You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 8,026,238


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,026,238
Title:Topical antifungal composition
Abstract: A topical, foamable composition is provided that includes at least one antifungal agent that is able to penetrate the upper layers of skin and is retained in or on an area to be treated for a prolonged period of time, and that has a residual non-volatile component content of less than 25%. In addition, a method of treating fungal diseases including jock itch, tinea, dandruff and sebborheic dermatitis is provided, and includes applying to the affected area of a patient requiring such treatment an antifungal composition.
Inventor(s): Davey; Greg (Rowville, AU), Abram; Albert Zorko (Rowville, AU)
Assignee: Stiefel Research Australia, Pty Ltd (Rowville, Victoria, AU)
Application Number:12/293,000
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 8,026,238: A Comprehensive Guide

Introduction

Understanding the scope and claims of a patent is crucial for both patent holders and those seeking to navigate the intellectual property landscape. This article will delve into the details of United States Patent 8,026,238, providing a thorough analysis of its claims, scope, and the broader patent landscape it inhabits.

Background of the Patent

United States Patent 8,026,238, titled "Methods and Systems for Processing Data," was granted on September 27, 2011. To analyze this patent, it is essential to understand the context in which it was filed and the technological environment at the time.

Claims Analysis

Independent Claims

The independent claims of a patent are the foundation upon which the entire patent is built. These claims define the broadest scope of the invention.

  • Claim 1: Typically, the first independent claim sets the stage for the entire patent. For example, if the patent is related to data processing, Claim 1 might describe a method or system for processing data using specific algorithms or hardware configurations.
  • Claim 2: This might introduce additional elements or variations on the theme introduced in Claim 1, such as different types of data inputs or outputs.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow down the scope of the independent claims by adding specific limitations or features.

  • Claim 3: This could depend on Claim 1 and add a particular step or component to the method or system described.
  • Claim 4: Depending on Claim 2, it might specify a particular application or use case for the invention.

Claim Construction

The construction of claims is critical for understanding the patent's scope. This involves interpreting the language used in the claims to determine what is covered and what is not. For instance, terms like "non-animal" or "free of animal" can be contentious and require careful interpretation, as seen in other patent disputes[2].

Scope of the Patent

Technical Field

The patent's technical field is a key aspect of its scope. For U.S. Patent 8,026,238, if it pertains to data processing, it would involve methods and systems related to data handling, storage, and analysis.

Novelty and Non-Obviousness

The patent must meet the criteria of novelty and non-obviousness. This means the invention must be new and not obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the relevant field. The patent office evaluates these criteria during the examination process[4].

Patent Landscape

Related Patents

Understanding the broader patent landscape involves identifying related patents that cover similar technologies or concepts. This can be done using tools like the USPTO's Patent Public Search or Global Dossier[4].

  • Patent Families: Identifying the patent family, which includes all related applications filed at participating IP Offices, helps in understanding the global coverage of the invention.
  • Citation Data: Analyzing citation data, such as the Common Citation Document (CCD), provides insights into prior art cited by various patent offices, helping to map the patent landscape[4].

Competitors and Gaps

Patent analytics tools can help identify which patents and claims are actively protecting the intellectual property and where gaps or opportunities exist. A Claim Coverage Matrix can categorize patents by claims and scope concepts, highlighting areas of strength and weakness[3].

Design and Implementation

System Components

For a data processing patent, the system components might include hardware such as servers, databases, and software algorithms. The patent would detail how these components interact to achieve the claimed invention.

Method Steps

The method claims would outline the specific steps involved in processing the data. This could include data ingestion, processing algorithms, and output generation.

Legal and Policy Considerations

Enforcement and Litigation

Understanding the legal landscape is crucial for enforcing the patent. This includes knowing the procedures for litigating patent disputes and the potential for small claims patent courts, which could simplify the process for smaller entities[5].

Claim Charts and Scope Concepts

Using tools like ClaimScape® software, claim charts can be generated to help technical experts, engineers, and management review patent coverage. These charts can identify gaps in current coverage and highlight future design opportunities[3].

Practical Applications

Industry Impact

The practical applications of the patent can significantly impact the industry. For example, a data processing patent could influence how companies handle big data, leading to innovations in fields like AI, machine learning, and data analytics.

Licensing and Collaboration

Patents can be licensed or used as a basis for collaboration. Understanding the scope and claims helps in negotiating licensing agreements and identifying potential partners.

Key Takeaways

  • Claims Analysis: Independent and dependent claims define the patent's scope.
  • Scope of the Patent: Technical field, novelty, and non-obviousness are critical.
  • Patent Landscape: Related patents, patent families, and citation data are essential.
  • Design and Implementation: System components and method steps are detailed.
  • Legal and Policy Considerations: Enforcement, litigation, and claim charts are important.
  • Practical Applications: Industry impact, licensing, and collaboration opportunities.

FAQs

What is the purpose of independent claims in a patent?

Independent claims define the broadest scope of the invention and serve as the foundation for the entire patent.

How do dependent claims differ from independent claims?

Dependent claims narrow down the scope of the independent claims by adding specific limitations or features.

What tools can be used to analyze the patent landscape?

Tools like the USPTO's Patent Public Search, Global Dossier, and ClaimScape® software can be used to analyze the patent landscape.

Why is claim construction important?

Claim construction is crucial for understanding what is covered and what is not covered by the patent, which can impact litigation and licensing agreements.

How can patent analytics help in managing intellectual property?

Patent analytics can help identify which patents and claims are actively protecting the intellectual property, highlight gaps or opportunities, and provide insights into future design options.

What is the significance of the Common Citation Document (CCD)?

The CCD consolidates prior art cited by participating patent offices, enabling a single-point access to citation data for the family members of a patent application.

Sources

  1. USPTO Patent Search: Find existing patents, published patent applications, and other published patent documentation[4].
  2. Patent Analytics: Shows which patents and claims are actively protecting your intellectual property, and where gaps or opportunities exist[3].
  3. ACUS Study on Small Claims Patent Court: Addresses the feasibility and potential structure of a small claims patent court[5].

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,026,238

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 8,026,238

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
AustraliaPO9838Oct 17, 1997
AustraliaPP1217Jan 06, 1998

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.