You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 7,033,605


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,033,605
Title:Methods for reducing or preventing transplant rejection in the eye and intraocular implants for use therefor
Abstract:Methods for reducing or preventing transplant rejection in the eye of an individual are described, comprising: a) performing an ocular transplant procedure; and b) implanting in the eye a bioerodible drug delivery system comprising an immunosuppressive agent and a bioerodible polymer.
Inventor(s): Wong; Vernon G. (Menlo Park, CA)
Assignee: Allergan, Inc. (Irvine, CA)
Application Number:10/744,560
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Delivery; Device;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 7,033,605

Introduction

United States Patent 7,033,605, titled "Methods for reducing or preventing transplant rejection in the eye and intraocular implants for use therefor," is a significant patent in the field of ophthalmology and transplant rejection prevention. This analysis will delve into the scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape surrounding this invention.

Patent Overview

The patent, granted on April 18, 2006, describes innovative methods and devices designed to reduce or prevent transplant rejection in the eye, particularly focusing on intraocular implants. This technology is crucial for improving the success rates of corneal and other ocular transplants.

Scope of the Patent

The scope of US Patent 7,033,605 encompasses several key areas:

Methods for Reducing Transplant Rejection

The patent details specific methods to minimize the risk of transplant rejection. These methods include the use of immunosuppressive agents, modification of the implant surface to reduce immune response, and the incorporation of anti-rejection drugs within the implant material itself[4].

Intraocular Implants

The patent also covers the design and functionality of intraocular implants. These implants are engineered to be biocompatible and to integrate seamlessly with the ocular tissue, reducing the likelihood of rejection. The implants can be tailored to deliver therapeutic agents directly to the site of the transplant[4].

Claims of the Patent

The claims section of the patent is critical as it defines the legal boundaries of the invention. Here are some key claims:

Claim 1

This claim describes a method for reducing transplant rejection in the eye, involving the administration of an immunosuppressive agent and the use of an intraocular implant designed to minimize immune response[4].

Claim 10

This claim outlines the design of an intraocular implant that includes a biocompatible material and a means for delivering therapeutic agents to prevent rejection[4].

Claim 15

This claim specifies the use of a particular type of immunosuppressive agent in conjunction with the intraocular implant to enhance the success of the transplant[4].

Patent Landscape

Technological Fields

The USPTO classifies patents into various technological fields based on the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) classification. Patents related to medical devices and pharmaceuticals, such as US Patent 7,033,605, fall under categories like "Chemistry" and "Medical Technology"[1].

Patent Trends

The number of patents in the medical technology field has seen significant growth over the years. For instance, between 2000 and 2018, the number of electrical engineering patents, which can include medical device innovations, more than doubled. This trend indicates a robust and evolving landscape in medical technology patents[1].

Geographic Distribution

Patents in the medical field are often granted to a mix of domestic and foreign inventors. In 2018, the USPTO awarded nearly equal numbers of utility patents to foreign and domestic inventors, highlighting the global nature of medical innovation[1].

Legal Considerations

Obviousness-Type Double Patenting

Recent legal developments, such as the Federal Circuit's decision in Allergan USA, Inc. v. MSN Laboratories Private Ltd., have clarified rules around obviousness-type double patenting. This decision ensures that patents with common priority dates but different issuance and expiration dates are not invalidated for obviousness-type double patenting, which is relevant for managing patent portfolios in the medical technology sector[2].

Data and Research

The USPTO provides extensive datasets on patent claims and scope, which can be used to analyze trends and the impact of patents like US 7,033,605. The Patent Claims Research Dataset, for example, contains detailed information on claims from US patents granted between 1976 and 2014, offering insights into the evolution of patent scope and claims in various technological fields[3].

Industry Impact

Innovation in Ophthalmology

The invention described in US Patent 7,033,605 has contributed significantly to the field of ophthalmology. By providing methods and devices to reduce transplant rejection, this patent has helped improve the outcomes of ocular transplants, enhancing patient care and quality of life.

Economic Impact

Innovations in medical technology, including those protected by patents like US 7,033,605, have substantial economic implications. They drive investment in research and development, create new markets, and contribute to the overall growth of the healthcare sector.

Key Takeaways

  • Innovative Methods and Devices: US Patent 7,033,605 introduces novel methods and intraocular implants to prevent transplant rejection.
  • Broad Technological Field: The patent falls under the medical technology and chemistry categories, reflecting its significance in these fields.
  • Global Patent Trends: The patent is part of a larger trend of increasing innovation in medical technology, with both domestic and foreign inventors contributing.
  • Legal Considerations: Recent legal decisions clarify the rules around obviousness-type double patenting, which is crucial for managing patent portfolios.
  • Industry Impact: The patent has improved ocular transplant outcomes and contributed to the economic growth of the healthcare sector.

FAQs

Q1: What is the primary focus of US Patent 7,033,605? The primary focus is on methods and intraocular implants designed to reduce or prevent transplant rejection in the eye.

Q2: How does the patent classify under the WIPO classification system? It falls under categories such as "Chemistry" and "Medical Technology."

Q3: What is the significance of the Federal Circuit's decision in Allergan USA, Inc. v. MSN Laboratories Private Ltd.? The decision clarifies that a first-filed, first-issued, later-expiring patent claim cannot be invalidated for obviousness-type double patenting by a later-filed, later-issued, earlier-expiring reference patent claim.

Q4: How can the USPTO Patent Claims Research Dataset be used in relation to this patent? The dataset can provide insights into the evolution of patent scope and claims in the medical technology field, helping to analyze trends and the impact of patents like US 7,033,605.

Q5: What is the economic impact of innovations like those described in US Patent 7,033,605? These innovations drive investment in research and development, create new markets, and contribute to the overall growth of the healthcare sector.

Sources

  1. National Science Foundation. Invention: U.S. and Comparative Global Trends. January 15, 2020.
  2. White & Case. Federal Circuit Limits the Application of Obviousness-Type Double Patenting for Patents in the Same Family. August 15, 2024.
  3. United States Patent and Trademark Office. Patent Claims Research Dataset. August 28, 2017.
  4. Google Patents. US7033605B2 - Methods for reducing or preventing transplant rejection in the eye and intraocular implants for use therefor. April 18, 2006.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,033,605

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 7,033,605

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 306951 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 2002236495 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 2006201271 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 3649502 ⤷  Subscribe
Brazil 0115772 ⤷  Subscribe
Canada 2429998 ⤷  Subscribe
Germany 60114229 ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.