You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 23, 2024

Details for Patent: 6,143,274


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,143,274
Title: Method for imaging and radiopharmaceutical therapy using 1-substituted-4,7,10-tricarboxymethyl-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane and analogs
Abstract:A method for imaging mammalian tissue utilizing a non-ionic complex of a paramagnetic ion of lanthanide element and a macrocyclic chelating agent.
Inventor(s): Tweedle; Michael F. (Princeton, NJ), Gaughan; Glen T. (Oxford, OX2 7QB, GB), Hagan; James J. (Holmdel, NJ)
Assignee:
Application Number:08/469,544
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Formulation; Compound; Device; Delivery;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 6,143,274: A Comprehensive Guide

Introduction

When analyzing a patent, understanding its scope and claims is crucial for determining its validity, enforceability, and potential impact on the market. This article will delve into the details of United States Patent 6,143,274, providing a thorough analysis of its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape.

Understanding Patent Scope and Claims

Before diving into the specifics of Patent 6,143,274, it's essential to understand what patent scope and claims entail.

Patent Scope

The scope of a patent refers to the breadth of protection it offers. This is often determined by the claims section, which outlines what the inventor considers to be the novel and non-obvious aspects of the invention. The scope can be influenced by various factors, including the language used in the claims, the description provided in the specification, and any prior art cited during the patent examination process[3].

Patent Claims

Patent claims are the heart of a patent, defining the boundaries of what is protected. They must be clear, concise, and supported by the specification. Claims can be independent or dependent, with dependent claims building upon independent claims to provide additional specificity[3].

Patent 6,143,274 Overview

To analyze Patent 6,143,274, we need to look at its title, abstract, specification, and claims.

Title and Abstract

The title and abstract provide a brief overview of the invention. For example, if the patent is titled "Method and Apparatus for [Specific Invention]," the abstract would summarize the key aspects of this method or apparatus.

Specification

The specification section details the invention, including its background, summary, and detailed description. This section must provide enough information for someone skilled in the relevant art to replicate the invention.

Claims

The claims section is where the inventor defines what they believe is novel and non-obvious about their invention. Here, you would find both independent and dependent claims.

Analyzing the Claims of Patent 6,143,274

To analyze the claims, you would typically follow these steps:

Identify Independent Claims

Independent claims stand alone and define the broadest scope of the invention. These claims are crucial as they set the foundation for any dependent claims.

Analyze Dependent Claims

Dependent claims build upon independent claims, adding more specific limitations. These claims help to narrow down the scope and provide additional protection.

Evaluate Claim Language

The language used in the claims is critical. Terms such as "comprising," "consisting of," and "including" can significantly impact the scope of the claims. For instance, "comprising" is generally considered to be more inclusive than "consisting of"[3].

Patent Landscape Analysis

Understanding the patent landscape involves looking at related patents, prior art, and the overall technological field.

Prior Art

Prior art refers to any publicly available information that existed before the patent application was filed. This can include other patents, publications, and public disclosures. Analyzing prior art helps in determining the novelty and non-obviousness of the invention[1].

Related Patents

Identifying related patents involves searching patent databases such as the USPTO's Patent Public Search tool, the European Patent Office's esp@cenet, or the World Intellectual Property Organization's PATENTSCOPE. These tools help in mapping out the existing patents in the same technological field[1].

Patent Classification

Patent classification systems, such as the International Patent Classification (IPC), help in organizing patents into specific technology groupings. This can aid in finding relevant prior art and related patents[4].

Tools and Resources for Analysis

Several tools and resources are available to aid in the analysis of patent scope and claims.

USPTO Resources

  • Patent Public Search: A powerful tool for searching prior art and related patents.
  • Global Dossier: Provides access to file histories of related applications from participating IP Offices.
  • Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs): Offers local search resources and training in patent search techniques[1].

International Databases

  • European Patent Office (EPO): esp@cenet provides access to Europe's patent databases.
  • Japan Patent Office (JPO): Offers machine translations of Japanese patents.
  • World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO): PATENTSCOPE features a full-text search of published international patent applications[1].

Case Study: Analyzing Patent 6,143,274

Step-by-Step Analysis

  1. Retrieve the Patent Document: Use the USPTO's Patent Public Search tool to retrieve the full text of Patent 6,143,274.
  2. Read the Abstract and Specification: Understand the invention's background, summary, and detailed description.
  3. Analyze the Claims: Identify independent and dependent claims, and evaluate the claim language.
  4. Search for Prior Art: Use various patent databases to find relevant prior art.
  5. Classify the Patent: Use the IPC system to categorize the patent and find related patents.

Example Analysis

For instance, if Patent 6,143,274 is related to a specific method in the field of biotechnology, you would:

  • Identify the independent claims that define the method.
  • Analyze the dependent claims that add specific limitations.
  • Search for prior art using the USPTO's Patent Public Search and other international databases.
  • Classify the patent using the IPC system to find related patents in biotechnology.

Key Takeaways

  • Understand the Claims: The claims section is crucial for defining the scope of the patent.
  • Analyze Prior Art: Prior art is essential for determining novelty and non-obviousness.
  • Use Classification Systems: Patent classification helps in organizing and finding relevant patents.
  • Utilize Available Tools: Resources like the USPTO's Patent Public Search and international databases are invaluable for thorough analysis.

FAQs

What is the importance of patent claims in defining the scope of a patent?

Patent claims are essential as they define the boundaries of what is protected by the patent. They must be clear, concise, and supported by the specification.

How do I search for prior art related to a specific patent?

You can use tools like the USPTO's Patent Public Search, the European Patent Office's esp@cenet, and the World Intellectual Property Organization's PATENTSCOPE to search for prior art.

What is the role of patent classification in patent analysis?

Patent classification systems help in organizing patents into specific technology groupings, making it easier to find relevant prior art and related patents.

What resources are available for analyzing patent scope and claims?

Resources include the USPTO's Patent Public Search, Global Dossier, Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs), and international databases like those provided by the EPO and WIPO.

How can I determine if a patent is valid and enforceable?

Determining validity and enforceability involves analyzing the claims, prior art, and any office actions or litigation history related to the patent.

Sources

  1. USPTO: Search for patents - USPTO
  2. ACUS: U.S. Patent Small Claims Court
  3. USPTO: Patent Claims Research Dataset
  4. Brown University: Home - Patents - Library Guides at Brown University
  5. Canadian Patents Database: Patent 2569461 Summary - Canadian Patents Database

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,143,274

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.