You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 5, 2025

Details for Patent: 6,537,983


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,537,983
Title: Anti-inflammatory androstane derivatives
Abstract:According to one aspect of the invention, there is provided a pharmaceutical formulation for administration by inhalation comprising a compound of formula (I), ##STR1## wherein R.sub.1 represents C.sub.1-6 alkyl or C.sub.1-6 haloalkyl; R.sub.2 represents --C(.dbd.O)-aryl or --C(.dbd.O)-heteroaryl; R.sub.3 represents hydrogen, methyl (which may be in either the .alpha. or .beta. configuration) or methylene; R.sub.4 and R.sub.5 are the same or different and each represents hydrogen or halogen; and ----- represents a single or a double bond; and salts and solvates thereof together with a long-acting .beta..sub.2 -adrenoreceptor agonist which formulation has a therapeutically useful effect in the treatment of inflammatory disorders of the respiratory tract over a period of 24 hours or more.
Inventor(s): Biggadike; Keith (Stevenage, GB), Jones; Paul Spencer (Stevenage, GB), Payne; Jeremy John (Stevenage, GB)
Assignee: SmithKline Beecham Corporation (Philadelphia, PA)
Application Number:10/066,961
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Formulation; Compound; Use; Composition; Delivery;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 6,537,983: A Comprehensive Guide

Introduction

Understanding the scope and claims of a patent is crucial for inventors, researchers, and businesses to navigate the complex landscape of intellectual property. This article will delve into the specifics of United States Patent 6,537,983, providing a detailed analysis of its claims, scope, and the broader patent landscape.

Understanding Patent Claims

Before diving into the specifics of US Patent 6,537,983, it is essential to understand what patent claims are. Patent claims define the scope of protection granted by a patent and are the legal boundaries of what the inventor can exclude others from making, using, or selling[5].

The Patent in Question: US 6,537,983

To analyze the scope and claims of US Patent 6,537,983, one must first identify the key elements of the patent.

Title and Abstract

The title and abstract provide a preliminary overview of the invention. For example, if the patent is related to a pharmaceutical formulation, the title might reflect this, and the abstract would summarize the main components and uses of the invention.

Background of the Invention

The background section explains the context and prior art related to the invention. This helps in understanding why the invention was necessary and how it improves upon existing solutions.

Detailed Description of the Invention

This section provides a detailed explanation of the invention, including its components, processes, and any specific embodiments. For a pharmaceutical formulation, this might include the composition of the formulation, the method of preparation, and any specific therapeutic uses.

Claims

The claims section is the most critical part of the patent as it defines the legal scope of the invention. Claims can be independent or dependent and must be clear, concise, and fully supported by the description[5].

Analyzing the Claims of US 6,537,983

To analyze the claims of US 6,537,983, one would typically follow these steps:

Identify Independent Claims

Independent claims stand alone and do not refer to any other claims. These claims define the broadest scope of the invention.

Identify Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refer back to and further limit the independent claims. They often provide additional details or specific embodiments of the invention.

Claim Construction

Claim construction involves interpreting the meaning of the claims. This is a critical step in determining the scope of the patent and is often a point of contention in patent litigation.

Scope of Protection

The scope of protection is determined by the claims and is presumed valid unless proven otherwise[5].

Presumption of Validity

Each claim of a patent is presumed valid independently of the validity of other claims. This means that even if one claim is found invalid, the other claims remain valid unless separately challenged.

Defenses Against Infringement

Defenses against infringement might include arguments that the accused product or process does not fall within the scope of the claims, or that the patent is invalid due to prior art or other reasons.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Understanding the broader patent landscape is essential for assessing the significance and potential impact of US 6,537,983.

Prior Art Search

Conducting a prior art search using tools like the USPTO's Patent Public Search or international databases such as the European Patent Office's esp@cenet can help identify similar patents and determine the novelty of the invention[1].

Patent Family Analysis

Using tools like the Global Dossier, one can analyze the patent family for a specific application, including related applications filed at participating IP Offices. This helps in understanding the global reach and related intellectual property[1].

Citation Analysis

The Common Citation Document (CCD) application can provide a single point of access to citation data, helping to visualize the prior art cited by multiple offices for the same invention[1].

Practical Steps for Analyzing a Patent

Step-by-Step Search Strategy

The USPTO provides a step-by-step strategy for conducting a preliminary U.S. patent search, which includes using the Patent Public Search tool and other resources like the Public Search Facility and Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs)[1].

Using Advanced Tools

Tools like the Patent Examination Data System (PEDS) and the Publication Site for Issued and Published Sequences (PSIPS) can provide detailed bibliographic data and sequence listings, respectively[1].

Industry Expert Insights

Industry experts and legal practitioners often provide valuable insights into the patent landscape.

Consultative Groups

For example, the Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) engaged a consultative group of experts to study the feasibility of a small claims patent court, highlighting the importance of diverse perspectives in patent policy[2].

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis can provide deeper insights into patent trends and scope.

Patent Claims Research Dataset

The USPTO's Patent Claims Research Dataset contains detailed information on claims from U.S. patents and applications, allowing for statistical analysis of patent scope and trends[3].

Key Takeaways

  • Claims Analysis: The claims section is crucial for understanding the scope of protection.
  • Scope of Protection: The scope is determined by the claims and is presumed valid.
  • Patent Landscape: Analyzing prior art, patent families, and citations is essential.
  • Practical Steps: Use advanced tools and follow a step-by-step search strategy.
  • Expert Insights: Consult industry experts and legal practitioners.
  • Statistical Analysis: Utilize datasets to analyze patent trends.

FAQs

What is the importance of claim construction in patent analysis?

Claim construction is critical as it determines the scope of the patent and is often a point of contention in patent litigation.

How can I conduct a prior art search for a patent?

Use tools like the USPTO's Patent Public Search, the European Patent Office's esp@cenet, and other international databases to conduct a thorough prior art search.

What is the Global Dossier and how does it help in patent analysis?

The Global Dossier provides access to the file histories of related applications from participating IP Offices, helping to analyze the patent family and global reach of an invention.

What is the Common Citation Document (CCD) and its role in patent analysis?

The CCD consolidates prior art cited by multiple offices for the same invention, providing a single point of access to citation data.

How can statistical datasets help in analyzing patent scope and trends?

Statistical datasets like the USPTO's Patent Claims Research Dataset allow for detailed analysis of patent claims and trends, providing insights into the scope and impact of patents.

Sources

  1. USPTO - Search for patents: https://www.uspto.gov/patents/search
  2. ACUS - U.S. Patent Small Claims Court: https://www.acus.gov/research-projects/us-patent-small-claims-court
  3. USPTO - Patent Claims Research Dataset: https://www.uspto.gov/ip-policy/economic-research/research-datasets/patent-claims-research-dataset
  4. United States Patent 7,531,528 B2: https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/44/36/a4/080a94efd8eb9e/US7531528.pdf
  5. 35 USC 282: Presumption of validity; defenses: https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid%3AUSC-1994-title35-section282&num=0&edition=1994

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,537,983

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 6,537,983

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom0108800Apr 07, 2001

International Family Members for US Patent 6,537,983

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 1305329 ⤷  Subscribe 91429 Luxembourg ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 1305329 ⤷  Subscribe CA 2008 00022 Denmark ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 1305329 ⤷  Subscribe 300343 Netherlands ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.