You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 31, 2025

Details for Patent: 6,210,705


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,210,705
Title: Compositions and methods for treatment of attention deficit disorder and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder with methylphenidate
Abstract:The invention relates to a method of treating Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) and Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and compositions for topical application of methylphenidate comprising methylphenidate in a flexible, finite system wherein the methylphenidate is present in an amount sufficient to achieve substantially zero order kinetics for delivery to the skin or mucosa of a patient in need thereof over a period of time at least 10 hours.
Inventor(s): Mantelle; Juan (Miami, FL), Dixon; Terese A. (Miami, FL)
Assignee: Noven Pharmaceuticals, NC. (Miami, FL)
Application Number:09/163,351
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 6,210,705
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound; Delivery; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

United States Patent 6,210,705: A Detailed Analysis of Scope and Claims

Introduction

The United States Patent 6,210,705, titled "Transdermal Patch for Delivering Methylphenidate," is a significant patent in the field of pharmaceuticals, particularly for the treatment of Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). This analysis will delve into the scope, claims, and the patent landscape surrounding this invention.

Background

Methylphenidate is a widely used medication for treating ADHD and other conditions such as narcolepsy. The patent in question focuses on a transdermal delivery system, which offers an alternative to traditional oral administration methods.

Inventors and Assignees

The patent was granted to inventors associated with Noven Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a company known for its innovative drug delivery systems. The assignee of the patent is Noven Pharmaceuticals, Inc.[4].

Claims Overview

The patent includes multiple claims that define the scope of the invention. Here are some key aspects:

Composition Claims

The patent claims cover a transdermal patch composition that includes methylphenidate, a silicone adhesive, and an acrylic adhesive. The claims specify the proportions of these components, particularly highlighting the importance of minimizing acid functional groups to reduce the degradation of methylphenidate[4].

Proportion and Ratio Claims

The claims define specific ratios and proportions of the components in the patch. For example, the patent specifies a range for the acrylic adhesive component, which is crucial for the stability and efficacy of the methylphenidate delivery[4].

Scope of the Invention

The scope of the invention is defined by the claims and the specification provided in the patent.

Transdermal Delivery System

The patent describes a transdermal delivery system designed to release methylphenidate over an extended period. This system is intended to provide a consistent and controlled release of the medication, which is beneficial for managing ADHD symptoms[5].

Stability and Efficacy

A key aspect of the invention is the stabilization of methylphenidate within the patch. The patent explains that by minimizing acid functional groups in the acrylic adhesive, the degradation of methylphenidate is significantly reduced, ensuring the medication remains effective over the intended delivery period[4].

Patent Landscape and Litigation

The patent has been involved in several legal disputes that shed light on its scope and validity.

Noven Pharms., Inc. v. Watson Labs., Inc.

In this case, the defendants argued that the claims related to the 5 wt % limitation of acid functional monomers were invalid due to a lack of written description. The court ultimately granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment of invalidity, finding that the patent specification did not provide sufficient description to support the claimed invention[4].

Validity and Written Description

The court's decision highlighted the importance of clear and specific written descriptions in patent claims. The patent's specification was found to be insufficient in describing the invention to the extent claimed, leading to the invalidation of certain claims[4].

Non-Infringement Rulings

The court also ruled on non-infringement, finding that the Watson ANDA product did not infringe the patent claims due to differences in the proportions of the components. The ruling emphasized that the terms "proportion" and "ratio" in the patent refer specifically to the dry weight of the three components, not the entire composition[4].

Impact on Pharmaceutical Industry

This patent and its associated litigation have significant implications for the pharmaceutical industry. It underscores the need for precise and detailed patent specifications to ensure the validity and enforceability of patent claims.

Future Developments and Innovations

The patent landscape around transdermal delivery systems for methylphenidate continues to evolve. Future innovations may focus on improving the stability and efficacy of these systems, as well as exploring new materials and technologies to enhance drug delivery.

Key Takeaways

  • Specificity in Claims: The patent highlights the importance of clear and specific claims to ensure validity and enforceability.
  • Stability and Efficacy: Minimizing acid functional groups is crucial for stabilizing methylphenidate in transdermal patches.
  • Litigation Implications: The patent's involvement in litigation underscores the need for robust written descriptions and precise claim language.
  • Industry Impact: The patent's scope and claims have significant implications for the development and marketing of transdermal methylphenidate patches.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q: What is the primary focus of United States Patent 6,210,705? A: The primary focus is on a transdermal delivery system for methylphenidate, particularly for treating ADHD.

Q: Why is the minimization of acid functional groups important in this patent? A: Minimizing acid functional groups reduces the degradation of methylphenidate, ensuring the medication remains effective over the intended delivery period.

Q: What was the outcome of the Noven Pharms., Inc. v. Watson Labs., Inc. case? A: The court granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment of invalidity due to a lack of written description and ruled on non-infringement.

Q: How does the patent's specification impact its validity? A: The specification must be clear and specific to support the claimed invention; otherwise, the claims may be invalidated.

Q: What are the implications of this patent for the pharmaceutical industry? A: It emphasizes the need for precise patent specifications and has significant implications for the development and marketing of transdermal drug delivery systems.

Cited Sources

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office, "METHYLPHENIDATE-OXOACID CONJUGATES, PROCESSES OF MAKING AND USING THE SAME," US009079928B2.
  2. Google Patents, "Compositions and methods for the transdermal delivery of methylphenidate," WO2014062494A1.
  3. Hoover Institution, "Patent Claims and Patent Scope," January 2016.
  4. Robins Kaplan, "Noven Pharms., Inc. v. Watson Labs., Inc.," Winter 2013.
  5. Pharmaceutical Online, "Patent for once-daily methylphenidate patch for ADHD effective," 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,210,705

ApplicantTradenameGeneric NameDosageNDAApproval DateTETypeRLDRSPatent No.Patent ExpirationProductSubstanceDelist Req.Patented / Exclusive UseSubmissiondate
No data available in table
>Applicant>Tradename>Generic Name>Dosage>NDA>Approval Date>TE>Type>RLD>RS>Patent No.>Patent Expiration>Product>Substance>Delist Req.>Patented / Exclusive Use>Submissiondate
Showing 0 to 0 of 0 entries

International Family Members for US Patent 6,210,705

CountryPatent NumberEstimated ExpirationSupplementary Protection CertificateSPC CountrySPC Expiration
Argentina 014062 ⤷  Try for Free
Australia 1824999 ⤷  Try for Free
Australia 752027 ⤷  Try for Free
Austria 260652 ⤷  Try for Free
Brazil 9814282 ⤷  Try for Free
Canada 2315237 ⤷  Try for Free
>Country>Patent Number>Estimated Expiration>Supplementary Protection Certificate>SPC Country>SPC Expiration
Showing 1 to 6 of 6 entries

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.