You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 6,080,759


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,080,759
Title: Paroxetine hydrochloride form A
Abstract:"Paroxetine hydrochloride (I) anhydrate free of bound propan-2-ol, and various forms thereof, are useful in the treatment of depression and other disorders for which administration of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are indicated."
Inventor(s): Ward; Neal (Crowborough, GB), Jacewicz; Victor Witold (Tunbridge Wells, GB)
Assignee: SmithKline Beecham Corporation (Philadelphia, PA)
Application Number:08/922,062
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Process;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

United States Patent 6,080,759: A Detailed Analysis of Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

United States Patent 6,080,759, titled "Paroxetine hydrochloride form A," is a significant patent in the pharmaceutical industry, particularly in the realm of antidepressant medications. This patent, granted to various assignees over the years, covers a specific crystalline form of paroxetine hydrochloride, a widely used selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI).

Background

Paroxetine hydrochloride is a well-known antidepressant used in the treatment of various mental health conditions, including major depressive disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and anxiety disorders. The patent in question focuses on a particular crystalline form of this compound, designated as Form A.

Scope of the Patent

Claims

The patent includes several claims that define the scope of protection for the invention. Here are some key aspects:

  • Claim 1: This claim describes the crystalline form of paroxetine hydrochloride, specifically Form A, characterized by its X-ray powder diffraction pattern and other physical properties[2][5].
  • Subsequent Claims: These claims cover various aspects such as the process for preparing Form A, pharmaceutical compositions containing this form, and methods of using these compositions for treating mental health disorders.

Scope Concepts

To understand the broader implications of these claims, it is essential to categorize them by scope concepts. This involves grouping claims based on overarching themes such as the chemical structure, preparation methods, and therapeutic applications. For example:

  • Chemical Structure: Claims related to the specific crystalline form of paroxetine hydrochloride.
  • Preparation Methods: Claims detailing the processes for synthesizing and purifying Form A.
  • Therapeutic Applications: Claims covering the use of Form A in various pharmaceutical compositions and treatment methods[3].

Patent Landscape

Related Patents

The patent landscape surrounding U.S. Patent 6,080,759 includes several related patents that cover different aspects of paroxetine hydrochloride and its uses. These include:

  • Process Patents: Patents that describe alternative methods for synthesizing paroxetine hydrochloride.
  • Formulation Patents: Patents covering different pharmaceutical formulations that include paroxetine hydrochloride.
  • Use Patents: Patents that describe new therapeutic uses or combinations of paroxetine hydrochloride with other compounds[5].

Expiration and Generic Entry

The expiration date of a patent is crucial for understanding when generic versions of the drug can enter the market. For U.S. Patent 6,080,759, the expiration date has significant implications for the pharmaceutical industry:

  • Generic Competition: Once the patent expires, generic manufacturers can produce and market their own versions of paroxetine hydrochloride Form A, potentially reducing the market share of the original patent holder[5].

International Patents

The protection afforded by U.S. Patent 6,080,759 is not limited to the United States. The patent has international counterparts that provide similar protection in other jurisdictions:

  • International Patent Filings: These filings ensure that the invention is protected globally, preventing unauthorized use and manufacture in other countries[5].

Claim Coverage Matrix

To effectively manage and analyze the claims of U.S. Patent 6,080,759, a Claim Coverage Matrix can be utilized. This tool helps in categorizing patents by claims and scope concepts, making it easier to identify gaps in coverage and potential future directions:

  • Categorization: Claims are categorized by their scope concepts, such as chemical structure, preparation methods, and therapeutic applications.
  • Interactive Claim Charts: These charts, generated using tools like ClaimScape®, facilitate a quick and accurate review of patent coverage by technical experts, engineers, and management. They help in identifying areas where claim coverage is lacking and highlight future design opportunities[3].

Impact on Intellectual Property Strategy

Understanding the scope and claims of U.S. Patent 6,080,759 is vital for any company involved in the development or manufacture of paroxetine hydrochloride. Here are some strategic implications:

  • Patent Maintenance: Deciding whether to maintain or abandon the patent based on its current and future value to the company.
  • Innovation: Identifying areas for further innovation and development, such as new formulations or therapeutic uses.
  • Competitive Analysis: Analyzing the patent landscape to understand competitors' positions and potential threats or opportunities[3].

Quality of Patent Examination

The quality of the patent examination process is crucial for ensuring that patents like U.S. Patent 6,080,759 are thoroughly vetted before being granted. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has taken steps to improve the examination process:

  • Time for Examination: The USPTO has increased the time available for certain art units to perform thorough patent examinations, ensuring that patents are granted only after a rigorous review process[4].

Obviousness-Type Double Patenting (ODP)

In the context of patent families and continuations, ODP is an important consideration. This principle prevents an inventor from securing a second, later-expiring patent for an invention covered by a patent that was filed at the same time but has a different patent term due to a grant of Patent Term Adjustment (PTA)[1].

Key Takeaways

  • Specific Crystalline Form: U.S. Patent 6,080,759 covers a specific crystalline form of paroxetine hydrochloride, Form A.
  • Claims and Scope Concepts: The patent includes claims related to the chemical structure, preparation methods, and therapeutic applications, which can be categorized by scope concepts.
  • Patent Landscape: The patent is part of a broader landscape that includes related patents and international filings.
  • Expiration and Generic Entry: The expiration date of the patent is critical for understanding when generic competition can enter the market.
  • Intellectual Property Strategy: Understanding the patent's scope and claims is essential for maintaining and innovating around the patent.

FAQs

What is the main subject of U.S. Patent 6,080,759?

U.S. Patent 6,080,759 covers a specific crystalline form of paroxetine hydrochloride, known as Form A.

How are the claims of U.S. Patent 6,080,759 categorized?

The claims are categorized by scope concepts such as chemical structure, preparation methods, and therapeutic applications.

What is the significance of the expiration date of U.S. Patent 6,080,759?

The expiration date marks when generic manufacturers can produce and market their own versions of paroxetine hydrochloride Form A, potentially reducing the market share of the original patent holder.

How does the USPTO ensure the quality of patent examinations?

The USPTO has increased the time available for certain art units to perform thorough patent examinations and engages external and internal stakeholders to improve the examination process.

What is Obviousness-Type Double Patenting (ODP), and how does it relate to U.S. Patent 6,080,759?

ODP prevents an inventor from securing a second, later-expiring patent for an invention covered by a patent that was filed at the same time but has a different patent term due to a grant of PTA. This principle is relevant when dealing with patent families and continuations.

Sources

  1. In re Cellect - United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
  2. Paroxetine hydrochloride form A - PubChem
  3. Patent Analytics - Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
  4. Intellectual Property: Patent Office Should Define Quality, Reassess ... - U.S. Government Accountability Office
  5. Drugs covered by patent 6,080,759 - DrugPatentWatch

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,080,759

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 6,080,759

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom9502297Feb 06, 1995
United Kingdom9503112Feb 17, 1995

International Family Members for US Patent 6,080,759

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
African Regional IP Organization (ARIPO) 9600780 ⤷  Subscribe
Argentina 001982 ⤷  Subscribe
Argentina 036856 ⤷  Subscribe
Austria 407528 ⤷  Subscribe
Austria A21096 ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.