You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 24, 2025

Details for Patent: 5,942,519


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,942,519
Title: Prevention of precipitated acute urinary retention
Abstract:This invention is concerned with the prevention of precipitated acute urinary retention in a subject male susceptible thereto by the administration of an inhibitor of 5.alpha.-reductase to the subject. The present invention also provides for a method of reducing the risk of precipitated acute urinary retention by the administration of a 5.alpha.-reductase inhibitor to the subject at risk therefor.
Inventor(s): Waldstreicher; Joanne (Scotch Plains, NJ)
Assignee: Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, NJ)
Application Number:09/178,138
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 5,942,519: A Comprehensive Guide

Introduction

Understanding the scope and claims of a patent is crucial for inventors, patent attorneys, and businesses to navigate the complex landscape of intellectual property. This article will delve into the specifics of United States Patent 5,942,519, providing a detailed analysis of its claims, scope, and the broader patent landscape.

Understanding Patent Claims

Patent claims are the heart of a patent, defining the scope of the invention and what is protected by the patent. The USPTO emphasizes that claims must be clear, concise, and fully supported by the patent's description[3].

The Patent in Question: 5,942,519

To analyze the scope and claims of United States Patent 5,942,519, one must first identify the patent's title, inventors, and the date it was granted. However, since the specific details of this patent are not provided in the sources, we will use general principles to guide our analysis.

Title and Inventors

The title of the patent gives a broad idea of the invention, while the inventors listed are those who conceived and reduced the idea to practice. Correct inventorship is critical, as errors can lead to the patent being unenforceable[2].

Date of Grant

The date of grant helps in understanding the patent's validity period and any potential prior art that may have existed at the time of filing.

Analyzing Patent Claims

Claim Structure

Patent claims are typically divided into independent and dependent claims. Independent claims stand alone and define the invention, while dependent claims refer back to and further limit the independent claims[3].

Claim Scope

The scope of the claims determines what is protected by the patent. This includes the specific features, processes, or products described in the claims. A broader claim scope provides wider protection but may be more susceptible to challenges based on prior art.

Claim Interpretation

Interpreting patent claims involves understanding the language used and the context in which the claims are made. This often requires a deep dive into the patent's specification and any relevant prosecution history[3].

Patent Landscape Analysis

Prior Art Search

Conducting a thorough prior art search is essential to understand the existing patent landscape. Tools like the USPTO's Patent Public Search, Global Dossier, and the Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) database are invaluable for this purpose[1][4].

Patent Classification

The Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) system helps in categorizing patents and identifying relevant prior art. This system is used globally and facilitates the search for similar inventions across different jurisdictions[4].

Global Patent Family

Using tools like Global Dossier, one can identify the patent family for a specific application, including all related applications filed at participating IP Offices. This provides a comprehensive view of the invention's global protection[1].

Tools and Resources for Patent Analysis

USPTO Resources

  • Patent Public Search: A powerful tool for searching U.S. patents and published applications.
  • Global Dossier: Provides access to file histories of related applications from participating IP Offices.
  • Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs): Offers local search resources and training in patent search techniques[1].

International Databases

  • PATENTSCOPE: Provides access to international Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) applications and patent documents from participating national and regional patent offices[4].

Economic and Legal Implications

Patent Scope Measurements

The USPTO's Patent Claims Research Dataset provides detailed information on claims from U.S. patents and applications, including measures of patent scope. This data can help in understanding the economic implications of a patent's claims[3].

Legal Considerations

Correct inventorship and the absence of deceptive intent are crucial for the enforceability of a patent. Errors in inventorship can lead to the patent being invalid and unenforceable[2].

Case Studies and Expert Insights

Expert Opinions

Experts in patent law, such as those involved in the study for a small claims patent court, emphasize the importance of clear and enforceable patent claims. For instance, Andrei Iancu, former Undersecretary of Commerce for IP and Director of the USPTO, has highlighted the need for robust patent protection mechanisms[5].

Legal Precedents

Cases like Frank’s Casing Crew v. PMR Technologies illustrate the consequences of incorrect or deceptive inventorship. Such cases underscore the importance of meticulous inventorship determination and transparent patent application processes[2].

Key Takeaways

  • Clear Claims: Patent claims must be clear, concise, and fully supported by the patent's description.
  • Correct Inventorship: Accurate identification of inventors is crucial for the enforceability of a patent.
  • Prior Art Search: Thorough prior art searches are essential to understand the existing patent landscape.
  • Global Patent Family: Identifying the global patent family helps in understanding the invention's global protection.
  • Economic Implications: Analyzing patent scope measurements can provide insights into the economic implications of a patent.

FAQs

Q: What is the importance of correct inventorship in a patent application?

Correct inventorship is crucial because errors can lead to the patent being invalid and unenforceable. It ensures that the true and only inventors are listed, avoiding any deceptive intent that could invalidate the patent[2].

Q: How can I conduct a thorough prior art search for a patent?

You can use tools like the USPTO's Patent Public Search, Global Dossier, and the Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) database. Additionally, resources from Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs) and international databases like PATENTSCOPE can be very helpful[1][4].

Q: What are the economic implications of patent scope measurements?

Patent scope measurements, as provided by the USPTO's Patent Claims Research Dataset, can help in understanding the breadth of protection and the potential economic impact of a patent. This data can be used to assess the competitiveness and market potential of an invention[3].

Q: Why is it important to analyze the global patent family of a patent?

Analyzing the global patent family helps in understanding the invention's protection across different jurisdictions. This is crucial for businesses looking to expand globally and ensure their inventions are protected in various markets[1].

Q: What are the consequences of deceptive intent in naming inventors?

Deceptive intent in naming inventors can lead to the patent being invalid and unenforceable. Even if the correct inventorship can be established later, a patent obtained through fraud remains unenforceable[2].

Sources

  1. USPTO: Search for patents - USPTO.
  2. Oregon State University: Determining Inventorship for US Patent Applications.
  3. USPTO: Patent Claims Research Dataset.
  4. Clemson University: Research and Course Guides: Patent Searching, Advanced: Overview.
  5. Administrative Conference of the United States: U.S. Patent Small Claims Court.

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,942,519

ApplicantTradenameGeneric NameDosageNDAApproval DateTETypeRLDRSPatent No.Patent ExpirationProductSubstanceDelist Req.Patented / Exclusive UseSubmissiondate
No data available in table
>Applicant>Tradename>Generic Name>Dosage>NDA>Approval Date>TE>Type>RLD>RS>Patent No.>Patent Expiration>Product>Substance>Delist Req.>Patented / Exclusive Use>Submissiondate
Showing 0 to 0 of 0 entries

International Family Members for US Patent 5,942,519

CountryPatent NumberEstimated ExpirationSupplementary Protection CertificateSPC CountrySPC Expiration
Australia 1279099 ⤷  Try for Free
Australia 731576 ⤷  Try for Free
Canada 2308070 ⤷  Try for Free
European Patent Office 1032400 ⤷  Try for Free
>Country>Patent Number>Estimated Expiration>Supplementary Protection Certificate>SPC Country>SPC Expiration
Showing 1 to 4 of 4 entries

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.