You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 14, 2025

Details for Patent: 6,358,527


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,358,527
Title: Fast-dissolving galanthamine hydrobromide tablet
Abstract:The present invention is concerned with a fast-dissolving tablet for oral administration comprising as an active ingredient a therapeutically effective amount of galanthamine hydrobromide (1:1) and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, characterized in that said carrier comprises a spray dried mixture of lactose monohydrate and microcrystalline cellulose (75:25) as a diluent, and a disintegrant; and with a direct compression process of preparing such fast-dissolving tablets.
Inventor(s): Gilis; Paul Marie Victor (Beerse, BE), De Conde ; Valentin Florent Victor (Lommel, BE)
Assignee: Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V. (Beerse, BE)
Application Number:09/585,122
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of a Patent: A Detailed Guide Using United States Patent 6,358,527 as an Example

Introduction

When analyzing a patent, understanding its scope and claims is crucial for determining its validity, enforceability, and the protection it offers. This article will delve into the process of analyzing the scope and claims of a patent, using United States Patent 6,358,527 as a practical example.

Understanding Patent Claims

Patent claims are the most critical part of a patent application, as they define the scope of the invention and what is protected by the patent. Claims are typically categorized into independent and dependent claims, with independent claims standing alone and dependent claims referring back to an independent claim[3].

Identifying the Patent

United States Patent 6,358,527 is a specific example that we will use to illustrate the analysis process. To start, one would need to locate the patent document through databases such as the USPTO's Patent Public Search tool or other international patent databases[1].

Reading the Patent Specification

The patent specification includes a detailed description of the invention, drawings, and the claims. It is essential to read through the specification to understand the context and the specific elements of the invention.

Claim Structure

  • Independent Claims: These claims define the broadest scope of the invention and are not dependent on other claims.
  • Dependent Claims: These claims narrow down the scope of the invention by adding additional limitations to an independent claim.

Claim Analysis

For each claim, identify the key elements and limitations. For example, if the patent is for a mechanical device, the claims might include specific components, their relationships, and how they function together.

Scope Concepts and Claim Coverage

To analyze the scope of the patent effectively, it is helpful to categorize the claims by scope concepts. This involves grouping claims based on the overarching ideas or technologies they cover. This method, often used in patent analytics, helps in filtering, searching, and accurately analyzing large numbers of patent claims concurrently[3].

Claim Coverage Matrix

A Claim Coverage Matrix is a tool that shows which patents and claims are actively protecting the intellectual property and where gaps or opportunities exist. This matrix can help in understanding the breadth of protection offered by the patent and identifying any potential vulnerabilities or areas for improvement[3].

Patent Landscape Analysis

Analyzing the patent landscape involves looking at the broader context of related patents and technologies. This includes:

Global Dossier

Using tools like the Global Dossier, you can see the patent family for a specific application, including all related applications filed at participating IP Offices. This helps in understanding how the patent fits into the global intellectual property landscape[1].

Common Citation Document (CCD)

The CCD application provides a single point of access to citation data relating to the patent applications of the IP5 Offices. This helps in visualizing the prior art cited by multiple offices for the same invention, which is crucial for understanding the novelty and non-obviousness of the patent[1].

Legal and Regulatory Considerations

False Claims of Patent Protection

It is important to ensure that any claims made about the patent are accurate and not misleading. False claims of patent protection can lead to false advertising claims under the Lanham Act, as seen in cases like Crocs, Inc. v. Effervescent, Inc.[2].

Patent Marking and Deceptive Intent

Section 292 of the Patent Act prohibits false patent marking, but it requires that the false marking be made "for the purpose of deceiving the public." In contrast, the Lanham Act does not require deceptive intent, making any false or misleading statement about a product's nature, characteristics, or qualities potentially actionable[2].

Practical Tools and Resources

Patent Public Search

The USPTO's Patent Public Search tool is a powerful resource for searching prior art and understanding the patent landscape. It offers two modern interfaces that enhance access to prior art[1].

Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs)

Local PTRCs provide training in patent search techniques and maintain local search resources, which can be invaluable for conducting a thorough analysis[1].

Patent Analytics Software

Tools like ClaimScape® software help in generating interactive claim charts that can be reviewed by technical experts to determine the applicability of scope concepts to target products or methods. These charts can highlight gaps in current coverage and future design opportunities[3].

Case Study: United States Patent 6,358,527

To illustrate the process, let's consider a hypothetical analysis of United States Patent 6,358,527.

Step-by-Step Analysis

  1. Locate the Patent: Use the USPTO's Patent Public Search tool to find the patent document.
  2. Read the Specification: Understand the invention's context, components, and how they function.
  3. Analyze Claims: Identify independent and dependent claims, and categorize them by scope concepts.
  4. Create a Claim Coverage Matrix: Determine which claims are actively protecting the intellectual property and where gaps exist.
  5. Analyze the Patent Landscape: Use tools like the Global Dossier and CCD to understand the global context.
  6. Ensure Compliance with Legal Standards: Verify that any marketing or advertising claims are accurate to avoid false advertising claims.

Key Takeaways

  • Understand Claims: Claims define the scope of the invention and are crucial for determining patent validity.
  • Scope Concepts: Categorizing claims by scope concepts helps in analyzing large numbers of claims efficiently.
  • Patent Landscape: Analyzing related patents and technologies provides a broader understanding of the intellectual property landscape.
  • Legal Compliance: Ensure that all claims made about the patent are accurate to avoid legal issues.
  • Use Practical Tools: Utilize resources like the USPTO's Patent Public Search tool and patent analytics software to streamline the analysis process.

FAQs

Q: What is the importance of understanding patent claims?

Understanding patent claims is crucial because they define the scope of the invention and what is protected by the patent. This helps in determining the patent's validity and enforceability.

Q: How can I analyze the scope of a patent effectively?

To analyze the scope of a patent effectively, categorize the claims by scope concepts, use tools like the Claim Coverage Matrix, and analyze the patent landscape using resources such as the Global Dossier and CCD.

Q: What are the legal implications of false patent marking?

False patent marking can lead to claims under the Lanham Act for false advertising, and under Section 292 of the Patent Act if done with the intent to deceive the public.

Q: What resources are available for conducting a thorough patent search?

Resources include the USPTO's Patent Public Search tool, Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs), and international patent databases such as those provided by the European Patent Office and WIPO.

Q: How can patent analytics software help in managing patent claims?

Patent analytics software, such as ClaimScape®, helps in generating interactive claim charts, identifying gaps in coverage, and highlighting future design opportunities, making it easier to manage and analyze large numbers of patent claims.

Sources

  1. USPTO: Search for patents - USPTO
  2. Fenwick: False Claims of Patent Protection Can Be False Advertising Under…
  3. SLWIP: Patent Analytics | Intellectual Property Law
  4. Princeton: Patent Databases and Agencies - Research Guides
  5. ACUS: U.S. Patent Small Claims Court

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,358,527

ApplicantTradenameGeneric NameDosageNDAApproval DateTETypeRLDRSPatent No.Patent ExpirationProductSubstanceDelist Req.Patented / Exclusive UseSubmissiondate
No data available in table
>Applicant>Tradename>Generic Name>Dosage>NDA>Approval Date>TE>Type>RLD>RS>Patent No.>Patent Expiration>Product>Substance>Delist Req.>Patented / Exclusive Use>Submissiondate
Showing 0 to 0 of 0 entries

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 6,358,527

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
96201676Jun 14, 1996

International Family Members for US Patent 6,358,527

CountryPatent NumberEstimated ExpirationSupplementary Protection CertificateSPC CountrySPC Expiration
Argentina 008237 ⤷  Try for Free
Argentina 070670 ⤷  Try for Free
Australia 3174397 ⤷  Try for Free
Australia 726212 ⤷  Try for Free
Austria 285777 ⤷  Try for Free
Bulgaria 102991 ⤷  Try for Free
>Country>Patent Number>Estimated Expiration>Supplementary Protection Certificate>SPC Country>SPC Expiration
Showing 1 to 6 of 6 entries

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.