You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 6,320,074


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,320,074
Title: Compounds having selective activity for retinoid X receptors, and means for modulation of processes mediated by retinoid X receptors
Abstract:Compounds, compositions, and methods for modulating processes mediated by Retinoid X Receptors using retinoid-like compounds which have activity selective for members of the subclass of Retinoid X Receptors (RXRs), in preference to members of the subclass of Retinoic Acid Receptors (RARs). Examples of such compounds are bicyclic benzyl, pyridinyl, thiophene, furanyl, and pyrrole derivatives. The disclosed methods employ compounds for modulating processes selectively mediated by Retinoid X Receptors.
Inventor(s): Boehm; Marcus F. (San Diego, CA), Heyman; Richard A. (Encinitas, CA), Zhi; Lin (San Diego, CA), Koch; Stacie Canan (San Diego, CA)
Assignee: Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (San Diego, CA)
Application Number:09/179,674
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Composition; Dosage form; Process; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 6,320,074

Introduction

Understanding the scope and claims of a patent is crucial for determining its validity, enforceability, and potential impact on the market. This article will delve into the details of United States Patent 6,320,074, exploring its claims, scope, and the broader patent landscape.

Patent Overview

United States Patent 6,320,074 was granted on November 20, 2001. To analyze this patent, one must first identify its title, inventors, assignees, and the technological field it pertains to.

Title and Abstract

The title of the patent provides a brief description of the invention. For example, if the patent is titled "Method and Apparatus for [Specific Technology]," the abstract will offer a concise summary of the invention, including its key features and objectives.

Claims

The claims section is the most critical part of a patent as it defines the scope of the invention. There are two types of claims: independent and dependent.

Independent Claims

Independent claims stand alone and define the invention without reference to other claims. They are typically broader and more comprehensive.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refer back to an independent claim and further limit the scope of the invention. They often add specific details or variations to the independent claims.

Claim Construction

Claim construction is the process of interpreting the meaning of the claims. This is often a point of contention in patent litigation. The court's interpretation of claim terms can significantly affect the patent's scope and validity[5].

Patent Scope

The scope of a patent is determined by the claims and the specification (description and drawings). Here are some key aspects to consider:

Prior Art

Prior art refers to existing knowledge and inventions in the field that predate the patent application. Conducting a thorough prior art search using resources like the USPTO's Patent Public Search, Espacenet, and Patentscope can help in understanding the novelty and non-obviousness of the invention[1][4].

Novelty and Non-Obviousness

To be patentable, an invention must be novel and non-obvious. The claims must not be anticipated by prior art, and they must represent a significant improvement over existing technologies.

Patent Landscape

The patent landscape includes all related patents and patent applications in the same technological field. Here are some tools and strategies for analyzing the patent landscape:

Global Dossier

The Global Dossier service provided by the USPTO allows users to view the patent family for a specific application, including related applications filed at participating IP Offices. This helps in understanding the global reach and relatedness of the patent[1].

Common Citation Document (CCD)

The CCD application consolidates prior art citations from multiple patent offices, providing a comprehensive view of the prior art landscape for a particular patent family[1].

International Patent Offices

Searching international patent databases such as those provided by the European Patent Office (EPO), Japan Patent Office (JPO), and World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) can reveal similar inventions or improvements in other jurisdictions[1].

Economic and Legal Implications

Patent Claims Research Dataset

The USPTO's Patent Claims Research Dataset provides detailed information on claims from U.S. patents and applications, which can be used to analyze the scope and trends of patent claims. This dataset can help in understanding the economic and legal implications of the patent claims[3].

Litigation and Enforcement

Patent litigation, such as the case of Contour IP Holding LLC v. GoPro, Inc., highlights the importance of claim construction and the enforcement of patent rights. Understanding the legal framework and precedents is crucial for navigating patent disputes[5].

Practical Steps for Analysis

Step 1: Identify the Patent

Locate the patent on the USPTO website or other patent databases to access the full text, including the claims, description, and drawings.

Step 2: Analyze the Claims

Carefully read and interpret the independent and dependent claims to understand the scope of the invention.

Step 3: Conduct Prior Art Search

Use various patent search tools to identify prior art that may affect the novelty and non-obviousness of the invention.

Step 4: Examine the Patent Landscape

Utilize tools like Global Dossier and CCD to understand the global and related patent landscape.

Step 5: Evaluate Economic and Legal Implications

Use datasets and legal precedents to assess the economic value and legal enforceability of the patent.

Key Takeaways

  • Claims Analysis: The claims section is pivotal in defining the scope of the patent.
  • Prior Art Search: Conducting a thorough prior art search is essential for determining novelty and non-obviousness.
  • Global Perspective: Analyzing the global patent landscape helps in understanding the broader implications of the patent.
  • Economic and Legal Considerations: Understanding the economic and legal implications is crucial for enforcing and valuing the patent.
  • Tools and Resources: Utilize resources like the USPTO's Patent Public Search, Global Dossier, and CCD to facilitate the analysis.

FAQs

Q: What is the importance of claim construction in patent analysis? A: Claim construction is critical as it determines the scope of the patent and can significantly affect its validity and enforceability in litigation.

Q: How can I conduct a prior art search for a patent? A: Use resources like the USPTO's Patent Public Search, Espacenet, and Patentscope to search for existing patents and publications that may affect the novelty and non-obviousness of the invention.

Q: What is the Global Dossier service? A: The Global Dossier service allows users to view the patent family for a specific application, including related applications filed at participating IP Offices.

Q: How can I analyze the economic implications of a patent? A: Use datasets like the USPTO's Patent Claims Research Dataset to analyze trends and scope of patent claims, and consider legal precedents to assess economic value.

Q: Why is it important to search international patent databases? A: Searching international patent databases helps in understanding the global reach and relatedness of the patent, which is crucial for international enforcement and valuation.

Sources

  1. USPTO - Search for patents: https://www.uspto.gov/patents/search
  2. ACUS - U.S. Patent Small Claims Court: https://www.acus.gov/research-projects/us-patent-small-claims-court
  3. USPTO - Patent Claims Research Dataset: https://www.uspto.gov/ip-policy/economic-research/research-datasets/patent-claims-research-dataset
  4. Harvard Business School - Patent search: A comparative table of databases: https://asklib.library.hbs.edu/faq/266950
  5. CAFC - CONTOUR IP HOLDING LLC v. GOPRO, INC.: https://cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions-orders/22-1654.OPINION.9-9-2024_2381170.pdf

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,320,074

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 6,320,074

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 0637297 ⤷  Subscribe 01C0027 France ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 0637297 ⤷  Subscribe SPC013/2001 Ireland ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 0637297 ⤷  Subscribe CA 2001 00032 Denmark ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 0637297 ⤷  Subscribe C300054 Netherlands ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 0637297 ⤷  Subscribe SPC/GB01/041 United Kingdom ⤷  Subscribe
Austria 177733 ⤷  Subscribe
Austria 187434 ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.