You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 7,348,317


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,348,317
Title:Aqueous compositions containing metronidazole
Abstract:An aqueous solution of metronidazole in which the concentration of metronidazole is higher than 0.75%. The solution contains a combination of solubility-enhancing agents, one of which is a cyclodextrin such as beta-cyclodextrin and the second is niacin or niacinamide. Methods of manufacture and therapeutic use of the solution are disclosed.
Inventor(s): Chang; Yunik (Sonoma, CA), Dow; Gordon J. (Santa Rosa, CA)
Assignee: Dow Pharmaceutical Sciences (Petaluma, CA)
Application Number:11/037,430
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 7,348,317
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Device; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of a US Patent: A Detailed Analysis of US Patent 7,348,317

Introduction

When navigating the complex world of patents, understanding the scope and claims of a patent is crucial for inventors, businesses, and legal professionals. This article will delve into the specifics of US Patent 7,348,317, using it as a case study to explain the broader concepts of patent scope, claims, and the patent landscape in the United States.

What is a Patent?

A patent is a government grant that gives the inventor the exclusive right to make, use, and sell an invention for a specified period, usually 20 years from the filing date of the patent application. In the US, patents are granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)[2].

Patent Application and Grant Process

The process of obtaining a patent involves several steps, including filing a patent application, undergoing examination by the USPTO, and potentially using continuation procedures to address any issues raised during the examination. Only about 55.8% of patent applications are granted without using continuation procedures[1].

Determining Inventorship

Inventorship is a critical aspect of patent law. The true and only inventors must be listed on the patent application. This involves identifying those who conceived the idea or subject matter of the patent claims. Conception is defined as the formation in the mind of the inventor of a definite and permanent idea of the complete and operative invention[2].

Patent Claims

Patent claims are the heart of a patent, defining the scope of the invention and what is protected. Claims must be clear, concise, and supported by the description in the patent specification. The Patent Claims Research Dataset by the USPTO provides detailed information on claims from US patents and applications, including claim-level statistics and document-level statistics[3].

Types of Claims

  • Independent Claims: These claims stand alone and define the invention without reference to other claims.
  • Dependent Claims: These claims refer back to and further limit an independent claim.
  • Method Claims: These claims describe a process or method.
  • Apparatus Claims: These claims describe a physical device or system.

Patent Scope

The scope of a patent is determined by its claims. The broader the claims, the wider the scope of protection. However, broad claims must be carefully crafted to avoid being deemed invalid due to lack of support in the specification or prior art.

Patent Scope Measurements

The USPTO has developed measures of patent scope, including the analysis of claim dependency relationships and newly-developed statistics. These measures help in understanding the breadth and depth of patent protection[3].

Case Study: US Patent 7,348,317

To illustrate these concepts, let's consider US Patent 7,348,317, though the specific details of this patent are not provided here. Here’s how the general principles apply:

Patent Title and Abstract

The title and abstract provide a brief overview of the invention. This is crucial for initial searches and understanding the general scope of the patent.

Background of the Invention

This section explains the context and prior art related to the invention, helping to establish the novelty and non-obviousness of the invention.

Summary of the Invention

This section provides a concise description of the invention, highlighting its key features and how it differs from prior art.

Detailed Description of the Invention

Here, the inventor provides a detailed explanation of the invention, including drawings and diagrams. This section must support the claims and ensure that one skilled in the art could replicate the invention.

Claims

The claims section is where the inventor defines the scope of the invention. Each claim must be carefully worded to ensure it is valid and enforceable.

Example of Claims Analysis

For instance, if US Patent 7,348,317 is for a new type of medical device, the claims might include:

  • Independent Claim 1: A medical device comprising a sensor, a processor, and a display, wherein the sensor detects a physiological parameter and the processor analyzes the parameter to display a result.
  • Dependent Claim 2: The medical device of claim 1, wherein the sensor is a non-invasive sensor.

Patent Landscape

The patent landscape refers to the overall environment of existing patents and applications in a particular field. Understanding this landscape is essential for inventors to avoid infringement and for businesses to strategize their intellectual property.

Global Dossier

Tools like the Global Dossier provided by the USPTO allow users to see the patent family for a specific application, including related applications filed at participating IP Offices. This helps in navigating the global patent landscape[4].

Challenges and Considerations

Continuation Procedures

Many patent applications utilize continuation procedures to address issues raised during examination. These procedures can significantly impact the allowance rate and the final scope of the patent[1].

Small Claims Patent Court

There have been discussions and studies on the feasibility of a small claims patent court to handle disputes involving smaller entities and lower-stakes patents. This could potentially streamline the process and reduce costs for smaller inventors and businesses[5].

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Claims: The claims define the scope of the invention and are crucial for determining what is protected.
  • Patent Scope: The scope is determined by the claims and must be supported by the specification.
  • Inventorship: Correctly identifying the true and only inventors is essential for the validity of the patent.
  • Patent Landscape: Understanding the existing patents and applications in a field is vital for strategic planning and avoiding infringement.
  • Continuation Procedures: These can affect the allowance rate and final scope of the patent.

FAQs

What is the significance of patent claims in a US patent?

Patent claims define the scope of the invention and determine what is protected under the patent. They must be clear, concise, and supported by the specification.

How is inventorship determined in a US patent application?

Inventorship is determined by identifying those who conceived the idea or subject matter of the patent claims. This involves the conception step, where the idea must be definite and permanent.

What is the Global Dossier, and how does it help in patent searches?

The Global Dossier is a service provided by the USPTO that allows users to see the patent family for a specific application, including related applications filed at participating IP Offices. This helps in navigating the global patent landscape.

What is the purpose of a small claims patent court?

A small claims patent court is proposed to handle disputes involving smaller entities and lower-stakes patents, aiming to streamline the process and reduce costs.

How do continuation procedures affect the patent application process?

Continuation procedures can be used to address issues raised during examination, affecting the allowance rate and the final scope of the patent. They can include requests for continued examination (RCEs) and other types of continuations.

Sources

  1. Carley, M., Hegde, D., & Marco, A. (2015). What Is the Probability of Receiving a US Patent? Yale Journal of Law & Technology, 17, 203.
  2. Gattari, D. (2005). Determining Inventorship for US Patent Applications. Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal, 17(5).
  3. USPTO. (2017). Patent Claims Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://www.uspto.gov/ip-policy/economic-research/research-datasets/patent-claims-research-dataset
  4. USPTO. (2018). Search for patents. Retrieved from https://www.uspto.gov/patents/search
  5. ACUS. (2022). U.S. Patent Small Claims Court. Retrieved from https://www.acus.gov/research-projects/us-patent-small-claims-court

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,348,317

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.