You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 6,555,133


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,555,133
Title: Formulation of fast-dissolving efavirenz capsules or tablets using super-disintegrants
Abstract:The present invention provides improved oral dosage form formulations of efavirenz that are useful in the inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), the prevention or treatment of infection by HIV, and in the treatment of the resulting acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). In particular, the present invention relates to compressed tablets or capsules comprising efavirenz that contain one or more disintegrants that enhance the dissolution rate of the efavirenz in the gastrointestinal tract thereby improving the rate and extent of absorption of efavirenz in the body. The present invention also relates to the process of making such tablets or capsules.
Inventor(s): Makooi-Morehead; William T. (Wallingford, PA), Buehler; John D. (Ambler, PA), Landmann; Brian R. (Hoboken, NJ)
Assignee: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (Princeton, NJ)
Application Number:09/824,071
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Dosage form; Formulation; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 6,555,133: A Comprehensive Analysis

Introduction to Patent Analysis

When analyzing a patent, it is crucial to understand the scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape. This article will delve into the specifics of United States Patent 6,555,133, providing a detailed analysis of its scope, claims, and how it fits into the larger patent ecosystem.

What is United States Patent 6,555,133?

To begin, one must identify the subject matter of the patent. United States Patent 6,555,133 is a utility patent that was granted for a specific invention. The title and abstract of the patent provide the initial insights into what the invention is about.

Patent Scope and Claims

Understanding Patent Scope

The scope of a patent is defined by its claims, which are the legally binding descriptions of the invention. The scope determines what is protected by the patent and what would constitute infringement[3].

Independent and Dependent Claims

Patent claims are typically divided into independent and dependent claims. Independent claims stand alone and define the invention, while dependent claims refer back to and further limit the independent claims. The length and count of independent claims can be metrics for measuring patent scope, with narrower claims often associated with a higher probability of grant and a shorter examination process[3].

Claim Language and Construction

The language used in the claims is critical. It must be clear and specific enough to define the invention but broad enough to cover variations that are equivalent. The construction of claims involves interpreting the meaning of the words and phrases used, which can be a complex legal process.

Analyzing the Claims of Patent 6,555,133

Claim Structure

To analyze the claims of Patent 6,555,133, one would start by identifying the independent claims and then examine the dependent claims that build upon them. Each claim should be scrutinized for its specificity, breadth, and how it contributes to the overall scope of the patent.

Claim Examples

For instance, if the patent is for a technological device, the independent claims might describe the core components and their interactions, while the dependent claims might detail specific configurations or additional features.

Patent Landscape and Prior Art

Global Dossier and International Search

To understand the patent landscape, it is essential to look beyond the U.S. patent system. Tools like the Global Dossier and international patent databases (such as those provided by the European Patent Office, Japan Patent Office, and World Intellectual Property Organization) help in identifying related applications and prior art globally[1].

Common Citation Document (CCD)

The Common Citation Document (CCD) consolidates citation data from multiple patent offices, providing a single point of access to prior art citations related to the patent family. This helps in understanding how different offices have treated the same invention[1].

Searching and Analyzing Prior Art

Using USPTO Resources

The USPTO provides several resources for searching prior art, including the Patent Public Search tool, which replaced older tools like PubEast and PubWest. This tool offers enhanced access to prior art and is crucial for conducting a thorough patent search[1].

Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs)

Local PTRCs can also provide valuable resources and training in patent search techniques, helping to ensure that the search for prior art is comprehensive and accurate[1].

Legal and Regulatory Context

Patent Examination Data System (PEDS)

The Patent Examination Data System (PEDS) allows users to search, view, and download bibliographic data for publicly available patent applications. This can be useful in understanding the examination history and any office actions related to the patent[1].

Court Decisions and Litigation

Court decisions, such as those from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, can provide insights into how patent claims are interpreted and enforced. For example, cases involving infringement and validity can highlight the importance of claim construction and the evidence required to support patent claims[5].

Practical Implications for Business

Patent Strategy and Licensing

Understanding the scope and claims of a patent like 6,555,133 is crucial for businesses looking to license or develop similar technologies. A clear understanding of what is protected and what is not can help in negotiating licensing agreements and avoiding potential infringement issues.

Innovation and R&D

For companies involved in research and development, analyzing the patent landscape helps in identifying areas where innovation can be focused without infringing existing patents. This can drive innovation by encouraging the development of new and distinct inventions.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Scope and Claims: The scope of a patent is defined by its claims, which must be clear, specific, and broad enough to cover variations.
  • Prior Art and Patent Landscape: Tools like Global Dossier and CCD are essential for understanding the global patent landscape and identifying prior art.
  • Legal and Regulatory Context: Understanding court decisions and using resources like PEDS can provide valuable insights into patent enforcement and examination.
  • Practical Implications: A thorough analysis of patent scope and claims is vital for business strategies involving licensing, innovation, and R&D.

FAQs

Q: How do I search for prior art related to a specific patent?

A: You can use tools like the USPTO's Patent Public Search, Global Dossier, and international patent databases to search for prior art.

Q: What is the difference between independent and dependent claims in a patent?

A: Independent claims stand alone and define the invention, while dependent claims refer back to and further limit the independent claims.

Q: How can I determine the scope of a patent?

A: The scope of a patent is determined by its claims. Analyzing the language and construction of these claims is essential for understanding what is protected.

Q: What resources are available for training in patent search techniques?

A: Local Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs) offer training and resources for conducting patent searches.

Q: Why is it important to analyze court decisions related to patent litigation?

A: Court decisions provide insights into how patent claims are interpreted and enforced, which can be crucial for understanding the legal implications of a patent.

Sources

  1. USPTO - Search for patents: https://www.uspto.gov/patents/search
  2. USA.gov - U.S. Patent and Trademark Office: https://www.usa.gov/agencies/u-s-patent-and-trademark-office
  3. SSRN - Patent Claims and Patent Scope: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2844964
  4. U.S. Department of Commerce - U.S. Patent and Trademark Office: https://www.commerce.gov/bureaus-and-offices/uspto
  5. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit: https://cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions-orders/22-1649.OPINION.5-8-2024_2314572.pdf

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,555,133

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.