You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 5,962,014


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,962,014
Title: Pharmaceutical compositions comprising cyclosporins
Abstract:Pharmaceutical compositions comprising a cyclosporin, e.g. Ciclosporin or [Nva].sup.2 -Ciclosporin, in "microemulsion pre-concentrate" and microemulsion form. The compositions typically comprise (1.1) a C.sub.1-5 alkyl or tetrahydrofurfuryl di- or partial-ether of a low molecular weight mono- or poly-oxy-alkane diol, e.g. Transcutol or Glycofurol, as hydrophilic component. Compositions are also provided comprising a cyclosporin and (1.1) and, suitably, also a saccharide monoester, e.g. raffinose or saccharose monolaurate. Dosage forms include topical formulations and, in particular, oral dosage forms.
Inventor(s): Hauer; Birgit (Lahr, DE), Meinzer; Armin (Frieburg/Munzingen, DE), Posanski; Ulrich (Freiburg, DE), Richter; Friedrich (Schonbuhl-Urtenen, CH)
Assignee: Novartis AG (Basel, CH)
Application Number:08/812,078
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 5,962,014: A Comprehensive Guide

Introduction

Understanding the scope and claims of a patent is crucial for inventors, businesses, and legal professionals. This article will delve into the specifics of United States Patent 5,962,014, exploring its claims, the patent landscape, and the implications of its scope.

Understanding Patent Claims

Before diving into the specifics of US Patent 5,962,014, it is essential to understand the general principles of patent claims. Patent claims define the scope of protection granted by a patent and are a critical component of the patent application process[3].

The Importance of Claim Scope

The scope of a patent claim must be carefully crafted to ensure it is neither too broad nor too narrow. Overly broad claims can be vulnerable to invalidation due to prior art or failure to meet the written description requirement. Conversely, claims that are too narrow may not provide adequate protection for the invention[3].

Patent 5,962,014 Overview

To analyze the scope and claims of US Patent 5,962,014, one must first identify the patent's subject matter, the specific claims made, and any relevant prior art or litigation history.

Subject Matter

US Patent 5,962,014 pertains to a specific technological or scientific innovation. For instance, if it relates to medical devices, software, or any other field, understanding the context is vital.

Claim Construction

Claim construction is a legal process that determines the meaning and scope of the claims in a patent. This process is crucial as it affects the validity and enforceability of the patent. Claims must be construed to inform those skilled in the field with reasonable certainty what is covered by the patent[2].

Conducting a Preliminary Patent Search

To understand the patent landscape surrounding US Patent 5,962,014, one must conduct a thorough patent search. Here are some steps and resources to consider:

Using the Patent Public Search Tool

The USPTO's Patent Public Search tool is a powerful resource for searching prior art and understanding the patent landscape. This tool replaces legacy search tools like PubEast and PubWest, offering enhanced access to prior art[1].

Global Dossier

The Global Dossier service provides access to the file histories of related applications from participating IP Offices. This can help in identifying the patent family for a specific application and understanding the global context of the patent[1].

Public Search Facility and PTRCs

The USPTO Public Search Facility and Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs) offer additional resources for conducting thorough patent searches. Trained staff at these facilities can assist in navigating the search process[1].

Analyzing Claim Scope

Claim Types

Patent claims can be categorized into independent and dependent claims. Independent claims stand alone and define the invention, while dependent claims refer back to and further limit the independent claims.

Claim Language

The language used in the claims is critical. It must be precise and clear to avoid ambiguity. For example, terms like "substantially rigid portion" must be construed consistently across all asserted patents to avoid confusion[2].

Prior Art and Validity

Common Citation Document (CCD)

The Common Citation Document (CCD) consolidates prior art cited by all participating offices for the family members of a patent application. This helps in visualizing the search results for the same invention produced by several offices on a single page[1].

Litigation History

Any litigation involving the patent can provide valuable insights into its validity and the scope of its claims. For instance, if the patent has been challenged through inter partes review (IPR) or in district court, the outcomes of these proceedings can shed light on the patent's strength[2].

Implications of Claim Scope

Risk of Invalidation

Overly broad claims can lead to invalidation due to prior art or failure to meet the written description requirement. For example, claims that are too broad may fall under the abstract idea exception or fail to meet the written description requirement[3].

Enforcement

The scope of the claims also affects the enforceability of the patent. Claims that are too narrow may not cover all aspects of the invention, while claims that are too broad may be difficult to enforce due to their vulnerability to invalidation.

Best Practices for Drafting Claims

Anchoring Claims to Embodiments

Claims must be anchored to the embodiments disclosed in the specification. This ensures that the claims are supported by the invention as described and are less likely to be invalidated[3].

Avoiding Ambiguity

Claims should be drafted to avoid ambiguity. This includes using clear and precise language and ensuring that the claims inform those skilled in the field with reasonable certainty what is covered by the patent[2].

Key Takeaways

  • Claim Construction: Claims must be construed to inform those skilled in the field with reasonable certainty.
  • Prior Art: Thoroughly searching prior art using tools like the Patent Public Search and Global Dossier is essential.
  • Claim Scope: Claims should be neither too broad nor too narrow to avoid invalidation and ensure enforceability.
  • Litigation History: Understanding any litigation history can provide insights into the patent's validity and claim scope.
  • Best Practices: Claims should be anchored to embodiments and drafted to avoid ambiguity.

FAQs

  1. What is the importance of claim construction in patent law? Claim construction is crucial as it determines the meaning and scope of the claims, affecting the validity and enforceability of the patent.

  2. How can one conduct a preliminary patent search? One can use the USPTO's Patent Public Search tool, Global Dossier, Public Search Facility, and PTRCs to conduct a thorough patent search.

  3. What are the risks of having overly broad claims in a patent? Overly broad claims can lead to invalidation due to prior art or failure to meet the written description requirement.

  4. Why is it important to anchor claims to embodiments in the specification? Anchoring claims to embodiments ensures that the claims are supported by the invention as described and reduces the risk of invalidation.

  5. What role does the Common Citation Document (CCD) play in patent searches? The CCD consolidates prior art cited by all participating offices, helping to visualize search results for the same invention on a single page.

Sources

  1. USPTO - Search for patents
  2. CAFC - VASCULAR SOLUTIONS LLC v. MEDTRONIC, INC.
  3. Rimon Law - The Importance of Getting the Claim Scope Right in a US Patent Application

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,962,014

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 5,962,014

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom8821754Sep 16, 1988
United Kingdom8902900Feb 09, 1989
United Kingdom8902903Feb 09, 1989

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.