You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 6,124,304


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,124,304
Title: Penciclovir for the treatment of zoster associated pain
Abstract:A method for the treatment of ZAP, in particular PHN, in mammals, including humans, which method comprises administering to the mammal in need of such treatment, an effective amount of penciclovir or famciclovir, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.
Inventor(s): Boon; Ronald James (Dorking, GB), Griffin; David Ronald John (Bishop's Stortford, GB)
Assignee: SmithKline Beecham PLC (Brentford, GB)
Application Number:09/187,660
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of U.S. Patents: A Detailed Analysis

Introduction

When navigating the complex world of patents, understanding the scope and claims of a patent is crucial for inventors, businesses, and legal professionals. This article will delve into the specifics of patent scope and claims, using U.S. Patent 6,124,304 as a case study, and provide a comprehensive overview of the tools and resources available for patent searches and analysis.

What are Patent Claims?

Patent claims are the legal definitions of the invention, outlining what the inventor considers to be the novel and non-obvious aspects of their invention. These claims are a critical part of the patent application and are used to determine the scope of protection granted by the patent[3].

Measuring Patent Scope

The scope of a patent can be measured using various metrics, such as independent claim length and independent claim count. These metrics help in assessing the breadth and clarity of the patent claims. For instance, narrower claims at publication are often associated with a higher probability of grant and a shorter examination process[3].

U.S. Patent 6,124,304: A Case Study

To illustrate these concepts, let's consider U.S. Patent 6,124,304. This patent, like any other, includes a set of claims that define the invention. Here are some key points to consider:

Claim Structure

  • The patent includes a series of claims, each of which describes a specific aspect of the invention.
  • Independent claims stand alone and define the invention without reference to other claims, while dependent claims refer back to and further limit the independent claims.

Claim Language

  • The language used in the claims is precise and technical, ensuring that the scope of the invention is clearly defined.
  • The claims may include limitations and specifications that narrow down the invention to distinguish it from prior art.

Examination Process

  • During the patent examination process, the claims may be narrowed or modified based on feedback from the patent office to ensure they meet the criteria for novelty, non-obviousness, and utility.

Tools for Patent Searches and Analysis

Patent Public Search

The USPTO's Patent Public Search tool is a powerful resource for searching existing patents and published patent applications. It offers modern interfaces and enhanced access to prior art, making it easier to conduct comprehensive searches[1].

Global Dossier

The Global Dossier service provides access to the file histories of related applications from participating IP Offices. This tool is invaluable for seeing the patent family for a specific application and accessing dossier, classification, and citation data[1].

Public Search Facility and PTRCs

The USPTO Public Search Facility and Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs) offer additional resources for patent searches. Trained staff at these facilities can assist in using various search tools and techniques[1].

Common Citation Document (CCD)

The CCD application consolidates prior art cited by all participating offices for the family members of a patent application. This helps in visualizing search results from multiple offices on a single page[1].

International Patent Databases

For global patent searches, databases such as those provided by the European Patent Office (EPO), Japan Patent Office (JPO), and World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) are essential. These databases offer access to international patent applications and machine translations for some documents[1].

Conducting a Preliminary U.S. Patent Search

Conducting a preliminary patent search is a crucial step in determining the novelty and non-obviousness of an invention. Here’s a step-by-step strategy:

Identify Key Terms and Concepts

  • Start by identifying the key terms and concepts related to your invention.
  • Use these terms to search through patent databases.

Use Multiple Search Tools

  • Utilize the Patent Public Search tool, Global Dossier, and other resources mentioned above.
  • Search through the Electronic Official Gazette and other publications to find recently issued patents.

Analyze Search Results

  • Carefully analyze the search results to identify prior art that may be relevant to your invention.
  • Use tools like the Common Citation Document to consolidate and compare citations from different offices[1].

The Importance of Patent Scope in Innovation

The scope of a patent can significantly impact innovation. Here’s why:

Incentives for Innovation

  • Patents with clear and narrow claims can provide strong incentives for innovation by offering clear protection without overly broad claims that might stifle further development[3].

Licensing and Litigation

  • Overly broad patents can lead to increased licensing and litigation costs, which can diminish the incentives for innovation. Narrower claims, on the other hand, can reduce these costs and facilitate smoother licensing and collaboration[3].

Expert Insights and Statistics

Industry experts and studies highlight the importance of patent scope:

Expert Opinions

  • "The purported decrease in patent quality over the past decade or two has supposedly led to granting patents of increased breadth (or ‘overly broad’ patents), decreased clarity, and questionable validity," notes a study on patent scope[3].

Statistics

  • A large-scale analysis showed that narrower claims at publication are associated with a higher probability of grant and a shorter examination process. This underscores the importance of precise claim drafting[3].

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Claims: Define the legal boundaries of an invention and are crucial for determining patent scope.
  • Patent Scope Metrics: Independent claim length and count are useful metrics for measuring patent scope.
  • Tools and Resources: Utilize the USPTO's Patent Public Search, Global Dossier, and other international databases for comprehensive patent searches.
  • Innovation Impact: Clear and narrow patent claims can foster innovation by providing strong protection without stifling development.

FAQs

What is the purpose of patent claims in a patent application?

Patent claims define the legal boundaries of an invention, specifying what the inventor considers to be the novel and non-obvious aspects of their invention.

How can I measure the scope of a patent?

The scope of a patent can be measured using metrics such as independent claim length and independent claim count. These metrics help in assessing the breadth and clarity of the patent claims.

What resources are available for conducting a preliminary U.S. patent search?

Resources include the USPTO's Patent Public Search tool, Global Dossier, Public Search Facility, PTRCs, and international patent databases like those provided by the EPO, JPO, and WIPO.

Why is the scope of a patent important for innovation?

The scope of a patent can significantly impact innovation by providing clear protection without overly broad claims that might stifle further development. Narrower claims can reduce licensing and litigation costs, facilitating smoother collaboration.

How do overly broad patents affect innovation?

Overly broad patents can lead to increased licensing and litigation costs, diminishing the incentives for innovation. They can also result in patents with decreased clarity and questionable validity.

Sources

  1. USPTO: Search for patents - USPTO
  2. USA.gov: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) | USAGov
  3. SSRN: Patent Claims and Patent Scope
  4. Federal Register: Guidance on Use of Artificial Intelligence-Based Tools in Practice
  5. ACUS: U.S. Patent Small Claims Court

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,124,304

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 6,124,304

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom9320485Oct 05, 1993
United Kingdom9321255Dec 14, 1993
United Kingdom9326177Dec 22, 1993

International Family Members for US Patent 6,124,304

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
African Regional IP Organization (ARIPO) 616 ⤷  Subscribe
African Regional IP Organization (ARIPO) 9400684 ⤷  Subscribe
Austria 216885 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 1383495 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 697290 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 7788494 ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.