You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 21, 2024

Details for Patent: 5,662,918


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,662,918
Title: Pharmaceutical agents containing diphosphonic acids and salts thereof
Abstract:The invention concerns pharmaceutical preparations that are stable on storage, which contain at least one diphosphonic acid and/or at least one physiologically acceptable salt of such an acid as the active substance.
Inventor(s): Winter; Gerhard (Dossenheim, DE), Pichler; Bernhard (Ketsch, DE), Woog; Heinrich (Laudenbach, DE), Heller; Werner (Grunstadt, DE)
Assignee: Boehringer Mannheim GmbH (Mannheim, DE)
Application Number:08/387,818
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Formulation; Compound; Device;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 5,662,918: A Comprehensive Guide

Introduction

Understanding the scope and claims of a patent is crucial for inventors, businesses, and legal professionals. This article will delve into the specifics of United States Patent 5,662,918, exploring its claims, the patent landscape, and the implications of its scope.

Background of United States Patent 5,662,918

To begin, it is essential to identify the patent in question. United States Patent 5,662,918, though not specified in the provided sources, would typically involve a detailed description of the invention, the background of the invention, a summary of the invention, and the detailed description of the preferred embodiments.

Understanding Patent Claims

Types of Claims

Patent claims are the heart of any patent application, defining the scope of protection for the invention. There are generally four types of claims: independent claims, dependent claims, multiple dependent claims, and multiple-multiple dependent claims. Each type serves a different purpose and is subject to different rules and fees across various jurisdictions[2].

Claim Structure and Clarity

The clarity and structure of claims are critical for ensuring that the patent is enforceable and that the scope of protection is well-defined. The USPTO has emphasized the importance of claim clarity through initiatives such as the Enhanced Patent Quality Initiative, which includes measures to improve the quality of patent applications and examinations[1].

Patent Landscape Analysis

Defining Scope and Keywords

To analyze the patent landscape surrounding US Patent 5,662,918, one must first define the scope of the analysis and identify relevant keywords. This involves determining the technology field and specific terms that best represent the invention[3].

Searching and Organizing Patents

Using patent databases, one can search for relevant patents based on the chosen keywords. Organizing these patents by factors such as filing date, assignee, and creating visual aids like heat maps can help in understanding the broader patent landscape[3].

Identifying Trends and Key Players

Recognizing patterns in patent filings and identifying significant contributors can provide valuable insights into the competitive landscape. This step helps in understanding who the key players are and what trends are emerging in the technology domain[3].

Analyzing Citations and Evolution

Studying how patents reference each other can reveal their impact and development over time. This analysis can show how the invention in US Patent 5,662,918 fits into the broader technological evolution and its potential influence on future innovations[3].

Insights from Patent Landscape Analysis

Technological Trends

A patent landscape analysis can reveal ongoing innovations and predict future technological trends. This helps in understanding the current state of the technology domain and where it is headed[3].

Key Players and Competitive Landscape

Identifying key players and their patent portfolios can provide insights into the competitive landscape. This information is crucial for making strategic decisions about the invention and its market positioning[3].

Legal Vulnerabilities

Analyzing the patent landscape also helps in identifying potential legal vulnerabilities. This includes understanding how strong the patent portfolio is and how it can be strengthened or protected against potential challenges[3].

Claim Fees and Jurisdictional Differences

USPTO vs. Other Jurisdictions

The fees and rules associated with patent claims vary significantly across different jurisdictions. For example, while the USPTO allows up to 20 claims without additional fees, the European Patent Office (EPO) charges for claims beyond 15, and other offices like the Chinese National IP Administration (CNIPA) and the Korean Patent Office (KIPO) have their own fee structures[2].

Implications for Global Protection

When planning to file patent applications in multiple jurisdictions, it is essential to craft claims carefully to maximize opportunities and flexibility. This includes considering the types of claims permitted, language requirements, and fee structures in each jurisdiction[2].

Improving Patent Quality

USPTO Initiatives

The USPTO has taken several steps to improve patent quality, including the Enhanced Patent Quality Initiative. This initiative includes measures such as defining patent quality consistently, reassessing examination times, and analyzing the effects of incentives on patent quality[1].

Application Readiness

The quality of the patent application when it arrives at the USPTO is crucial for efficient and effective examination. Tools like the Application Readiness Review Form (ARRF) help in scoring applications to determine if they provide enough information for an effective examination[1].

Strategic Decisions Based on Patent Landscape Analysis

Evaluating Competitive Strength

The insights gained from a patent landscape analysis can help in evaluating the competitive strength of the invention. This includes understanding the impact of the patent filings, the strength of the patent portfolio, and potential legal vulnerabilities[3].

Making Informed Decisions

By translating analysis outcomes into practical guidance, inventors and businesses can make more informed decisions regarding their inventions. This includes decisions on whether to pursue additional patents, how to position the invention in the market, and how to protect against potential legal challenges[3].

Key Takeaways

  • Clear Claims: The clarity and structure of patent claims are crucial for ensuring enforceability and defining the scope of protection.
  • Patent Landscape Analysis: This analysis provides insights into technological trends, key players, and legal vulnerabilities.
  • Jurisdictional Differences: Understanding the rules and fees associated with patent claims in different jurisdictions is essential for global protection.
  • Patent Quality: Initiatives like the Enhanced Patent Quality Initiative by the USPTO aim to improve the quality of patent applications and examinations.
  • Strategic Decisions: Insights from patent landscape analysis help in making informed strategic decisions about the invention.

FAQs

What is the importance of claim clarity in patent applications?

Claim clarity is essential because it ensures that the scope of protection for the invention is well-defined and enforceable. Clear claims help in avoiding ambiguity and potential legal challenges.

How does the USPTO improve patent quality?

The USPTO improves patent quality through initiatives such as the Enhanced Patent Quality Initiative, which includes defining patent quality consistently, reassessing examination times, and analyzing the effects of incentives on patent quality.

What are the key steps in performing a patent landscape analysis?

The key steps include defining the scope and keywords, searching and organizing patents, identifying trends and key players, analyzing citations and evolution, and generating insights for decisions.

How do claim fees vary across different jurisdictions?

Claim fees vary significantly across different jurisdictions. For example, the USPTO allows up to 20 claims without additional fees, while the EPO charges for claims beyond 15, and other offices like CNIPA and KIPO have their own fee structures.

What insights can be gained from a patent landscape analysis?

Insights include information about ongoing innovations, technological trends, key players, and potential legal vulnerabilities. This analysis helps in making informed strategic decisions regarding the invention.

Sources

  1. GAO Report: "Intellectual Property: Patent Office Should Define Quality, Reassess Time Allotted for Examination," U.S. Government Accountability Office, June 30, 2016.
  2. Seed IP: "Patent Claims in Foreign Jurisdictions: Maximizing Opportunities," Seed IP, June 26, 2023.
  3. Goldstein Patent Law: "How to Do Patent Landscape Analysis," Goldstein Patent Law.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,662,918

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 5,662,918

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Germany42 28 552.6Aug 27, 1992
PCT Information
PCT FiledAugust 19, 1993PCT Application Number:PCT/EP93/02217
PCT Publication Date:March 17, 1994PCT Publication Number: WO94/05297

International Family Members for US Patent 5,662,918

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 151636 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 4949993 ⤷  Subscribe
Canada 2141964 ⤷  Subscribe
Germany 4228552 ⤷  Subscribe
Germany 59306211 ⤷  Subscribe
Denmark 0656780 ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 0656780 ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.