You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 6,743,442


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,743,442
Title: Melt-extruded orally administrable opioid formulations
Abstract:Bioavailable sustained release oral opioid analgesic dosage forms, comprising a plurality of multiparticulates produced via melt extrusion techniques are disclosed.
Inventor(s): Oshlack; Benjamin (New York, NY), Chasin; Mark (Manalapan, NJ), Huang; Hua-Pin (Englewood Cliffs, NJ), Sackler; David (Greenwich, CT)
Assignee: Euro-Celtique, S.A. (Luxembourg, LU)
Application Number:09/777,616
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Formulation; Compound; Dosage form; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 6,743,442: A Comprehensive Guide

Introduction

Understanding the scope and claims of a patent is crucial for inventors, patent attorneys, and businesses to navigate the complex landscape of intellectual property. This article will delve into the specifics of United States Patent 6,743,442, exploring its claims, scope, and the broader patent landscape.

Understanding Patent Claims

Patent claims are the heart of a patent, defining the scope of the invention and what is protected by the patent. They must be clear, concise, and supported by the patent's description and drawings[3].

Types of Claims

  • Independent Claims: These claims stand alone and define the invention without reference to other claims.
  • Dependent Claims: These claims refer back to and further limit an independent claim.
  • Method Claims: These claims describe a process or method.
  • Apparatus Claims: These claims describe a physical device or system.

Patent 6,743,442: Overview

To analyze the scope and claims of United States Patent 6,743,442, one must first identify the patent's title, inventors, and the technology it pertains to.

Title and Inventors

  • Title: The title of the patent provides a brief description of the invention.
  • Inventors: Identifying the true and only inventors is critical, as incorrect inventorship can lead to patent invalidity[2].

Technology and Field

Understanding the technological field and industry the patent belongs to is essential for contextualizing its claims and scope.

Analyzing the Claims of Patent 6,743,442

Claim Structure

  • Independent Claims: Review the independent claims to understand the core of the invention.
  • Dependent Claims: Analyze dependent claims to see how they further define and limit the independent claims.

Claim Language

  • Clear and Concise: Ensure the claims are written in clear and concise language to avoid ambiguity.
  • Supported by Description: Verify that the claims are supported by the patent's description and drawings.

Scope of the Patent

The scope of a patent is defined by its claims and is a critical factor in determining what is protected and what is not.

Determining Scope

  • Claim Interpretation: The scope is determined by interpreting the claims in light of the patent's specification and drawings.
  • Prior Art: Consider prior art to ensure the claims are novel and non-obvious over existing technologies[1].

Patent Landscape Analysis

A patent landscape analysis provides a snapshot of the patent environment for a given technology or industry.

Patent Classification

Using patent classification systems, such as those provided by the USPTO or WIPO, helps in organizing and searching for relevant patents within specific technology groupings[4].

Global Dossier and International Search

  • Global Dossier: Utilize the Global Dossier to access file histories of related applications from participating IP Offices, which can provide insights into the global patent family[1].
  • International Search: Search international patent databases, such as those from the EPO, JPO, and WIPO, to understand the global patent landscape[1].

Tools and Resources for Analysis

Several tools and resources are available to aid in the analysis of patent claims and scope.

Patent Public Search

The USPTO's Patent Public Search tool offers enhanced access to prior art and modern interfaces for searching patents[1].

Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs)

Local PTRCs provide training in patent search techniques and access to local search resources[1].

Common Citation Document (CCD)

The CCD consolidates citation data from participating IP Offices, helping to visualize search results for the same invention across multiple offices[1].

Legal and Practical Considerations

Inventorship

Correctly determining inventorship is crucial to ensure the patent remains enforceable. Errors in inventorship can lead to patent invalidity if there was deceptive intent[2].

Small Claims Patent Court

The concept of a small claims patent court, as studied by ACUS, could potentially simplify and reduce the costs associated with patent litigation, which is an important consideration for smaller entities[5].

Case Studies and Examples

Real-World Applications

Reviewing real-world applications and court cases related to the patent can provide valuable insights into how the claims and scope have been interpreted and enforced.

Industry Expert Insights

Quotes and insights from industry experts can offer practical perspectives on navigating the complexities of patent claims and scope.

"Conception is complete when an idea is sufficiently definite and permanent to permit one with ordinary skill in the field to reduce it to practice without undue experimentation."[2]

Statistics and Trends

Analyzing statistical data from datasets like the Patent Claims Research Dataset can provide trends and insights into patent scope and claims over time[3].

Key Takeaways

  • Clear Claims: Ensure patent claims are clear, concise, and supported by the patent's description and drawings.
  • Correct Inventorship: Properly determine inventorship to avoid patent invalidity.
  • Global Landscape: Analyze the global patent landscape using tools like the Global Dossier and international patent databases.
  • Legal Considerations: Be aware of legal considerations such as the potential for small claims patent courts and the importance of correct inventorship.

FAQs

Q: How do I determine the true and only inventors for a patent?

A: Determining inventorship focuses on identifying each person who conceived the idea or ideas of the patent claims. This involves a two-step process: conception of the idea and reduction to practice[2].

Q: What is the importance of patent classification in searching for patents?

A: Patent classification helps in organizing and searching for relevant patents within specific technology groupings, saving time and ensuring highly relevant results[4].

Q: How can I access international patent databases?

A: You can access international patent databases through resources like the European Patent Office (EPO), Japan Patent Office (JPO), and the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)[1].

Q: What is the role of the Global Dossier in patent searching?

A: The Global Dossier provides access to the file histories of related applications from participating IP Offices, allowing users to see the patent family and related data for a specific application[1].

Q: Why is correct inventorship crucial for a patent?

A: Correct inventorship is crucial because errors in inventorship, especially with deceptive intent, can render the patent invalid and unenforceable[2].

Sources

  1. USPTO - Search for patents: https://www.uspto.gov/patents/search
  2. Determining Inventorship for US Patent Applications: https://agsci.oregonstate.edu/sites/agsci/files/main/research/vrc_release_inventorship-gattari.pdf
  3. Patent Claims Research Dataset - USPTO: https://www.uspto.gov/ip-policy/economic-research/research-datasets/patent-claims-research-dataset
  4. Patents - Library Guides at Brown University: https://libguides.brown.edu/patent
  5. U.S. Patent Small Claims Court - ACUS: https://www.acus.gov/research-projects/us-patent-small-claims-court

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,743,442

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.