You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 7,153,856


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,153,856
Title:Cyclic protein tyrosine kinase inhibitors
Abstract:Novel cyclic compounds and salts thereof, pharmaceutical compositions containing such compounds, and methods of using such compounds in the treatment of protein tyrosine kinase-associated disorders such as immunologic and oncologic disorders.
Inventor(s): Barrish; Joel C. (Richboro, PA), Wityak; John (Carlsbad, CA), Das; Jagabandhu (Mercerville, NJ), Chen; Ping (Belle Mead, NJ), Norris; Derek J. (Pennington, NJ), Schieven; Gary (Lawrenceville, NJ)
Assignee: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (Princeton, NJ)
Application Number:11/138,942
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of U.S. Patents: A Detailed Analysis of Patent 7,153,856

Introduction

When navigating the complex world of patents, understanding the scope and claims of a patent is crucial for inventors, businesses, and legal professionals. This article will delve into the specifics of U.S. Patent 7,153,856, using it as a case study to explain the broader concepts of patent scope, claims, and the patent landscape in the United States.

What is a Patent?

A patent is a form of intellectual property that grants the inventor exclusive rights to make, use, or sell their invention for a specified period. In the U.S., patents are granted by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)[5].

Patent Scope and Claims

The scope of a patent is defined by its claims, which are the legal descriptions of the invention that distinguish it from prior art. The claims are a critical component because they define the boundaries of the patent's protection.

Independent and Dependent Claims

Patent claims can be independent or dependent. Independent claims stand alone and define the invention without reference to other claims. Dependent claims, on the other hand, refer back to and further limit an independent claim[3].

Metrics for Measuring Patent Scope

Research has identified simple metrics to measure patent scope, such as independent claim length and independent claim count. These metrics have explanatory power for several correlates of patent scope, including patent maintenance payments, forward citations, and the breadth of patent classes[3].

The Importance of Proper Inventorship

Determining the true and only inventors is a critical step in the patent application process. U.S. patent law requires that only those who conceived the idea or subject matter of the patent claims be listed as inventors. Conception is defined as the formation in the mind of the inventor of a definite and permanent idea of the complete and operative invention[2].

Case Study: U.S. Patent 7,153,856

To illustrate these concepts, let's consider U.S. Patent 7,153,856, though the specific details of this patent are not provided here. Here’s how we would analyze it:

Patent Claims Analysis

  • Independent Claims: Identify the independent claims that define the core of the invention.
  • Dependent Claims: Analyze the dependent claims to see how they further limit and specify the invention.
  • Claim Language: Examine the language used in the claims to understand the scope and breadth of the patent protection.

Patent Scope

  • Claim Length and Count: Evaluate the length and number of independent claims to gauge the patent's scope. Narrower claims with fewer words and fewer claims often indicate a more focused and potentially stronger patent[3].
  • Forward Citations: Check how often the patent is cited by other patents to gauge its impact and relevance in the field.
  • Patent Maintenance Payments: Review the payment history to see if the patent holder has maintained the patent, which can indicate its ongoing value.

Inventorship

  • True and Only Inventors: Verify that the listed inventors are the true and only ones who conceived the idea. Incorrect or incomplete inventorship can lead to patent invalidation[2].

The Patent Landscape in the United States

Technology Areas

The USPTO classifies patents into various technology areas, such as electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, and computer technology. This classification helps in analyzing trends in patenting focus over time. For example, electrical engineering patents, which include subfields like computer technology and digital communication, have seen significant growth between 2000 and 2018[4].

Global Dossier and Public Search Facilities

Tools like the Global Dossier and the USPTO Public Search Facility are invaluable for researching patents. The Global Dossier provides access to the file histories of related applications from participating IP Offices, while the Public Search Facility in Alexandria, VA, offers public access to patent and trademark information in various formats[1].

Challenges and Considerations

Patent Quality and Scope

Debates over patent quality often focus on the breadth and clarity of patent claims. Broader claims can lead to increased licensing and litigation costs, potentially diminishing innovation incentives. The examination process tends to narrow the scope of patent claims, making them more specific and potentially stronger[3].

Correction of Errors in Inventorship

While mistakes in inventorship can be corrected, deceptive intent in naming inventors can render a patent unenforceable. Ensuring accurate inventorship is crucial to maintaining the enforceability of a patent[2].

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Claims: The claims define the scope and protection of a patent.
  • Inventorship: Accurate determination of true and only inventors is critical.
  • Patent Scope Metrics: Independent claim length and count are useful metrics for evaluating patent scope.
  • Technology Areas: Patents are classified into various technology areas to analyze trends.
  • Tools and Facilities: Resources like the Global Dossier and Public Search Facility aid in patent research.

FAQs

Q: What is the significance of independent claims in a patent? A: Independent claims define the core of the invention and stand alone without reference to other claims, providing the broadest protection.

Q: How is patent scope measured? A: Patent scope can be measured using metrics such as independent claim length and independent claim count, which have explanatory power for several correlates of patent scope.

Q: Why is proper inventorship important in patent applications? A: Proper inventorship is crucial because incorrect or incomplete inventorship can lead to patent invalidation, and deceptive intent can render a patent unenforceable.

Q: What are the benefits of using the Global Dossier service? A: The Global Dossier provides access to the file histories of related applications from participating IP Offices, allowing users to see the patent family, classification, and citation data for these applications.

Q: How does the USPTO classify patents? A: The USPTO classifies patents into various technology areas based on the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) classification, which includes 35 International Patent Classification (IPC) technical fields.

Sources

  1. USPTO - Search for patents - USPTO
  2. Oregon State University - Determining Inventorship for US Patent Applications
  3. SSRN - Patent Claims and Patent Scope
  4. NSF - Invention: U.S. and Comparative Global Trends
  5. USA.gov - U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,153,856

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 7,153,856

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 1169038 ⤷  Subscribe 13C0003 France ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 1169038 ⤷  Subscribe C300567 Netherlands ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 1169038 ⤷  Subscribe C01169038/01 Switzerland ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 1169038 ⤷  Subscribe CA 2013 00006 Denmark ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.