You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 2, 2025

Details for Patent: 5,688,530


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,688,530
Title: Sustained release formulations of water soluble peptides
Abstract:The invention discloses microparticles comprising a polypeptide, preferably somatostatin or an analog or derivative thereof, more preferably octreotide, in a polymeric matrix, preferably poly(lactide-co-glycolide) glucose. The invention also discloses sustained release formulations containing said microparticles and the use of said formulations in treating acromegaly and breast cancer.
Inventor(s): Bodmer; David (Klingnau, CH), Fong; Jones W. (Parsippany, NJ), Kissel; Thomas (Staufen, DE), Maulding; Hawkins V. (Mendham, NJ), Nagele; Oskar (Sissach, CH), Pearson; Jane E. (Ogendensburg, NJ)
Assignee: Novartis AG (Basel, CH)
Application Number:08/470,909
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 5,688,530: A Comprehensive Guide

Introduction

When delving into the world of patents, understanding the scope and claims of a particular patent is crucial for inventors, businesses, and legal professionals. This article will provide a detailed analysis of the scope and claims of United States Patent 5,688,530, although the specific details of this patent are not provided in the sources. We will, however, use general principles and guidelines to illustrate how to analyze a patent's scope and claims.

Understanding Patent Claims

Patent claims are the heart of any patent application, defining the scope of protection granted to the inventor. These claims must be carefully crafted to ensure they are neither too broad nor too narrow, as this can affect the patent's validity and enforceability[3].

Types of Patent Claims

  • Independent Claims: These claims stand alone and define the invention without reference to other claims.
  • Dependent Claims: These claims refer back to and further limit an independent claim.
  • Method Claims: Describe a process or method of achieving a particular result.
  • Apparatus Claims: Describe a physical device or system.
  • Composition of Matter Claims: Describe a new chemical compound or material[5].

The Importance of Claim Scope

The scope of patent claims is critical because it determines the breadth of protection the patent offers. A common misconception is that broader claims are always better, but this is not the case. Broader claims can be more difficult to get granted and are easier to invalidate due to prior art or abstract idea exceptions[3].

Analyzing the Claim Scope of a Patent

To analyze the claim scope of a patent like 5,688,530, you need to consider several factors:

Specific Embodiments

Claims must be anchored to the specific embodiments described in the patent specification. Overly broad claims that go beyond the disclosed embodiments risk being invalidated for failing to meet the written description requirement or for being too abstract[3].

Prior Art

The level of prior art in the technical field can significantly impact the claim scope. In fields with extensive prior art, broader claims are more likely to be rejected or invalidated[3].

Client’s Budget and Technical Field

The client’s budget and the complexity of the technical field also influence the claim scope. More complex fields or those with high litigation risks may require more narrowly defined claims to avoid costly disputes[3].

Patent-Eligible Subject Matter

Patent claims must comply with Section 101 of the Patent Act, which defines patent-eligible subject matter. This includes processes, machines, manufactures, and compositions of matter. However, certain concepts like abstract ideas, mental processes, and purely natural processes are excluded unless they contain an inventive concept that transforms the nature of the claim[5].

The Alice/Mayo Framework

The Alice/Mayo framework is a critical consideration for determining patent-eligible subject matter. This framework involves a two-step test:

  • Step One: Determine if the claim is directed to an ineligible concept.
  • Step Two: If it is, determine if the claim elements, both individually and as an ordered combination, contain an inventive concept that transforms the nature of the claim[5].

Impact of Recent Judicial and Legislative Developments

Recent judicial decisions and legislative proposals can significantly affect the interpretation of patent-eligible subject matter. For example, the Alice decision and subsequent cases have led to increased scrutiny of claims involving abstract ideas and AI technologies. Legislative proposals like the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act of 2023 aim to clarify and potentially narrow the categories of ineligible subject matter[5].

Searching and Analyzing Patent Data

To analyze a patent's scope and claims effectively, one must have access to comprehensive patent data. Tools like the USPTO's Public Search Facility, Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs), and the Global Dossier service provide valuable resources for searching and analyzing patent applications and granted patents[4].

Key Takeaways

  • Claim Scope: The scope of patent claims is crucial and must be balanced between being too broad and too narrow.
  • Patent-Eligible Subject Matter: Claims must comply with Section 101 of the Patent Act and avoid ineligible concepts unless they contain an inventive concept.
  • Prior Art and Technical Field: The level of prior art and the complexity of the technical field influence the claim scope.
  • Judicial and Legislative Developments: Recent decisions and proposals can impact the interpretation of patent-eligible subject matter.
  • Access to Patent Data: Utilizing tools like the USPTO's Public Search Facility and Global Dossier is essential for thorough analysis.

FAQs

Q: What is the importance of claim scope in a patent application? A: The claim scope defines the breadth of protection granted to the inventor and must be balanced to avoid being too broad or too narrow, which can affect the patent's validity and enforceability.

Q: How does the Alice/Mayo framework impact patent claims? A: The Alice/Mayo framework involves a two-step test to determine if a claim is directed to an ineligible concept and if it contains an inventive concept that transforms the nature of the claim.

Q: What types of inventions are patent-eligible under Section 101 of the Patent Act? A: Patent-eligible inventions include processes, machines, manufactures, and compositions of matter, excluding certain concepts like abstract ideas and purely natural processes unless they contain an inventive concept.

Q: How can one access and analyze patent data effectively? A: Tools like the USPTO's Public Search Facility, PTRCs, and the Global Dossier service provide comprehensive resources for searching and analyzing patent applications and granted patents.

Q: What are the potential risks of overly broad patent claims? A: Overly broad claims risk being invalidated due to prior art, abstract idea exceptions, or failure to meet the written description requirement.

Sources

  1. Canadian Patents Database - Patent 2819769 Summary
  2. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) - USAGov
  3. Rimon Law - The Importance of Getting the Claim Scope Right in a US Patent Application
  4. USPTO - Search for patents
  5. CRS Reports - Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Reform: An Overview

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,688,530

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 5,688,530

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom9016840Aug 01, 1990

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.