You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 23, 2024

Details for Patent: 6,087,367


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,087,367
Title: Potent inducers of terminal differentiation and methods of use thereof
Abstract:The present invention provides the compound having the structure: ##STR1## wherein each of R.sub.1 and R.sub.2 are independently the same as or different from each other; when R.sub.1 and R.sub.2 are the same, each is a substituted or unsubstituted arylamino, cycloalkylamino, pyridineamino, piperidino, 9-purine-6-amine, or thiozoleamino group; when R.sub.1 and R.sub.2 are different, R.sub.1 =R.sub.3 --N--R.sub.4, wherein each of R.sub.3 and R.sub.4 are independently the same as or different from each other and are a hydrogen atom, a hydroxyl group, a substituted or unsubstituted, branched or unbranched alkyl, alkenyl, cycloalkyl, aryl, alkyloxy, aryloxy, arylalkyloxy, or pyridine group, or R.sub.3 and R.sub.4 bond together to form a piperidine group and R.sub.2 is a hydroxylamino, hydroxyl, amino, alkylamino, dialkylamino or alkyloxy group; and n is an integer from about 4 to about 8. The present invention also provides a method of selectively inducing terminal differentiation of neoplastic cells and thereby inhibiting proliferation of such cells. Moreover, the present invention provides a method of treating a patient having a tumor characterized by proliferation of neoplastic cells. Lastly, the present invention provides a pharmaceutical composition comprising a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier and a therapeutically acceptable amount of the compound above.
Inventor(s): Breslow; Ronald (Englewood, NJ), Marks; Paul A. (Bridgewater, CT), Rifkind; Richard A. (New York, NY), Jursic; Branko (New Orleans, LA)
Assignee: Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research (New York, NY) The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York (New York, NY)
Application Number:09/314,195
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of a U.S. Patent: A Detailed Analysis of United States Patent 6,087,367

Introduction

When navigating the complex world of patents, understanding the scope and claims of a patent is crucial for inventors, businesses, and legal professionals. This article will delve into the specifics of United States Patent 6,087,367, using it as a case study to explain the broader concepts of patent scope, claims, and the patent landscape in the United States.

What is a Patent?

A patent is a government grant that gives the inventor exclusive rights to make, use, and sell an invention for a specified period, typically 20 years from the date of filing. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is responsible for granting U.S. patents and registering trademarks[1].

Determining Inventorship

Before diving into the specifics of a patent, it's essential to understand who qualifies as an inventor. U.S. patent law stipulates that only the "true and only" inventors should be listed on a patent application. This involves identifying individuals who conceived the idea or subject matter of the patent claims. Conception is defined as the formation in the mind of the inventor of a definite and permanent idea of the complete and operative invention[2].

Patent Claims

Patent claims are the heart of a patent application, defining the scope of the invention and what is protected by the patent. Claims must be clear, concise, and supported by the description in the patent specification. There are different types of claims, including independent claims and dependent claims. Independent claims stand alone and define the invention, while dependent claims refer back to and further limit an independent claim[3].

Independent Claims

Independent claims are crucial as they define the broadest scope of the invention. For example, in United States Patent 6,087,367, the independent claims would outline the core elements of the invention that distinguish it from prior art.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow down the scope of the invention by adding additional limitations to the independent claims. These claims are often used to protect variations or specific embodiments of the invention.

Patent Scope

The scope of a patent is determined by its claims. The broader the claims, the wider the scope of protection. However, broader claims also increase the risk of infringement by others and may face more challenges during the patent examination process.

Patent Scope Measurements

The USPTO has developed datasets and tools to measure patent scope, such as the Patent Claims Research Dataset. This dataset provides detailed information on claims from U.S. patents and patent applications, helping researchers and practitioners understand the scope and complexity of patents[3].

Analyzing United States Patent 6,087,367

To analyze the scope and claims of United States Patent 6,087,367, one would need to review the patent document in detail.

Identifying the Inventors

First, identify the listed inventors and ensure they are the true and only inventors of the subject matter. This is crucial for the patent's validity and enforceability[2].

Reading the Claims

Next, carefully read the independent and dependent claims. Independent claims will provide the broadest definition of the invention, while dependent claims will offer more specific details.

Understanding the Specification

The specification section of the patent provides a detailed description of the invention, including drawings and examples. This section supports the claims and helps in understanding the scope of the invention.

Prior Art and Novelty

Check the prior art cited in the patent to understand how the invention differs from existing technologies. This is essential for determining the novelty and non-obviousness of the invention.

The Patent Landscape

The patent landscape includes all existing patents and patent applications related to a particular technology or field. Understanding this landscape is vital for avoiding infringement and identifying potential competitors.

Global Dossier

Tools like the Global Dossier provided by the USPTO allow users to access file histories of related applications from participating IP offices. This helps in visualizing the patent family and understanding the global patent landscape[4].

Common Citation Document (CCD)

The CCD consolidates prior art cited by all participating offices for the family members of a patent application, making it easier to see the search results for the same invention produced by several offices on a single page[4].

Legal and Practical Considerations

Correcting Inventorship Errors

Errors in inventorship can be corrected, but deceptive intent in naming inventors can render a patent unenforceable. Ensuring correct inventorship is crucial for maintaining the validity of the patent[2].

Small Claims Patent Court

There have been discussions and studies on establishing a small claims patent court to handle disputes related to patents in a more efficient and cost-effective manner. This could significantly impact how patent disputes are resolved in the future[5].

Public Search Facilities and Resources

The USPTO provides various resources for searching and understanding patents, including the Public Search Facility in Alexandria, VA, and Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs) across the country. These resources are invaluable for conducting thorough patent searches and understanding the patent landscape[4].

Key Takeaways

  • Inventorship: Correctly identifying the true and only inventors is crucial for the validity and enforceability of a patent.
  • Patent Claims: Claims define the scope of the invention and must be clear, concise, and supported by the specification.
  • Patent Scope: The scope is determined by the claims, with broader claims offering wider protection but also higher risks.
  • Patent Landscape: Understanding the global patent landscape is essential for avoiding infringement and identifying competitors.
  • Legal Considerations: Ensuring correct inventorship and avoiding deceptive intent is vital for maintaining patent validity.

FAQs

Q: Who qualifies as an inventor on a U.S. patent application?

A: Only the "true and only" inventors who conceived the idea or subject matter of the patent claims qualify as inventors[2].

Q: What is the difference between independent and dependent claims?

A: Independent claims define the broadest scope of the invention, while dependent claims narrow down the scope by adding additional limitations[3].

Q: How can errors in inventorship be corrected?

A: Errors in inventorship can be corrected, but if there was deceptive intent, the patent may remain unenforceable[2].

Q: What is the Global Dossier, and how does it help in patent searches?

A: The Global Dossier is a service that provides access to file histories of related applications from participating IP offices, helping users visualize the patent family and understand the global patent landscape[4].

Q: Why is understanding the patent landscape important?

A: Understanding the patent landscape helps in avoiding infringement, identifying potential competitors, and making informed decisions about patent strategies.

Sources

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) | USAGov
  2. Determining Inventorship for US Patent Applications
  3. Patent Claims Research Dataset - USPTO
  4. Search for patents - USPTO
  5. U.S. Patent Small Claims Court

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,087,367

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 6,087,367

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 183185 ⤷  Subscribe
Austria 253906 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 2647495 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 2870392 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 6206396 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 668696 ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.