You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 7,915,229


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,915,229
Title:Compositions containing piperacillin and tazobactam useful for injection
Abstract: An aminocarboxylic acid chelating agent, preferably EDTA, or a salt thereof has been found to be useful for inhibiting particulate formation in piperacillin/tazobactam parenteral combinations. The composition may also contain a buffer, preferably citrate, and optionally an aminoglycoside. The product may be in the form of a frozen composition that can be thawed for use. The product may also be in the form of a cryodesiccated powder that can be reconstituted by addition of an aqueous vehicle to reform a solution.
Inventor(s): Cohen; Jonathan Marc (Monroe, NY), Shah; Syed Muzafar (East Hanover, NJ), Ofslager; Christian Luther (Newburgh, NY), Fawzi; Mahdi Bakir (Morristown, NJ)
Assignee: Wyeth Holdings Corporation (Madison, NJ)
Application Number:12/370,794
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Compound; Dosage form; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 7,915,229

Introduction

Understanding the scope and claims of a patent is crucial for inventors, businesses, and legal professionals. This article will provide a detailed analysis of the scope and claims of United States Patent 7,915,229, using various tools and resources available through the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and other international patent databases.

Understanding Patent 7,915,229

To begin, one must identify the patent in question. Here, we are analyzing U.S. Patent 7,915,229. This involves accessing the patent document through the USPTO's patent search tools.

Accessing the Patent Document

The USPTO provides several tools to access patent documents:

  • Patent Public Search: This is a modern web-based patent search application that replaced older tools like PubEast and PubWest. It offers enhanced access to prior art and allows users to search for patents by various criteria, including patent number[1].
  • PatFT and AppFT: These databases provide full-text access to U.S. granted patents and patent applications, respectively. For Patent 7,915,229, you would use the PatFT database[4].

Analyzing the Claims

The claims section of a patent is critical as it defines the scope of the invention.

Claim Structure

  • Independent Claims: These claims stand alone and define the invention without reference to other claims.
  • Dependent Claims: These claims refer back to and further limit the independent claims.

Claim Analysis

To analyze the claims of Patent 7,915,229, you would:

  • Identify the independent and dependent claims.
  • Understand the language and scope of each claim.
  • Use resources like the Patent Claims Research Dataset provided by the USPTO, which contains detailed information on claims from U.S. patents and applications. This dataset can help in understanding claim-level statistics and document-level statistics, including measures of patent scope[3].

Understanding the Scope of the Patent

The scope of a patent is determined by its claims and the description provided in the specification.

Specification and Description

  • The specification section of the patent provides a detailed description of the invention, including drawings and examples.
  • This section helps in understanding the context and limitations of the claims.

Prior Art and Citation Data

  • Common Citation Document (CCD): This tool consolidates prior art cited by all participating offices for the family members of a patent application. It helps in visualizing the search results for the same invention produced by several offices on a single page[1].
  • Global Dossier: This service provides access to the file histories of related applications from participating IP Offices, including citation data and office actions. This can help in understanding how the patent office viewed the prior art and the patentability of the invention[1].

International Patent Landscape

To fully understand the scope and claims of a patent, it is essential to look at the international patent landscape.

Searching International Patent Offices

  • European Patent Office (EPO): Use esp@cenet to search European and international patents.
  • World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO): Use PATENTSCOPE to search full-text international patent applications.
  • Other International Offices: Search databases provided by Japan, China, Korea, and other countries to see if similar patents have been granted or applied for abroad[1].

Patent Eligibility and Subject Matter

The patent eligibility of the invention under Section 101 of the Patent Act is another critical aspect.

Section 101 and Judicial Exceptions

  • The Supreme Court has narrowed patent-eligible subject matter through decisions like Bilski, Mayo, and Alice. These decisions have broadened the judicially developed exceptions to patent-eligible subject matter[5].
  • The Alice/Mayo test is used to determine if patent claims are directed to an ineligible concept. If they are, the claims must have an inventive concept to be patent-eligible[5].

Practical Steps for Analysis

Step 1: Locate the Patent

Use the USPTO's Patent Public Search tool or PatFT database to locate and download the full text of Patent 7,915,229.

Step 2: Read and Analyze the Claims

Carefully read the independent and dependent claims to understand the scope of the invention.

Step 3: Review the Specification

Study the specification and description to contextualize the claims.

Step 4: Check Prior Art and Citation Data

Use the CCD and Global Dossier tools to understand the prior art and how the patent office viewed the patentability of the invention.

Step 5: Examine International Patent Landscape

Search international patent databases to identify similar patents or applications abroad.

Step 6: Evaluate Patent Eligibility

Apply the Alice/Mayo test to determine if the patent claims are directed to an eligible concept under Section 101 of the Patent Act.

Key Takeaways

  • Detailed Claim Analysis: Understanding the claims is crucial for determining the scope of the patent.
  • Prior Art and Citation Data: Tools like CCD and Global Dossier help in understanding the prior art and patent office actions.
  • International Landscape: Searching international patent databases is essential for a comprehensive analysis.
  • Patent Eligibility: Ensuring the patent claims meet the criteria under Section 101 of the Patent Act is vital.

FAQs

Q: How do I access the full text of a U.S. patent? A: You can access the full text of a U.S. patent using the USPTO's Patent Public Search tool or the PatFT database[1].

Q: What is the importance of analyzing the claims of a patent? A: Analyzing the claims helps in understanding the scope and limitations of the invention, which is critical for determining patentability and potential infringement[3].

Q: How do I check if a similar patent exists internationally? A: Use international patent databases such as esp@cenet, PATENTSCOPE, and other country-specific databases to search for similar patents abroad[1].

Q: What is the Alice/Mayo test, and why is it important? A: The Alice/Mayo test is used to determine if patent claims are directed to an ineligible concept under Section 101 of the Patent Act. It helps in ensuring that the claims have an inventive concept to be patent-eligible[5].

Q: Where can I find resources to help with patent searching and analysis? A: Resources include the USPTO's Public Search Facility, Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs), and online tutorials provided by the USPTO[1].

Sources

  1. USPTO - Search for patents: https://www.uspto.gov/patents/search
  2. USA.gov - U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO): https://www.usa.gov/agencies/u-s-patent-and-trademark-office
  3. USPTO - Patent Claims Research Dataset: https://www.uspto.gov/ip-policy/economic-research/research-datasets/patent-claims-research-dataset
  4. Harvard Library - Patent search: A comparative table of databases: https://asklib.library.hbs.edu/faq/266950
  5. CRS Reports - Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Reform: An Overview: https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF12563

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,915,229

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.