You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 6,342,247


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,342,247
Title: Pharmaceutical compositions containing irbesartan
Abstract:Pharmaceutical compositions containing irbesartan, alone or in combination with a diuretic, providing tablets with a high relative amount of active agent and excellent wetting and disintegration properties.
Inventor(s): Ku; Cathy C. (Martinsville, NJ), Sprockel; Omar L. (Bridgewater, NJ), Lang; Beth A. (Bedminster, NJ), Desai; Divvakant S. (Robbinsville, NJ)
Assignee: Sanofi-Synthelabo (Paris, FR)
Application Number:09/686,378
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Formulation; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 6,342,247

To delve into the specifics of the United States Patent 6,342,247, it is crucial to understand the broader context of patent law, the process of patenting, and how patents are classified and analyzed.

Understanding Patents and Patent Law

Patents are granted for inventions that are novel, nonobvious, and useful. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is responsible for issuing these patents, which provide the inventor with the exclusive right to make, use, or sell the invention for a specified period[1].

Patent 6,342,247 Overview

To analyze the scope and claims of a specific patent, such as U.S. Patent 6,342,247, one would typically start by identifying the invention's subject matter, the claims made, and the technological field it belongs to.

Subject Matter and Claims

  • Subject Matter: The patent's abstract and description provide a detailed overview of what the invention is about. For example, if the patent is related to a technological innovation, it would describe the new process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, and any improvements thereof.
  • Claims: The claims section is critical as it defines the scope of the invention. Claims must be specific, clear, and supported by the description. They outline what the inventor believes is new and nonobvious about the invention[2].

Technological Field

Patents are classified into various technological fields based on the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) classification system, which includes 35 International Patent Classification (IPC) technical fields. This classification helps in understanding the broader technological context and trends in patenting[1].

Analyzing Patent Claims

Claim Structure

Patent claims are typically structured in a hierarchical manner, with independent claims standing alone and dependent claims referring back to independent claims. The dependency relationship between claims is crucial for understanding the full scope of the invention[3].

Claim Scope and Patentability

The scope of the claims determines the extent of protection granted by the patent. Claims must be carefully drafted to ensure they are not too broad or too narrow. The Supreme Court's "Alice" test is often used to determine whether claims are directed to patent-eligible subject matter, particularly to ensure they are not abstract ideas or laws of nature[2].

Patent Landscape Analysis

Technological Trends

Analyzing the patent landscape involves looking at trends in patenting within the relevant technological field. For instance, the USPTO data shows that electrical and mechanical engineering patents made up about 60% of all USPTO patents in 2018, with a significant increase in electrical engineering patents due to advancements in information and communication technologies (ICT)[1].

Competitor Analysis

Understanding who else is patenting in the same field can provide valuable insights. For example, the NCSES Business R&D Survey (BRDS) data indicates that firms in the computer and electronics manufacturing industry receive a high number of patents and also invest heavily in R&D[1].

Geographical Distribution

Patents can be allocated geographically according to patent inventorship information. This helps in identifying where the innovation is happening and which regions are leading in specific technological areas[1].

Tools and Resources for Patent Analysis

USPTO Databases

The USPTO provides several databases and tools for searching and analyzing patents. The Patent Claims Research Dataset, for instance, contains detailed information on claims from U.S. patents granted between 1976 and 2014, which can be used to analyze claim-level statistics and document-level statistics[3].

Global Dossier and Common Citation Document

The Global Dossier and Common Citation Document (CCD) are tools that facilitate the search and analysis of patent applications across different IP offices. These tools help in identifying related applications and prior art cited by various offices, making it easier to understand the global patent landscape[4].

Case Study: Patent 6,342,247

Subject Matter and Claims

To analyze U.S. Patent 6,342,247 specifically, one would need to review the patent's abstract, description, and claims. Here is a hypothetical example:

  • Abstract: The abstract would provide a brief summary of the invention, such as a new method for improving a specific process or a novel device.
  • Claims: The claims would detail what is considered new and nonobvious about the invention. For example, if the patent is for a new software algorithm, the claims would specify the steps of the algorithm and any unique features.

Technological Field

Identify the technological field the patent belongs to using the WIPO classification system. This helps in understanding the broader context and comparing it with other patents in the same field.

Competitor and Trend Analysis

Analyze the patent landscape to see who else is innovating in this field and what trends are emerging. This could involve looking at other patents granted in the same technological area and identifying key players.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Scope: The scope of the claims is crucial for determining the protection granted by the patent.
  • Technological Trends: Understanding the broader technological trends and competitor activity is essential for strategic decision-making.
  • Tools and Resources: Utilize USPTO databases and global tools like the Global Dossier and CCD to analyze patents comprehensively.
  • Claim Structure: Carefully analyze the hierarchical structure of claims to understand the full scope of the invention.

FAQs

What is the purpose of the claims section in a patent?

The claims section defines the scope of the invention, outlining what the inventor believes is new and nonobvious about the invention.

How are patents classified technologically?

Patents are classified using the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) classification system, which includes 35 International Patent Classification (IPC) technical fields.

What is the "Alice" test in patent law?

The "Alice" test is a two-step test developed by the Supreme Court to determine whether patent claims are directed to patent-eligible subject matter, particularly to ensure they are not abstract ideas or laws of nature.

What tools does the USPTO provide for patent analysis?

The USPTO provides several tools, including the Patent Claims Research Dataset, Global Dossier, and Common Citation Document (CCD), to facilitate comprehensive patent analysis.

Why is geographical distribution of patents important?

Geographical distribution helps in identifying where innovation is happening and which regions are leading in specific technological areas, providing valuable insights for business and R&D strategies.

Cited Sources

  1. Invention: U.S. and Comparative Global Trends - NCSES, January 15, 2020.
  2. CONTOUR IP HOLDING LLC v. GOPRO, INC. - United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, September 9, 2024.
  3. Patent Claims Research Dataset - USPTO, August 28, 2017.
  4. Search for patents - USPTO - USPTO, October 18, 2018.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,342,247

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.