You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 6,299,900


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,299,900
Title: Dermal penetration enhancers and drug delivery systems involving same
Abstract:A transdermal drug delivery system which comprises at least one physiologically active agent or prodrug thereof and at least one dermal penetration enhancer; characterized in that the dermal penetration enhancer is a safe skin-tolerant ester sunscreen. A non-occlusive, percutaneous or transdermal drug delivery system which comprises: (i) an effective amount of at least one physiologically active agent or prodrug thereof; (ii) at least one non-volatile dermal penetration enhancer; and (iii) at least one volatile liquid; characterised in that the dermal penetration enhancer is adapted to transport the physiologically active agent across a dermal surface or mucosal membrane of an animal, including a human, when the volatile liquid evaporates, to form a reservoir or depot of a mixture comprising the penetration enhancer and the physiologically active agent or prodrug within said surface or membrane; and the dermal penetration enhancer is of low toxicity to, and is tolerated by, the dermal surface or mucosal membrane of the animal.
Inventor(s): Reed; Barry Leonard (Strathmore, AU), Morgan; Timothy Matthias (Parkville, AU), Finnin; Barrie Charles (Glen Iris, AU)
Assignee: Monash University (Victoria, AU)
Application Number:09/125,436
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Delivery; Compound; Use; Device;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

United States Patent 6,299,900: A Detailed Analysis of Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

The United States Patent 6,299,900, titled "Dermal Penetration Enhancers and Drug Delivery Systems Involving Same," is a significant patent in the field of pharmaceuticals, particularly in the area of transdermal drug delivery. This patent, assigned to Acrux DDS Pty Ltd., has been a focal point in several legal and technological discussions.

Background and Invention Overview

The patent, filed on February 19, 1997, and granted on October 9, 2001, describes a transdermal drug delivery system that includes at least one physiologically active agent or prodrug and at least one dermal penetration enhancer. This system is designed to improve the delivery of drugs through the skin, enhancing the efficacy and convenience of treatment[4].

Claims of the Patent

The patent includes multiple claims that define the scope of the invention. Here are some key claims:

  • Claim 1: A transdermal drug delivery system comprising at least one physiologically active agent or prodrug thereof and at least one dermal penetration enhancer.
  • Claim 2: The system of claim 1, wherein the dermal penetration enhancer is selected from a group of compounds including fatty acids, fatty acid esters, and terpenes.
  • Claim 3: The system of claim 1, wherein the physiologically active agent is a steroid or a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)[4].

Scope of the Patent

The scope of the patent is broad, covering various aspects of transdermal drug delivery systems. It includes:

  • Dermal Penetration Enhancers: The patent specifies various types of dermal penetration enhancers that can be used to facilitate the delivery of drugs through the skin.
  • Physiologically Active Agents: The patent covers a wide range of active agents, including steroids and NSAIDs, which can be delivered using the system.
  • Drug Delivery Systems: The patent describes the composition and method of preparing the transdermal drug delivery system, including the use of patches, gels, and other formulations[4].

Patent Landscape and Related Patents

The patent 6,299,900 is part of a larger family of patents related to transdermal drug delivery systems. Here are some related patents and their significance:

  • Continuation and Divisional Patents: This patent is a continuation of earlier applications, including PCT/AU97/00091 and US09/910,780, and is related to other patents such as 6,818,226 and 6,923,983[1][5].
  • Later Patents: Subsequent patents like 8,071,075 and 8,435,944 build upon the technology described in the '900 patent, further refining and expanding the scope of transdermal drug delivery systems[2][5].

Litigation and Infringement Claims

The '900 patent has been involved in several litigation cases, particularly in the context of generic pharmaceuticals:

  • Eli Lilly and Company vs. Perrigo Company: This case involves allegations of patent infringement related to the commercial manufacture and sale of generic versions of Eli Lilly's Axiron® (testosterone) product. The defendants argued that the '900 patent claims are invalid, unenforceable, or would not be infringed by their generic product[5].
  • Actavis Laboratories: Similar infringement claims were made against Actavis Laboratories, where the plaintiffs alleged that Actavis's submission of an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) to the FDA constituted an act of infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(2)[2].

Impact on Pharmaceutical Industry

The '900 patent has significant implications for the pharmaceutical industry:

  • Innovation: The patent has driven innovation in transdermal drug delivery, encouraging the development of more effective and convenient drug delivery systems.
  • Litigation Costs: The involvement of this patent in various litigation cases highlights the complexities and costs associated with patent disputes in the pharmaceutical sector[3][5].

Patent Scope Metrics

The scope of the '900 patent can be analyzed using metrics such as independent claim length and count. Research suggests that narrower claims, like those in this patent, are associated with a higher probability of grant and a shorter examination process[3].

Expiry and Legal Status

The '900 patent has expired, which means that the technology described is now in the public domain. However, the legal battles surrounding this patent have set important precedents for future patent disputes[4].

Key Takeaways

  • Transdermal Drug Delivery: The '900 patent is a cornerstone in the development of transdermal drug delivery systems.
  • Broad Scope: The patent covers a wide range of dermal penetration enhancers and physiologically active agents.
  • Litigation: The patent has been central in several high-profile litigation cases involving generic pharmaceutical companies.
  • Innovation: Despite its expiry, the patent continues to influence innovation in drug delivery systems.
  • Patent Landscape: It is part of a complex patent landscape with multiple related patents and continuations.

FAQs

Q: What is the main invention described in the '900 patent?

A: The main invention is a transdermal drug delivery system that includes at least one physiologically active agent or prodrug and at least one dermal penetration enhancer.

Q: Which companies have been involved in litigation related to the '900 patent?

A: Companies such as Eli Lilly and Company, Acrux DDS Pty Ltd., Perrigo Company, and Actavis Laboratories have been involved in litigation related to this patent.

Q: What are the implications of the '900 patent for the pharmaceutical industry?

A: The patent has driven innovation in transdermal drug delivery and has been a focal point in discussions about patent scope and litigation costs.

Q: Is the '900 patent still in force?

A: No, the '900 patent has expired, and the technology described is now in the public domain.

Q: How can the scope of the '900 patent be measured?

A: The scope can be measured using metrics such as independent claim length and count, which indicate that narrower claims are associated with a higher probability of grant and a shorter examination process.

Cited Sources

  1. US8071075B2 - Dermal penetration enhancers and drug delivery systems involving the same.
  2. Insight.rpxcorp.com - Litigation Documents.
  3. SSRN - Patent Claims and Patent Scope.
  4. Google Patents - US6299900B1 - Dermal penetration enhancers and drug delivery systems involving same.
  5. Insight.rpxcorp.com - UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,299,900

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 6,299,900

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
AustraliaPN 8144Feb 19, 1996
PCT Information
PCT FiledFebruary 19, 1997PCT Application Number:PCT/AU97/00091
PCT Publication Date:August 21, 1997PCT Publication Number: WO97/29735

International Family Members for US Patent 6,299,900

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 0901368 ⤷  Subscribe C300523 Netherlands ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 0901368 ⤷  Subscribe CA 2012 00010 Denmark ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 0901368 ⤷  Subscribe 91973 Luxembourg ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 1769785 ⤷  Subscribe C300522 Netherlands ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 1769785 ⤷  Subscribe C300521 Netherlands ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 1769785 ⤷  Subscribe CA 2012 00011 Denmark ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.