You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 6,080,428


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,080,428
Title: Nicotinic acid compositions for treating hyperlipidemia and related methods therefor
Abstract:An orally administered antihyperlipidemia composition according to the present invention includes from about 250 to about 3000 parts by weight of nicotinic acid, and from about 5 to about 50 parts by weight of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose. Also, a method of treating hyperlipidemia in a hyperlipidemic having a substantially periodic physiological loss of consciousness, includes the steps of forming a composition having an effective antihyperlipidemic amount of nicotinic acid and a time release sustaining amount of a swelling agent. The method also includes the step of orally administering the composition to the hyperlipidemic once per day "nocturnally", that is in the evening or at night.
Inventor(s): Bova; David J. (Hollywood, FL)
Assignee:
Application Number:08/368,378
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 6,080,428
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

United States Patent 6,080,428: A Detailed Analysis of Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

The United States Patent 6,080,428, hereafter referred to as the '428 patent, is a significant patent in the pharmaceutical industry, particularly in the treatment of hyperlipidemia. This patent, owned by Abbott Laboratories, covers compositions and methods related to nicotinic acid (niacin) extended-release formulations, often used in conjunction with other drugs like simvastatin.

Background and History

The '428 patent was filed in 1995 as a continuation-in-part application of an initial application submitted in 1993 (08/124,392), which was later abandoned. The patent was granted in June 2000[2].

Claims and Scope

The '428 patent includes multiple claims that define the scope of the invention. Here are some key aspects:

Composition Claims

The patent claims cover specific compositions of nicotinic acid in extended-release formulations. These compositions are designed to treat hyperlipidemia by managing cholesterol levels and reducing the risk of cardiovascular diseases[4].

Method Claims

In addition to composition claims, the patent also includes method claims related to the administration and dosing of these formulations. These methods are crucial for ensuring the efficacy and safety of the treatment[2].

Key Claim Elements

  • The patent specifies the use of an internal hydrophobic component, which is distinct from other similar patents.
  • The dosing and time of administration are critical elements, highlighting the importance of controlled release to achieve therapeutic effects[2].

Patent Family and Continuations

The '428 patent is part of a larger family of patents related to the same invention. Other patents in this family include:

  • U.S. Patent No. 6,129,930 ('930 patent), a continuation-in-part of the '428 patent.
  • U.S. Patent No. 6,406,715 ('715 patent), U.S. Patent No. 6,818,229 ('229 patent), U.S. Patent No. 6,676,967 ('967 patent), and U.S. Patent No. 6,746,691 ('691 patent), all of which are continuations-in-part from the '930 patent.
  • U.S. Patent No. 7,011,848 ('848 patent), a continuation from the '930 patent[2].

Patent Infringement and Litigation

The '428 patent has been at the center of several patent infringement lawsuits. For instance, Abbott Laboratories has sued companies like Teva Pharmaceuticals and Lupin Limited for allegedly infringing on this and other related patents by manufacturing and selling generic versions of niacin extended-release/simvastatin tablets[1][2].

Teva Pharmaceuticals Case

In one notable case, Abbott alleged that Teva's submission of an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) for generic niacin extended-release/simvastatin tablets constituted an act of infringement. Abbott sought an injunction to prevent Teva from making, using, offering to sell, or selling these generic tablets until the expiration of the '428 patent and other related patents[1].

Lupin Limited Case

Similarly, in a case against Lupin Limited, Abbott argued that Lupin's proposed construction of certain claim terms was incorrect and that the prosecution history of the '428 patent supported Abbott's interpretation. This case highlights the complexities and disputes that can arise in claim construction and patent infringement litigation[2].

Claim Construction and Prosecution History

The interpretation of claim terms is crucial in patent litigation. The prosecution history of the '428 patent, including office actions and communications, plays a significant role in determining the proper construction of disputed claim terms. For example, the argument over the term "oral solid dosage form" involved detailed analysis of the patent's file history and the inventor's arguments during the patent application process[2].

Economic and Strategic Impact

The '428 patent and its related family of patents have significant economic and strategic implications for pharmaceutical companies. These patents protect valuable intellectual property related to the treatment of hyperlipidemia, a common condition affecting millions of people worldwide. The ability to enforce these patents can provide a competitive advantage and protect market share against generic competitors.

Statistical and Data Analysis

The USPTO's Patent Claims Research Dataset provides insights into the scope and complexity of patent claims, including those of the '428 patent. This dataset can help in analyzing the dependency relationships between claims and the overall scope of the patent, which is crucial for understanding the patent's strength and potential vulnerabilities[3].

Inventorship and Patent Ownership

Correctly identifying the inventors of a patent is essential for its validity and enforceability. The '428 patent lists David J. Bova as the inventor, and ensuring that the true and only inventors are listed is critical to avoid legal challenges in the future[4][5].

Conclusion

The United States Patent 6,080,428 is a pivotal patent in the pharmaceutical industry, particularly in the treatment of hyperlipidemia. Its claims and scope are carefully defined to protect specific compositions and methods of administration. The patent's history, litigation, and economic impact highlight its significance and the complexities involved in patent law.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Scope: The '428 patent covers specific compositions and methods related to nicotinic acid extended-release formulations.
  • Patent Family: It is part of a larger family of patents related to hyperlipidemia treatments.
  • Litigation: The patent has been involved in several infringement lawsuits against generic drug manufacturers.
  • Claim Construction: The interpretation of claim terms is critical and often disputed in litigation.
  • Economic Impact: The patent has significant economic implications for pharmaceutical companies.
  • Inventorship: Correct identification of inventors is crucial for the patent's validity.

FAQs

Q: What is the main subject matter of the '428 patent?

A: The '428 patent covers compositions and methods for treating hyperlipidemia using nicotinic acid extended-release formulations.

Q: Who is the inventor listed on the '428 patent?

A: David J. Bova is listed as the inventor.

Q: What other patents are part of the same family as the '428 patent?

A: Other patents include U.S. Patent No. 6,129,930, U.S. Patent No. 6,406,715, U.S. Patent No. 6,818,229, U.S. Patent No. 6,676,967, U.S. Patent No. 6,746,691, and U.S. Patent No. 7,011,848.

Q: What are some of the key claim elements of the '428 patent?

A: Key elements include the use of an internal hydrophobic component and specific dosing and administration methods.

Q: Why is claim construction important in patent litigation?

A: Claim construction is crucial because it determines the scope of the patent and can significantly impact the outcome of infringement lawsuits.

Cited Sources

  1. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ABBOTT LABORATORIES and ABBOTT RESPIRATORY LLC, Plaintiffs, v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD. and TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., Defendants. [PDF]
  2. Case 1:09-cv-00152-JJF-LPS Document 95 Filed 06/18/10 Page 1 [PDF]
  3. Patent Claims Research Dataset - USPTO
  4. Nicotinic acid compositions for treating hyperlipidemia and related methods therefor
  5. Determining Inventorship for US Patent Applications [PDF]

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,080,428

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 6,080,428

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 289197 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 4751802 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 6348198 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 6454598 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 775967 ⤷  Subscribe
Brazil 9815454 ⤷  Subscribe
Brazil 9815457 ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.