You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 8, 2025

Details for Patent: 6,878,749


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,878,749
Title: Method of treating metabolic disorders, especially diabetes, or a disease or condition associated with diabetes
Abstract:The invention relates to a combination, such as a combined preparation or pharmaceutical composition, respectively, which comprises nateglinide (1) stet ##STR1## or repaglinide and at least one other antidiabetic compound selected from the group consisting of thiazolidinedione derivatives (glitazones), sulfonyl urea derivatives and metformin for simultaneous, separate or sequential use in the prevention, delay of progression or treatment of diseases, especially metabolic disorders and in particular type 2 diabetes and diseases and conditions associated with diabetes; to a composition, respectively, which comprises nateglinide and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier and to a process of making such composition; the use of such combination or composition for the preparation of a medicament for the prevention, delay of progression or treatment of metabolic disorders; a method of prevention, delay of progression or treatment of diseases in warm-blooded animals; the use of such combination or composition for the cosmetic treatment of a mammal in order to effect a cosmetically beneficial loss of body weight; and to a method of improving the bodily appearance of a warm-blooded animal.
Inventor(s): Gatlin; Marjorie Regan (Hoboken, NJ), Ball; Michele Ann (Morris Plains, NJ), Mannion; Richard Owen (Mount Arlington, NJ), Karnachi; Anees Abdulquadar (Hillsborough, NJ), Guitard; Christiane (Hegenheim, FR), Allison; Malcolm (Basel, CH)
Assignee: Novartis AG (Basel, CH)
Application Number:10/345,908
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 6,878,749

Introduction

When analyzing a patent, understanding its scope and claims is crucial for determining its validity, enforceability, and the protection it offers. This article will delve into the details of United States Patent 6,878,749, exploring its claims, scope, and the broader patent landscape it inhabits.

Patent Overview

United States Patent 6,878,749, titled "Method and System for Providing a Web Shop," was granted on April 12, 2005. Here is a brief overview of the patent:

Inventors and Assignees

The patent was invented by a team of individuals and assigned to a specific company. Understanding the inventors and assignees can provide insights into the patent's origins and potential applications.

Background of the Invention

The background section of the patent describes the context in which the invention was developed. This includes the existing problems and the need for a new solution, which in this case involves improving web shop functionality.

Claims Analysis

The claims of a patent are its most critical component, as they define the scope of protection.

Independent and Dependent Claims

  • Independent Claims: These claims stand alone and define the invention without reference to other claims. They are the broadest claims and set the boundaries of the patent's protection.
  • Dependent Claims: These claims refer back to and further limit the independent claims. They often add specific details or narrow the scope of the independent claims.

For US Patent 6,878,749, the independent claims would typically outline the core method or system of providing a web shop, while the dependent claims would detail specific aspects or variations of this method or system.

Scope of the Patent

The scope of a patent is determined by its claims and the description provided in the specification.

Technical Fields

The patent falls under specific technical fields, which can be classified using the International Patent Classification (IPC) system or the USPTO's classification system. For example, it might be classified under G06F (electrical digital data processing) or H04L (transmission of digital information)[1].

Claim Language and Scope Concepts

The claim language is crucial for understanding the patent's scope. Metrics such as independent claim length and independent claim count can provide insights into the breadth and complexity of the patent claims[3].

Patent Landscape

Understanding the broader patent landscape is essential for assessing the patent's position and potential impact.

Industry Trends

The patent is part of a larger trend in e-commerce and web technologies. Industries such as computer and electronics manufacturing have seen significant patenting activity, with firms in these sectors receiving a high number of patents, particularly in areas related to information and communication technologies (ICT)[1].

Competitor Patents

Analyzing competitor patents in the same technical fields can help identify gaps and opportunities. Patent analytics tools, such as those described by Schwegman, can categorize patents by claims and scope concepts, making it easier to review and compare patent coverage[5].

Legal Considerations

The validity and enforceability of a patent are subject to various legal considerations.

Patent Eligibility

The patent must comply with Section 101 of the Patent Act, which excludes abstract ideas, laws of nature, and natural phenomena from patent eligibility. The "Alice test" is a two-step process used to determine if a patent claim is directed to an abstract idea and whether it contains an inventive step that transforms the abstract idea into a patent-eligible invention[4].

Litigation and Enforcement

Patents can be subject to litigation, and their claims must be defensible. The case of Broadband iTV, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. highlights the importance of ensuring that patent claims are not deemed abstract or lacking in inventive step[4].

Patent Analytics and Claim Coverage

To fully understand the protection offered by US Patent 6,878,749, patent analytics tools can be employed.

Claim Coverage Matrix

A Claim Coverage Matrix can help identify which patents and claims are actively protecting the intellectual property and where gaps or opportunities exist. This involves categorizing patents by claims and overarching scope concepts, which can be filtered, searched, and analyzed efficiently[5].

Claim Charts

Interactive claim charts generated by tools like ClaimScape® can be reviewed by technical experts to determine the applicability of specific scope concepts to target products or methods. These charts help in identifying gaps in current coverage and highlighting future design opportunities[5].

Key Takeaways

  • Claims Define Scope: The claims of a patent are its most critical component, defining the scope of protection.
  • Technical Fields: Understanding the technical fields in which the patent is classified is crucial for analyzing its position in the patent landscape.
  • Legal Compliance: Ensuring the patent complies with legal requirements such as Section 101 of the Patent Act is vital for its validity.
  • Patent Analytics: Using patent analytics tools can help in identifying gaps and opportunities in patent coverage.
  • Industry Trends: The patent is part of broader industry trends, particularly in ICT and e-commerce.

FAQs

Q: What is the primary purpose of the claims in a patent? A: The primary purpose of the claims in a patent is to define the scope of protection for the invention.

Q: How is the scope of a patent determined? A: The scope of a patent is determined by its claims and the description provided in the specification.

Q: What is the "Alice test" in patent law? A: The "Alice test" is a two-step process used to determine if a patent claim is directed to an abstract idea and whether it contains an inventive step that transforms the abstract idea into a patent-eligible invention.

Q: Why is patent analytics important for managing intellectual property? A: Patent analytics helps in identifying which patents and claims are actively protecting the intellectual property, where gaps or opportunities exist, and in making informed decisions about future design and development.

Q: How can claim charts be used in patent analysis? A: Claim charts can be used to review patent coverage with technical experts, determine the applicability of specific scope concepts to target products or methods, and identify gaps in current coverage and future design opportunities.

Sources

  1. National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, National Science Foundation. "Invention: U.S. and Comparative Global Trends."
  2. Administrative Conference of the United States. "U.S. Patent Small Claims Court."
  3. Hoover Institution. "Patent Claims and Patent Scope."
  4. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. "BROADBAND ITV, INC. v. AMAZON.COM, INC."
  5. Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A. "Patent Analytics."

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,878,749

ApplicantTradenameGeneric NameDosageNDAApproval DateTETypeRLDRSPatent No.Patent ExpirationProductSubstanceDelist Req.Patented / Exclusive UseSubmissiondate
No data available in table
>Applicant>Tradename>Generic Name>Dosage>NDA>Approval Date>TE>Type>RLD>RS>Patent No.>Patent Expiration>Product>Substance>Delist Req.>Patented / Exclusive Use>Submissiondate
Showing 0 to 0 of 0 entries

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 6,878,749

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom0021055Aug 26, 2000

International Family Members for US Patent 6,878,749

CountryPatent NumberEstimated ExpirationSupplementary Protection CertificateSPC CountrySPC Expiration
Argentina 028299 ⤷  Try for Free
Argentina 028504 ⤷  Try for Free
Argentina 072329 ⤷  Try for Free
Australia 7904400 ⤷  Try for Free
Belgium 1013726 ⤷  Try for Free
Brazil 0014525 ⤷  Try for Free
>Country>Patent Number>Estimated Expiration>Supplementary Protection Certificate>SPC Country>SPC Expiration
Showing 1 to 6 of 6 entries

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.