You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 6,933,310


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,933,310
Title: Therapeutic agent for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)
Abstract:An object of the present invention is to provide a novel medicament with which motor neuron diseases can be treated. According to the present invention, there is provided a therapeutic agent for motor neuron diseases which comprises 3-methyl-1-phenyl-2-pirazoline-5-on or physiologically acceptable salts thereof as an active ingredient.
Inventor(s): Ikeda; Ken (Tokyo, JP)
Assignee: Mitsubishi Pharma Corporation (Osaka, JP)
Application Number:10/399,961
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

United States Patent 6,933,310: A Detailed Analysis of Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

United States Patent 6,933,310, hereafter referred to as the '310 patent, is a significant intellectual property asset in the pharmaceutical sector. This patent pertains to a novel medicament designed for the treatment of motor neuron diseases. Here, we will delve into the scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape surrounding this invention.

Background and Objectives

The '310 patent aims to provide a new therapeutic approach for motor neuron diseases, which are a group of neurological disorders that selectively affect motor neurons, the cells that control voluntary muscle activity. The primary objective of this patent is to introduce a medicament that can effectively treat these conditions.

Scope of the Patent

Claim Structure

The scope of the '310 patent is defined by its claims, which are the legal boundaries of the invention. The claims typically include independent and dependent claims. Independent claims stand alone and define the invention broadly, while dependent claims narrow down the invention by adding specific features to the independent claims[3].

Claim Language and Metrics

The scope can also be analyzed using metrics such as independent claim length and independent claim count. These metrics are indicative of the patent's breadth and clarity. Generally, narrower claims with shorter lengths and fewer counts are associated with a higher probability of grant and a shorter examination process[3].

Key Claims and Descriptions

Independent Claims

The independent claims of the '310 patent outline the core components of the medicament. These claims typically describe the active ingredients, their chemical structures, and the methods of administration.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims further specify the invention by detailing particular aspects such as dosage forms, administration routes, and specific therapeutic applications.

Patent Landscape

Classification and Categorization

The '310 patent is classified under various categories within the International Patent Classification (IPC) system. For pharmaceutical inventions, common classifications include A61K (Preparations for medical, dental, or toilet purposes) and specific subclasses like A61K31 (Medicinal preparations containing organic active ingredients)[4].

Competitive Landscape

The patent landscape for motor neuron disease treatments is competitive, with multiple players and patents. The '310 patent must be distinguished from other related patents to ensure its validity and enforceability. This involves analyzing prior art, existing patents, and ongoing research in the field.

Prior Art and Validity

Prior Art Analysis

To ensure the validity of the '310 patent, it is crucial to analyze prior art. This involves identifying earlier patents, publications, and other disclosures that may anticipate or render the claimed invention obvious. The patent office and courts often rely on prior art to determine the novelty and non-obviousness of the invention[2].

Litigation and IPRs

Patents can be challenged through Inter Partes Reviews (IPRs) or other litigation processes. The validity of the '310 patent could be tested if other parties assert that it is unpatentable over prior art or for other reasons. The decision in cases like Medtronic, Inc. v. Teleflex Life Sciences Limited highlights the importance of demonstrating conception, reduction to practice, and diligence in the development of the invention[2].

Examination Process and Patent Maintenance

Examination Process

The examination process for the '310 patent would have involved a thorough review by the patent office to ensure that the claims meet the criteria of novelty, non-obviousness, and utility. The process tends to narrow the scope of patent claims, making them more specific and less broad[3].

Patent Maintenance

After grant, the '310 patent requires maintenance payments to remain in force. The cost and frequency of these payments can be significant, and the decision to maintain the patent depends on its commercial value and strategic importance.

Commercial and Therapeutic Impact

Market Potential

The '310 patent has significant market potential given the need for effective treatments for motor neuron diseases. The commercial success of the medicament depends on factors such as regulatory approvals, clinical efficacy, and market competition.

Therapeutic Benefits

The therapeutic benefits of the medicament outlined in the '310 patent are crucial for patients suffering from motor neuron diseases. Effective treatment options can improve quality of life and extend life expectancy, making this patent a valuable asset in the healthcare sector.

Regulatory Considerations

FDA Approvals

For the medicament to be marketed, it must receive regulatory approvals, such as those from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The regulatory process involves clinical trials and safety evaluations to ensure the drug's efficacy and safety.

Compliance with Guidelines

The patent holder must comply with regulatory guidelines and standards to ensure that the medicament is manufactured, labeled, and distributed in accordance with legal requirements.

Conclusion

The United States Patent 6,933,310 is a critical intellectual property asset in the treatment of motor neuron diseases. Understanding its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape is essential for navigating the complex world of pharmaceutical patents.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope and Claims: The patent's scope is defined by its claims, which must be novel, non-obvious, and useful.
  • Patent Landscape: The competitive landscape includes other patents and prior art that must be distinguished from the '310 patent.
  • Examination and Maintenance: The patent underwent a rigorous examination process and requires ongoing maintenance payments.
  • Commercial and Therapeutic Impact: The patent has significant market potential and therapeutic benefits.
  • Regulatory Considerations: Regulatory approvals and compliance with guidelines are crucial for the medicament's commercialization.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What is the primary objective of the '310 patent?

The primary objective of the '310 patent is to provide a novel medicament for the treatment of motor neuron diseases.

2. How is the scope of the patent defined?

The scope of the patent is defined by its claims, which include independent and dependent claims that outline the core components and specific features of the medicament.

3. What are the key metrics for analyzing patent scope?

Key metrics include independent claim length and independent claim count, which are indicative of the patent's breadth and clarity.

4. What regulatory approvals are required for the medicament?

The medicament must receive regulatory approvals, such as those from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which involve clinical trials and safety evaluations.

5. How does the patent landscape impact the '310 patent?

The patent landscape, including prior art and other related patents, must be carefully analyzed to ensure the validity and enforceability of the '310 patent.

Cited Sources:

  1. Patent Analysis of the Critical Technology Network of Semiconductor Optical Amplifiers Technologies - MDPI.
  2. MEDTRONIC, INC. v. TELEFLEX LIFE SCIENCES LIMITED - CAFC.
  3. Patent Claims and Patent Scope - SSRN.
  4. WO2019213335A1 - Orally bioavailable prodrugs of edaravone with enhanced oral bioavailability - Google Patents.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,933,310

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 6,933,310

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Japan2000-324476Oct 24, 2000
PCT Information
PCT FiledNovember 13, 2000PCT Application Number:PCT/JP00/07994
PCT Publication Date:May 02, 2002PCT Publication Number: WO02/34264

International Family Members for US Patent 6,933,310

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 303808 ⤷  Subscribe
Germany 60022560 ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 1405637 ⤷  Subscribe
Spain 2248144 ⤷  Subscribe
Japan 3758164 ⤷  Subscribe
Japan WO2002034264 ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.