You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 6,716,830


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,716,830
Title: Ophthalmic antibiotic compositions containing moxifloxacin
Abstract:Ophthalmic, otic and nasal compositions containing a new class of antibiotics (e.g., moxifloxacin) are disclosed. The compositions preferably also contain one or more anti-inflammatory agents. The compositions may be utilized to treat ophthalmic, otic and nasal conditions by topically applying the compositions to the affected tissues.
Inventor(s): Cagle; Gerald (Fort Worth, TX), Abshire; Robert L. (Fort Worth, TX), Stroman; David W. (Irving, TX), Yanni; John M. (Burleson, TX)
Assignee: Alcon, Inc. (Hunenberg, CH)
Application Number:10/200,868
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 6,716,830
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

United States Patent 6,716,830: A Detailed Analysis of Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

The United States Patent 6,716,830, titled "Ophthalmic Antibiotic Compositions Containing Moxifloxacin," is a significant patent in the field of ophthalmic pharmaceuticals. This patent, owned by Alcon, Inc., protects the formulation and use of moxifloxacin hydrochloride in ophthalmic solutions. Here, we delve into the scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape surrounding this invention.

Background and Invention

The patent was granted for compositions specifically formulated for topical application to ophthalmic, otic, and nasal tissues. The primary active ingredient is moxifloxacin, a known antibiotic compound effective against a wide range of bacteria, including both gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens[4].

Need for the Invention

In the late 1990s, there was a pressing need for efficacious treatments for intraocular infections caused by bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Alcon's research focused on developing a compound that could treat these infections and also serve as a prophylactic measure to prevent infection during surgery[1].

Scope of the Patent

Protected Compositions

The '830 patent protects ophthalmic antibiotic compositions containing moxifloxacin hydrochloride. These compositions are designed to be stable, preserved, and suitable for multi-dose administration. Key components include:

  • Active Ingredient: Moxifloxacin hydrochloride.
  • Anti-inflammatory Agents: Optionally includes steroidal and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, with preferred steroidal agents such as dexamethasone, loteprednol, and others[4].
  • Preservatives and Additives: Includes ingredients like edetate disodium, ionic tonicity adjusting agents (e.g., sodium chloride), non-ionic surfactants (e.g., tyloxapol), and preservatives (e.g., benzalkonium chloride and sorbitol)[4].

Specific Formulations

The patent details specific formulations, including:

  • Solution Compositions: Aqueous solutions with a pH adjusted to be ophthalmically acceptable.
  • Suspension Compositions: Examples include a suspension containing moxifloxacin and dexamethasone (micronized) with a pH of 5.5[4].

Claims of the Patent

Claim 1

The primary claim of the '830 patent involves the composition of moxifloxacin hydrochloride for ophthalmic use. Specifically, it claims:

  • A topical ophthalmic solution containing moxifloxacin hydrochloride as the active ingredient.
  • The solution is formulated to be stable and preserved for multi-dose use[1][5].

Other Claims

Additional claims cover various aspects of the composition, including:

  • The presence of anti-inflammatory agents.
  • The use of specific preservatives and additives.
  • The formulation's osmolality and pH adjustments[4].

Patent Litigation and Enforcement

Alcon, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.

A significant litigation case involving the '830 patent was between Alcon, Inc., and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. Teva filed an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) to market a generic version of Alcon's VIGAMOX® (moxifloxacin hydrochloride ophthalmic solution). Alcon sued Teva for patent infringement, and the court ultimately ruled that Teva's ANDA product infringed claim 1 of the '830 patent[1].

Patent Landscape

Patent Scope and Quality

The debate over patent quality and scope is relevant here. The '830 patent's claims are specific and well-defined, which contrasts with the criticism of some patents being overly broad or unclear. Metrics such as independent claim length and count can measure patent scope, and narrower claims, like those in the '830 patent, are often associated with a higher probability of grant and shorter examination processes[3].

Related Patents and Applications

Other patents and applications in the field of ophthalmic and otic solutions often reference the '830 patent. For example, patents involving moxifloxacin and dexamethasone combinations for topical administration to the eye or ear frequently cite this patent[4].

Industry Impact

Commercial Success

The commercial success of VIGAMOX®, protected by the '830 patent, is evident from its significant sales figures. The product has resulted in hundreds of millions of dollars in sales, highlighting the market demand and the patent's economic impact[1].

Innovation and Competition

The '830 patent has influenced innovation in ophthalmic pharmaceuticals by setting a standard for antibiotic compositions. It has also shaped competition, as generic manufacturers like Teva must navigate the patent landscape to bring similar products to market[1].

Key Takeaways

  • Specific Claims: The '830 patent protects specific compositions of moxifloxacin hydrochloride for ophthalmic use.
  • Litigation: Successful enforcement against generic manufacturers like Teva underscores the patent's validity and scope.
  • Industry Impact: The patent has driven innovation and commercial success in ophthalmic pharmaceuticals.
  • Patent Landscape: The patent's well-defined claims align with best practices in patent scope and quality.

FAQs

What is the primary active ingredient protected by the '830 patent?

The primary active ingredient is moxifloxacin hydrochloride.

What is the main application of the compositions protected by the '830 patent?

The compositions are designed for topical application to ophthalmic, otic, and nasal tissues.

Which company owns the '830 patent?

The '830 patent is owned by Alcon, Inc.

What was the outcome of the litigation between Alcon and Teva regarding the '830 patent?

The court ruled that Teva's ANDA product infringed claim 1 of the '830 patent.

How has the '830 patent impacted the ophthalmic pharmaceutical industry?

The patent has driven innovation, set standards for antibiotic compositions, and contributed to the commercial success of VIGAMOX®.

Sources

  1. Alcon, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. - United States District Court, D. Delaware, Oct 19, 2009.
  2. U.S. Patent Number 6,716,830 : Cases - Law360.
  3. Patent Claims and Patent Scope - Hoover Institution.
  4. WO2009070530A1 - Topical ophthalmic or otic solution formulations - Google Patents.
  5. Alcon-v-imprimis.pdf - Patent Docs.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,716,830

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.