You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 6,150,383


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,150,383
Title: Pharmaceutical composition
Abstract:Pharmaceutical composition which comprises an insulin sensitivity enhancer in combination with other antidiabetics differing from the enhancer in the mechanism of action, which shows a potent depressive effect on diabetic hyperglycemia and is useful for prophylaxis and treatment of diabetes.
Inventor(s): Ikeda; Hitoshi (Higashiosaka, JP), Sohda; Takashi (Takatsuki, JP), Odaka; Hiroyuki (Kobe, JP)
Assignee: Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd. (Osaka, JP)
Application Number:09/280,710
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 6,150,383
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 6,150,383

Introduction

Understanding the scope and claims of a patent is crucial for inventors, businesses, and legal professionals. This article will delve into the details of United States Patent 6,150,383, exploring its claims, scope, and the broader patent landscape.

Patent Overview

United States Patent 6,150,383, hereafter referred to as the '383 patent, is a specific patent that has been granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). To analyze this patent, one must first identify its key components:

Title and Abstract

The title and abstract provide a brief overview of the invention. While the specific details of the '383 patent are not provided in the sources, typically, the title and abstract give a concise description of the invention, its purpose, and its novelty.

Claims

The claims section is the most critical part of a patent as it defines the scope of the invention. Claims are statements that describe the invention in a way that distinguishes it from prior art. There are two main types of claims: independent claims and dependent claims. Independent claims stand alone and define the invention, while dependent claims refer back to and further limit the independent claims[1].

Analyzing Claims

To analyze the claims of the '383 patent, one would need to review each claim carefully:

Independent Claims

Independent claims are the broadest claims and define the core of the invention. These claims should be clear, concise, and distinguishable from prior art.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow down the invention by adding specific limitations to the independent claims. These claims help to further define the invention and can provide additional protection.

Scope of the Patent

The scope of a patent is determined by its claims. Here are some key points to consider:

Claim Construction

Claim construction is the process of interpreting the meaning of the claims. This is often a critical step in patent litigation as it determines the boundaries of what is protected by the patent[4].

Prior Art

Prior art refers to any existing knowledge or inventions that predate the filing of the patent. Ensuring that the claims of the '383 patent are novel and non-obvious over prior art is essential for its validity[1].

Patent Landscape

Understanding the broader patent landscape is vital for assessing the significance and potential impact of the '383 patent.

Related Patents

Using tools like the USPTO's Patent Public Search or the Global Dossier, one can identify related patents and patent families. This helps in understanding how the '383 patent fits into the existing body of inventions in its field[1].

International Patents

Checking international patent databases such as those provided by the European Patent Office (EPO), Japan Patent Office (JPO), and World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) can reveal whether similar inventions have been patented abroad[1].

Litigation and Enforcement

Patent litigation can significantly impact the value and enforceability of a patent.

Patent Infringement Litigation

The '383 patent, like any other, could be involved in patent infringement litigation. Factors such as the number of defendants, the type of patents involved, and recent changes in patent law (e.g., the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act) can influence litigation trends[4].

Non-Practicing Entities (NPEs)

NPEs, often referred to as patent trolls, play a significant role in patent litigation. They may acquire patents solely for the purpose of enforcing them against alleged infringers. Understanding the role of NPEs can provide context on potential litigation risks[4].

Tools and Resources

Several tools and resources are available to help analyze and understand patents:

USPTO Resources

The USPTO offers various resources such as the Patent Public Search tool, Global Dossier, and Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs) to assist in patent searches and analysis[1].

Patent Claims Research Dataset

The USPTO's Patent Claims Research Dataset provides detailed information on claims from U.S. patents and patent applications, which can be useful for analyzing claim structures and trends[3].

Best Practices for Patent Search

Conducting a thorough patent search is essential for understanding the scope and claims of a patent.

Step-by-Step Strategy

The USPTO provides a step-by-step strategy for conducting a preliminary U.S. patent search, which includes using multiple search tools and databases to ensure comprehensive coverage[1].

International Search

Searching international patent databases is crucial to ensure that the invention is novel and non-obvious on a global scale[1].

Key Takeaways

  • Claims Analysis: The claims section of a patent is critical and defines the scope of the invention.
  • Prior Art: Ensuring claims are novel and non-obvious over prior art is essential.
  • Patent Landscape: Understanding related patents and international filings is vital.
  • Litigation: Being aware of litigation trends and the role of NPEs can impact patent enforcement.
  • Resources: Utilizing USPTO resources and datasets can enhance patent analysis.

FAQs

Q: How do I find the claims of a specific patent like the '383 patent? A: You can find the claims by searching for the patent number on the USPTO's Patent Public Search tool or other patent databases.

Q: What is the importance of prior art in patent analysis? A: Prior art ensures that the patent claims are novel and non-obvious, which is a requirement for patent validity.

Q: How can I determine if a patent has been litigated? A: You can check court records and databases such as those provided by the USPTO or legal research platforms to see if the patent has been involved in litigation.

Q: What is the role of Non-Practicing Entities (NPEs) in patent litigation? A: NPEs acquire patents to enforce them against alleged infringers, often without practicing the invention themselves.

Q: Where can I find resources to help with patent searches and analysis? A: The USPTO offers several resources including the Patent Public Search tool, Global Dossier, and Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs).

Sources

  1. USPTO - Search for patents.
  2. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
  3. USPTO - Patent Claims Research Dataset.
  4. GAO - Assessing Factors That Affect Patent Infringement Litigation.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,150,383

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 6,150,383

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Japan7-153500Jun 20, 1995

International Family Members for US Patent 6,150,383

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 0861666 ⤷  Subscribe 91298 Luxembourg ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 0861666 ⤷  Subscribe 300258 Netherlands ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 0861666 ⤷  Subscribe SPC 038/2006 Ireland ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 0861666 ⤷  Subscribe 07C0006 France ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 0861666 ⤷  Subscribe CA 2007 00001 Denmark ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 0861666 ⤷  Subscribe SPC/GB07/009 United Kingdom ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 0861666 ⤷  Subscribe C00861666/01 Switzerland ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.