You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 17, 2025

Details for Patent: 6,451,289


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,451,289
Title: Albuterol formulations
Abstract:Albuterol formulations packaged in an oxygen-permeable plastic container have a long shelf life at room temperature. The formulations consist essentially of albuterol or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, sodium chloride, and water, have a pH of about 4, and contain less than 0.08% by weight of albuterol aldehyde and less than 1 ppm dissolved oxygen.
Inventor(s): Wherry, III; Robert J. (Nashua, NH), Mueller; Stewart H. (Sudbury, MA)
Assignee: Sepracor Inc. (Marlborough, MA)
Application Number:09/815,150
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Formulation; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

United States Patent 6,451,289: A Detailed Analysis of Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

The United States Patent 6,451,289, hereafter referred to as the '289 patent, is a significant patent in the pharmaceutical industry, particularly related to the drug Xopenex (levalbuterol). This patent has been at the center of several legal battles involving generic drug manufacturers and the original patent holder, Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. Here, we will delve into the scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape surrounding this patent.

Background of the Patent

The '289 patent was listed in the FDA's Orange Book, a publication that contains information about patents related to approved drugs, along with the expiration dates of these patents. The patent was granted for a specific formulation of levalbuterol, a medication used for the treatment of asthma and other respiratory conditions[2].

Scope and Claims of the Patent

The '289 patent covers a specific formulation of levalbuterol, which is a key component of Xopenex. The claims of the patent are directed towards the composition and method of use of this formulation. Here are some key aspects of the patent's scope:

  • Composition: The patent describes a specific formulation of levalbuterol, including the active ingredients, excipients, and the method of preparation.
  • Method of Use: It outlines the dosage and administration method for the drug, which is crucial for its therapeutic efficacy.
  • Exclusivity: The patent provided Sunovion with exclusivity rights for the specified formulation, preventing generic manufacturers from entering the market until the patent's expiration[1][2].

Patent Landscape Analysis

To understand the '289 patent within the broader patent landscape, it is essential to analyze the following aspects:

Type of Patents

The '289 patent is part of a group of patents listed in the Orange Book for Xopenex. These patents include U.S. Patent No. 5,362,755 and U.S. Patent No. 5,547,994, which expired earlier than the '289 patent[1].

Direction of the Domain

The pharmaceutical domain, particularly respiratory drugs, is highly competitive and innovative. The '289 patent represents a specific innovation in the formulation of levalbuterol, indicating the direction of research and development in this field towards more effective and stable formulations.

White Space and Explored Areas

A patent landscape analysis would reveal that while the '289 patent covers a specific formulation, there are other areas within respiratory drug formulations that remain unexplored or under-explored. For instance, new delivery mechanisms, such as inhalable suspensions, are areas of ongoing research and development[4].

Competition and Market

The competition in the respiratory drug market is intense, with multiple players vying for market share. The '289 patent was a significant barrier to entry for generic manufacturers until its expiration. The legal battles surrounding this patent highlight the strategic importance of patent management in this market[1][2].

Legal Battles and Declaratory Judgment Actions

The '289 patent was at the center of a significant legal dispute involving Dey Pharma, LP (a subsidiary of Mylan) and Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc.

  • Initial ANDA Filings: The first ANDA (Abbreviated New Drug Application) for generic Xopenex was filed by Breath Ltd., followed by a second ANDA filing by Dey Pharma, LP. Sunovion sued both companies over various patents listed in the Orange Book but did not initially assert the '289 patent against Dey[1][2].
  • Declaratory Judgment Action: Dey Pharma, LP brought a declaratory judgment action seeking a declaration that the '289 patent was invalid or not infringed by their ANDA products. This action was crucial as it aimed to trigger the exclusivity period of the first ANDA filer and address the potential barrier posed by the '289 patent[1][2].

Court Decisions and Jurisdiction

The Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's decision that declaratory-judgment jurisdiction existed over Dey's claim. The court held that even though Sunovion provided a covenant not to sue on the '289 patent, the potential barrier posed by this patent to Dey's market entry was a cognizable injury that could be addressed through the declaratory judgment action[2].

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Exclusivity: The '289 patent provided Sunovion with exclusivity rights for a specific formulation of levalbuterol until its expiration in 2021.
  • Legal Strategies: The case highlights the strategic use of declaratory judgment actions by generic manufacturers to address potential patent barriers and trigger exclusivity periods.
  • Patent Landscape: The patent landscape analysis reveals the competitive and innovative nature of the respiratory drug market, with ongoing research in new formulations and delivery mechanisms.
  • Jurisdiction and Court Decisions: The Federal Circuit's decision affirmed the jurisdiction over declaratory judgment actions for patents listed in the Orange Book, even when a covenant not to sue is provided.

FAQs

What is the significance of the '289 patent in the pharmaceutical industry?

The '289 patent is significant because it covers a specific formulation of levalbuterol, a medication used for treating asthma and other respiratory conditions, and provided exclusivity rights to Sunovion until its expiration.

Why did Dey Pharma, LP bring a declaratory judgment action against Sunovion?

Dey Pharma, LP brought a declaratory judgment action to seek a declaration that the '289 patent was invalid or not infringed by their ANDA products, aiming to address the potential barrier posed by this patent and trigger the exclusivity period of the first ANDA filer.

What was the outcome of the declaratory judgment action in the Federal Circuit?

The Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's decision that declaratory-judgment jurisdiction existed over Dey's claim, even after Sunovion provided a covenant not to sue on the '289 patent.

How does patent landscape analysis help in understanding the '289 patent?

Patent landscape analysis helps in understanding the '289 patent by revealing the competitive landscape, the direction of research and development, and the white space within the respiratory drug formulations.

What are the implications of the '289 patent's expiration for the market?

The expiration of the '289 patent allowed generic manufacturers to enter the market, increasing competition and potentially reducing the cost of the medication for consumers.

Sources

  1. Dey Pharma, LP v. Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. - Casetext
  2. Dey Pharma, LP v. Sunovion Pharma. Inc. - Robins Kaplan
  3. How Patent Landscape Analysis Can Help You Enhance Your R&D Strategy - Sagacious Research
  4. United States Patent 8,367,734 B1 - Google Patents
  5. Drug Patent 6,451,289 - Drug Patent Watch

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,451,289

ApplicantTradenameGeneric NameDosageNDAApproval DateTETypeRLDRSPatent No.Patent ExpirationProductSubstanceDelist Req.Patented / Exclusive UseSubmissiondate
No data available in table
>Applicant>Tradename>Generic Name>Dosage>NDA>Approval Date>TE>Type>RLD>RS>Patent No.>Patent Expiration>Product>Substance>Delist Req.>Patented / Exclusive Use>Submissiondate
Showing 0 to 0 of 0 entries

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.