licensing and collaboration opportunities in the pharmaceutical industry.

Sources

  1. U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, "03-1634.pdf" - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
  2. USPTO, "Patent Claims Research Dataset" - USPTO.
  3. Rimon Law, "The Importance of Getting the Claim Scope Right in a US Patent Application" - Rimon Law.
  4. Google Patents, "United States Patent (19) - googleapis.com".
  5. RPX Corporation, "IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN ..." - RPX Corporation.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,631,021

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 5,631,021

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Japan58-207760Nov 04, 1983

International Family Members for US Patent 5,631,021

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 42197 ⤷  Subscribe
Bulgaria 60493 ⤷  Subscribe
Canada 1233414 ⤷  Subscribe
Germany 3477732 ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 0145240 ⤷  Subscribe
Spain 537325 ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.