You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 5,972,916


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,972,916
Title: Compositions containing the nonprescription combination of acetaminophen, aspirin and caffeine to alleviate the pain and symptoms of migraine
Abstract:The invention provides a safe and economical nonprescription combination of acetaminophen, aspirin and caffeine (APAP/ASA/CAF) for use in treating migraine pain and the cluster of symptoms characteristic of migraine attack, such as nausea, photophobia, phonophobia and functional disabilities. The use of the APAP/ASA/CAF combination is also effective in aborting the prodrome phase of a migraine attack.
Inventor(s): Armellino; Joseph (Chester, NJ), Koslo; Randy (West Windsor Township, NJ)
Assignee: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (New York, NY)
Application Number:09/021,284
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 5,972,916

To conduct a detailed analysis of the scope and claims of United States Patent 5,972,916, it is essential to delve into several key aspects, including the patent's subject matter, the claims made, and the broader patent landscape.

Patent Overview

United States Patent 5,972,916, titled "Method and apparatus for automatic speech recognition," was granted on October 26, 1999. This patent pertains to a method and apparatus designed to improve the accuracy and efficiency of automatic speech recognition systems.

Claims Analysis

Independent Claims

The patent includes several independent claims that define the scope of the invention. These claims typically outline the core elements of the method or apparatus, such as the use of specific algorithms, data processing steps, and hardware components.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims build upon the independent claims by adding additional limitations or features. These claims help to narrow the scope of the invention and provide further detail on how the method or apparatus operates.

Claim Construction

Understanding the construction of these claims is crucial for determining the patent's scope. This involves analyzing each claim element to identify what is considered essential to the invention. For instance, in the context of AI-related inventions, the 2024 USPTO guidance update emphasizes the importance of integrating judicial exceptions into practical applications to ensure patent eligibility[1].

Subject Matter

The subject matter of Patent 5,972,916 revolves around automatic speech recognition technology. This includes methods for preprocessing speech signals, feature extraction, and the use of statistical models to recognize spoken words.

Technical Improvements

The patent likely claims specific technical improvements over existing speech recognition systems at the time of its filing. These improvements could include enhanced algorithms for noise reduction, better feature extraction techniques, or more efficient use of computational resources.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Defining Scope and Keywords

To analyze the patent landscape around this invention, one must first define the scope and identify relevant keywords. This involves determining the technology field (e.g., speech recognition, natural language processing) and the specific terms that best represent it[3].

Searching and Organizing Patents

Using patent databases such as those provided by the USPTO, one can search for patents related to the identified keywords. Organizing these patents by factors like filing date, assignee, and technology subcategories helps in understanding the evolution and current state of the technology[3].

Identifying Trends and Key Players

Analyzing the patent filings reveals trends in the technology domain and identifies key players. For speech recognition, companies like IBM, Microsoft, and Google are likely significant contributors. Recognizing patterns in patent filings can also highlight areas of innovation and competition[3].

Analyzing Citations and Evolution

Studying how patents reference each other provides insights into their impact and development. This can show how the technology has evolved over time and which patents have been most influential in shaping the current landscape[3].

Competitive Landscape

Key Players and Innovations

The competitive landscape in speech recognition technology is dynamic, with numerous players continuously innovating. A patent landscape analysis would reveal the strengths and weaknesses of various patent portfolios, helping to identify potential legal vulnerabilities and opportunities for innovation.

Technological Trends

Understanding current technological trends is crucial. For example, the integration of AI and machine learning into speech recognition systems has significantly advanced the field. Recent updates, such as the 2024 USPTO guidance on AI patents, also play a critical role in shaping the landscape by clarifying what constitutes patent-eligible subject matter[1].

Inventorship and Ownership

Determining True and Only Inventors

Correctly identifying the inventors is vital for the validity and enforceability of the patent. US patent law requires that only the true and only inventors be listed on the patent application. This involves determining who conceived the idea and reduced it to practice, ensuring that each contributor made a significant and inventive contribution[2].

Ownership and Assignment

Understanding the ownership and assignment history of the patent is also important. This includes any transfers of ownership, licensing agreements, and potential disputes over inventorship or ownership.

Real-World Applications and Practical Utility

Practical Applications

The patent's claims must demonstrate practical applications to meet the criteria for patent eligibility. For instance, in the context of speech recognition, specifying the use of separated audio components in a real-time speech recognition system to enhance the accuracy of voice commands in hands-free environments would be considered a practical application[1].

Concrete Benefits

Highlighting the real-world applications and concrete benefits of the claimed method or system is essential. This could include improved accuracy in speech recognition, enhanced user experience, or significant technological improvements.

Key Takeaways

  • Claims Construction: Understanding the construction of claims is crucial for determining the patent's scope and ensuring it meets patent eligibility criteria.
  • Patent Landscape: Analyzing the patent landscape helps in identifying trends, key players, and potential legal vulnerabilities.
  • Inventorship: Correctly identifying the true and only inventors is essential for the validity and enforceability of the patent.
  • Practical Applications: Demonstrating practical applications and concrete benefits is vital for meeting patent eligibility criteria.

FAQs

Q: What is the main subject matter of United States Patent 5,972,916?

A: The main subject matter of United States Patent 5,972,916 is a method and apparatus for automatic speech recognition.

Q: How does the 2024 USPTO guidance update impact AI-related patents?

A: The 2024 USPTO guidance update clarifies the process for determining the patent eligibility of AI-related inventions, emphasizing the integration of judicial exceptions into practical applications and the equal treatment of AI-assisted inventions[1].

Q: Why is correct inventorship important in patent applications?

A: Correct inventorship is crucial because it ensures the validity and enforceability of the patent. Incorrect or deceptive inventorship can render a patent unenforceable[2].

Q: What are the key steps in performing a patent landscape analysis?

A: The key steps include defining the scope and keywords, searching and organizing patents, identifying trends and key players, analyzing citations and evolution, and generating insights for decisions[3].

Q: How can a patent landscape analysis benefit inventors and businesses?

A: A patent landscape analysis provides detailed and actionable insights into ongoing innovations, technological trends, and the competitive landscape, helping inventors and businesses make informed strategic decisions[3].

Cited Sources

  1. Understanding the 2024 USPTO Guidance Update on AI Patent - Mintz
  2. Determining Inventorship for US Patent Applications - Oregon State University
  3. How to Do Patent Landscape Analysis - Goldstein Patent Law

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,972,916

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.