You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 6,983,743


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,983,743
Title:Stainless steel canister for propellant-driven metering aerosols
Abstract:The present invention relates to corrosion resistant stainless steel canisters for propellant-containing aerosol formulations for use in propellant gas-operated inhalers.
Inventor(s): Hoelz; Hubert (Oberheimbach, DE), Lostritto; Richard Thomas (Gaithersburg, MD), Nagel; Juergen (Bad Kreuznach, DE), Vega; Julio Ce (Capital Federal Buenos Aires, AR)
Assignee: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma KG (Ingelheim, DE)
Application Number:10/849,725
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Delivery; Device; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of a U.S. Patent: A Detailed Analysis of United States Patent 6,983,743

Introduction

When navigating the complex world of patents, understanding the scope and claims of a patent is crucial for inventors, patent holders, and legal professionals. This article will delve into the specifics of United States Patent 6,983,743, using it as a case study to explain the key concepts and processes involved in patent claims and scope determination.

What is a Patent?

A patent is a government grant that gives the inventor exclusive rights to make, use, and sell an invention for a specified period, typically 20 years from the date of filing[2].

Determining Inventorship

Before diving into the scope and claims, it is essential to understand who qualifies as an inventor. In U.S. patent law, an inventor is someone who conceives the subject matter of at least one claim of the patent. Conception is defined as the formation in the mind of the inventor of a definite and permanent idea of the complete and operative invention[1].

The Two-Step Process of Invention

Invention involves two steps: conception and reduction to practice. Conception is the formation of the idea, while reduction to practice involves making a working example of the claimed invention. Determining inventorship focuses almost exclusively on the conception step[1].

Understanding Patent Claims

Patent claims are the heart of a patent application, defining the scope of the invention. They must be clear, concise, and supported by the description in the patent specification. The claims determine what is protected by the patent and what would infringe upon it[1].

Types of Claims

  • Independent Claims: These claims stand alone and do not depend on other claims.
  • Dependent Claims: These claims refer back to and further limit another claim or claims in the application.
  • Method Claims: These claims describe a process or method.
  • Apparatus Claims: These claims describe a physical device or system.

Analyzing the Scope of a Patent

The scope of a patent is defined by its claims. Here are the steps to analyze the scope:

Identify the Claims

The first step is to identify and read the claims carefully. Each claim must be analyzed to understand what is being claimed.

Determine the Meaning of the Claims

The meaning of each claim must be determined based on the specification and any relevant prior art. This involves understanding the terminology used and the context in which the claims are made[1].

Evaluate the Prior Art

Prior art refers to any existing knowledge or inventions that predate the patent application. Evaluating prior art helps in understanding whether the claims are novel and non-obvious[4].

Case Study: United States Patent 6,983,743

To illustrate these concepts, let's consider United States Patent 6,983,743, though the specific details of this patent are not provided here. Here’s a general approach to analyzing such a patent:

Step 1: Identify the Inventors

Ensure that the listed inventors are the true and only inventors who conceived the subject matter of the patent claims. This is crucial for the patent's validity and enforceability[1].

Step 2: Read and Analyze the Claims

Carefully read each claim to understand what is being protected. Identify independent and dependent claims, and determine how they relate to each other.

Step 3: Understand the Specification

The specification provides the detailed description of the invention. It must support the claims and provide enough information for someone with ordinary skill in the field to make and use the invention[1].

Step 4: Evaluate Prior Art

Research prior art to ensure the claims are novel and non-obvious. This can involve searching existing patents, publications, and other relevant sources[4].

Tools and Resources for Patent Analysis

Several tools and resources are available to help in patent analysis:

USPTO Databases

The USPTO provides extensive databases and tools for searching patents, including the Patent Claims Research Dataset, which contains detailed information on claims from U.S. patents and applications[3].

Global Dossier

The Global Dossier service allows users to access file histories of related applications from participating IP offices, providing a comprehensive view of the patent family and related data[4].

Public Search Facilities

The USPTO Public Search Facility and local Patent and Trademark Resource Centers offer assistance and access to patent and trademark information[4].

Legal Considerations and Challenges

Correcting Inventorship Errors

Errors in inventorship can be corrected, but deceptive intent can render a patent unenforceable. Ensuring the correct identification of inventors is critical to maintaining the patent's validity[1].

Small Claims Patent Court

There have been discussions and studies on establishing a small claims patent court to handle disputes more efficiently, especially for smaller entities. This could potentially simplify the process of resolving patent disputes[5].

Key Takeaways

  • Inventorship: Focuses on the conception step, requiring identification of individuals who conceived the idea.
  • Claims Analysis: Involves identifying, interpreting, and evaluating the claims against the specification and prior art.
  • Scope Determination: Defined by the claims, which must be clear, concise, and supported by the specification.
  • Tools and Resources: Utilize USPTO databases, Global Dossier, and public search facilities for comprehensive analysis.
  • Legal Considerations: Ensure correct inventorship and be aware of potential legal challenges and solutions like small claims patent courts.

FAQs

Q: Who qualifies as an inventor in a U.S. patent application?

A: An inventor is someone who conceives the subject matter of at least one claim of the patent. This involves the formation of a definite and permanent idea of the complete and operative invention[1].

Q: What is the difference between independent and dependent claims?

A: Independent claims stand alone and do not depend on other claims, while dependent claims refer back to and further limit another claim or claims in the application[1].

Q: How do I determine the scope of a patent?

A: The scope of a patent is determined by its claims. Analyze each claim, determine its meaning based on the specification and prior art, and evaluate how the claims relate to each other[1].

Q: What are the consequences of incorrect inventorship in a patent application?

A: Incorrect inventorship, especially with deceptive intent, can render a patent unenforceable. Errors can be corrected, but fraud in naming inventors invalidates the patent[1].

Q: Where can I find resources to help in patent analysis?

A: The USPTO provides various resources, including databases like the Patent Claims Research Dataset, the Global Dossier service, and public search facilities[3][4].

Sources

  1. Determining Inventorship for US Patent Applications - Oregon State University
  2. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) - USA.gov
  3. Patent Claims Research Dataset - USPTO
  4. Search for patents - USPTO
  5. U.S. Patent Small Claims Court - Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS)

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,983,743

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 6,983,743

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Argentina 024113 ⤷  Subscribe
Austria 289276 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 5809200 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 772768 ⤷  Subscribe
Bulgaria 106108 ⤷  Subscribe
Bulgaria 64861 ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.