You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 6, 2025

Details for Patent: 7,320,969


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 7,320,969 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 7,320,969 protects SEASONIQUE and is included in one NDA.

This patent has forty-one patent family members in twenty-two countries.

Summary for Patent: 7,320,969
Title:Oral contraceptives to prevent pregnancy and diminish premenstrual symptomatology
Abstract:This invention relates to a method of preventing pregnancy and treating PMS including PMDD. More particularly, the invention relates to a method, which involves administering one of several combination oral contraceptive regimens in combination with an antidepressant and a kit containing the same.
Inventor(s): Bell; Robert G. (Palm Harbor, FL), Ben-Maimon; Carole (Merion, PA), Iskold; Beata (Livingston, NJ)
Assignee: Duramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Cincinnati, OH)
Application Number:10/309,313
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 7,320,969
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Delivery;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 7,320,969

To delve into the specifics of United States Patent 7,320,969, it is crucial to understand the broader context of patent law, the process of patent application, and the metrics used to evaluate patent scope and claims.

Patent Law Basics

Patent law in the United States is governed by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), which is responsible for granting patents and registering trademarks[2].

Patent Eligibility and Application Process

For a patent to be granted, the invention must meet the criteria of patent eligibility, which includes novelty, non-obviousness, and usefulness. The application process involves several steps, including filing, examination, and potential continuation procedures[1][4].

Determining Inventorship

Inventorship is a critical aspect of patent law. The true and only inventors must be listed on the patent application. Inventorship is determined by identifying those who conceived the idea or subject matter of the patent claims. Conception is defined as the formation in the mind of the inventor of a definite and permanent idea of the complete and operative invention[5].

Patent Scope and Claims

Patent scope is a vital aspect of patent quality and is often measured using metrics such as independent claim length and independent claim count. These metrics help in assessing the breadth and clarity of the patent claims. Narrower claims are generally associated with a higher probability of grant and a shorter examination process[3].

Independent Claim Length and Count

Independent claim length refers to the complexity and detail of the main claims in a patent application. Longer independent claims often indicate more specific and detailed descriptions of the invention, which can make the patent more defensible but also more challenging to obtain. The count of independent claims can also reflect the breadth of the invention, with more claims potentially indicating a broader scope[3].

Patent 7,320,969: A Case Study

Background of the Patent

To analyze the scope and claims of United States Patent 7,320,969, one must first understand the background and context of the patent. This includes the technology field it belongs to, the inventors listed, and the date of filing and grant.

Claims Analysis

  • Independent Claims: Review the independent claims to determine their length and complexity. This will help in understanding the specificity and breadth of the patent.
  • Dependent Claims: Dependent claims build upon the independent claims and provide additional details. Analyzing these claims can help in understanding the full scope of the invention.
  • Claim Language: The language used in the claims is crucial. Clear and concise language can make the patent more enforceable, while ambiguous language can lead to disputes and litigation[3].

Patent Scope Metrics

  • Forward Citations: The number of forward citations (citations by later patents) can indicate the impact and relevance of the patent. Higher forward citations often suggest a more influential patent.
  • Patent Maintenance Payments: The payment history for maintaining the patent can reflect its commercial viability and the owner's commitment to the invention.
  • Breadth of Patent Classes: The number of patent classes the invention falls under can indicate its breadth and applicability across different fields[3].

Examination Process and Continuation Procedures

  • First-Action Allowance Rate: This rate indicates the proportion of applications allowed without further examination. A higher rate suggests that the patent office found the claims clear and valid from the outset.
  • Progenitor Allowance Rate: This rate includes the proportion of progenitor applications allowed without any continuation procedures. It provides insight into the overall success rate of the initial application.
  • Family Allowance Rate: This rate includes the outcomes of continuation applications, showing the overall success of the patent family[4].

Industry Impact and Relevance

Understanding the industry context in which the patent operates is essential. This includes analyzing market trends, competitor patents, and the commercial application of the invention.

Quotes from Industry Experts

Industry experts often provide valuable insights into the significance and impact of a patent. For example, an expert might comment on how the patent has influenced innovation in the field or how it has been used in commercial products.

Illustrative Statistics

Statistics such as the number of patents filed in the same technology field, the success rate of similar patents, and the economic impact of the invention can provide a quantitative perspective on the patent's significance.

Challenges and Controversies

Patents can be subject to various challenges, including disputes over inventorship, claim validity, and scope. Understanding these challenges can provide a more comprehensive view of the patent's landscape.

Legal Precedents

Cases from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit can provide legal precedents that may affect the interpretation and enforcement of the patent. For instance, decisions on proper inventorship or claim construction can be pivotal[5].

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Scope Metrics: Independent claim length and count are crucial metrics for evaluating patent scope.
  • Inventorship: Correctly determining the true and only inventors is vital for the enforceability of the patent.
  • Examination Process: Understanding the different allowance rates and continuation procedures can provide insights into the patent's journey.
  • Industry Impact: Analyzing the patent's impact on the industry and market trends is essential for understanding its relevance.

FAQs

1. What is the significance of independent claim length in patent scope analysis?

Independent claim length indicates the complexity and detail of the main claims, which can affect the patent's defensibility and the likelihood of grant.

2. How is inventorship determined in U.S. patent law?

Inventorship is determined by identifying those who conceived the idea or subject matter of the patent claims, focusing on the conception step rather than the reduction to practice.

3. What are continuation procedures in the patent application process?

Continuation procedures, such as Requests for Continued Examination (RCEs) and continuation-in-part (CIP) applications, allow applicants to continue the examination process or introduce new subject matter.

4. Why are forward citations important for a patent?

Forward citations indicate the impact and relevance of the patent, suggesting its influence on later inventions.

5. How does the USPTO evaluate the breadth of a patent?

The USPTO evaluates the breadth of a patent using metrics such as the number of patent classes, independent claim length, and the outcomes of continuation applications.

Cited Sources

  1. BitLaw: Summary and Detailed Explanations of Patent Law.
  2. USAGov: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).
  3. SSRN: Patent Claims and Patent Scope.
  4. Yale Journal of Law & Technology: What Is the Probability of Receiving a US Patent?
  5. Oregon State University: Determining Inventorship for US Patent Applications.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,320,969

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Teva Branded Pharm SEASONIQUE ethinyl estradiol; levonorgestrel TABLET;ORAL 021840-001 May 25, 2006 AB RX Yes Yes ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe PREVENTION OF PREGNANCY IN WOMEN WHO ELECT TO USE ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES AS A METHOD OF CONTRACEPTION ⤷  Subscribe
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 7,320,969

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 1453521 ⤷  Subscribe 122015000093 Germany ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 1453521 ⤷  Subscribe CA 2016 00016 Denmark ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 1453521 ⤷  Subscribe 93156 Luxembourg ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 1453521 ⤷  Subscribe 300814 Netherlands ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 1453521 ⤷  Subscribe C20160011 00192 Estonia ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 1453521 ⤷  Subscribe 39/2015 Austria ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.