You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 23, 2024

Details for Patent: 7,220,767


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,220,767
Title:Pharmaceutical formulations containing zolmitriptan
Abstract:A pharmaceutical formulation of the 5HT1-agonist, zolmitriptan, for use in intranasal administration. The formulation is useful in treating migraine and related disorders.
Inventor(s): Dearn; Alan Roy (Hertfordshire, GB), Williamson; Sarah Louise (Hertfordshire, GB), Summers; John Simon (Hertfordshire, GB), Coomber; Trevor John (Hertfordshire, GB)
Assignee: AstraZeneca AB (Sodertalje, SE)
Application Number:10/854,959
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 7,220,767
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Formulation; Device;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

United States Patent 7,220,767: A Detailed Analysis of Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

United States Patent 7,220,767, owned by AstraZeneca, pertains to pharmaceutical formulations of the anti-migraine drug zolmitriptan, specifically designed for intranasal administration. This patent is crucial in the treatment of migraines, offering a more convenient and effective route of administration compared to traditional methods.

Background and Motivation

The inventors behind this patent sought to develop a formulation of zolmitriptan that provided fast relief from migraines while avoiding the discomfort and potential side effects associated with subcutaneous injections. This motivation was driven by the need for a more patient-friendly and effective treatment option[1].

Scope of the Patent

The patent covers pharmaceutical formulations of zolmitriptan designed for intranasal administration. Here are the key aspects of the scope:

Intranasal Formulation

The formulation consists of zolmitriptan as the active ingredient, along with excipients such as methyl hydroxybenzoate, propyl hydroxybenzoate, citrate buffer, and sufficient hydrochloric acid to adjust the pH to 7. This composition is designed to facilitate direct mucosal absorption, which is believed to contribute to the rapid relief experienced by migraine sufferers[1].

Administration Route

The intranasal route of administration was chosen to avoid the drawbacks of other methods, such as subcutaneous injections, which can be daunting for many patients. This route ensures convenience, effectiveness, and patient acceptance[1].

Claims of the Patent

The patent includes several claims that define the scope of the invention:

Claim 4, 11, 12, and 14 of U.S. Patent 6,760,237

These claims pertain to the pharmaceutical formulations, intranasal administration devices, and aqueous solutions of zolmitriptan. They specify the composition and the method of administration, emphasizing the unique characteristics of the intranasal formulation[2].

Claim 6 and 14-16 of U.S. Patent 7,220,767

These claims further detail the specific components of the formulation and the conditions under which they are effective. They also cover the use of zolmitriptan in its pure form, without the need for an active metabolite, which was a point of contention in the patent validity disputes[2].

Patent Landscape and Litigation

The patent landscape surrounding U.S. Patent 7,220,767 has been marked by significant litigation, particularly regarding the validity and non-obviousness of the claims.

Non-Obviousness

The Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's decision that the claims were not obvious. The prior art taught away from formulating zolmitriptan for intranasal administration, suggesting that the active metabolite of zolmitriptan was more effective. This made it unlikely that a person of ordinary skill in the art would have attempted to create a nasal spray with zolmitriptan alone[2].

Licensing Agreement and Commercial Success

The licensing agreement between AstraZeneca and Impax in 2012 was cited as evidence of non-obviousness and commercial success. This agreement established a nexus between the patents and the commercial success of the product, further supporting the validity of the claims[2].

Challenges and Appeals

Lannett Holdings Inc. and Lannett Co. Inc. challenged the validity of the patents by filing an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) for a generic version of ZomigĀ® Nasal Spray. However, the district court and the Federal Circuit ruled in favor of AstraZeneca and Impax, affirming the non-obviousness and validity of the patents[2].

Impact on Migraine Treatment

The intranasal formulation of zolmitriptan has significantly impacted the treatment of migraines by offering a more convenient, effective, and patient-friendly option. This formulation bypasses the gastrointestinal system, providing faster absorption and relief compared to oral medications.

Key Takeaways

  • Intranasal Formulation: The patent covers a unique intranasal formulation of zolmitriptan, designed for rapid relief from migraines.
  • Non-Obviousness: The claims were found to be non-obvious due to prior art teaching away from intranasal administration of zolmitriptan.
  • Litigation: The patent validity was upheld in court against challenges from generic manufacturers.
  • Commercial Success: The licensing agreement and commercial success of ZomigĀ® supported the validity of the patents.
  • Patient Benefits: The intranasal route offers a more convenient and effective treatment option for migraine sufferers.

FAQs

What is the main active ingredient in the intranasal formulation covered by U.S. Patent 7,220,767?

The main active ingredient is zolmitriptan, a selective serotonin receptor agonist.

Why was the intranasal route chosen for this formulation?

The intranasal route was chosen to avoid the discomfort and potential side effects associated with subcutaneous injections and to provide faster relief.

What were the key challenges in the litigation surrounding this patent?

The main challenge was proving the non-obviousness of the claims, as prior art suggested that the active metabolite of zolmitriptan was more effective.

How did the licensing agreement impact the patent validity?

The licensing agreement between AstraZeneca and Impax supported the non-obviousness and commercial success of the patents, helping to establish their validity.

What is the significance of this patent in the treatment of migraines?

This patent has introduced a more convenient, effective, and patient-friendly treatment option for migraines, offering rapid relief through intranasal administration.

Sources

  1. US7220767B2 - Pharmaceutical formulations containing zolmitriptan. Google Patents.
  2. Nasal Spray Patents Covering Migraine Drug Zomig Not Invalid As Obvious. IPWatchdog.
  3. Patent Claims Research Dataset. USPTO.
  4. Search for patents - USPTO. USPTO.
  5. Pharmaceutical drugs covered by patent 7,220,767. DrugPatentWatch.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,220,767

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 7,220,767

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom9928578.5Dec 03, 1999

International Family Members for US Patent 7,220,767

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 291914 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 1715701 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 778092 ⤷  Subscribe
Brazil 0016138 ⤷  Subscribe
Canada 2392050 ⤷  Subscribe
China 1222287 ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.