You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 23, 2024

Details for Patent: 8,067,472


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,067,472
Title:Methods of treating Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
Abstract: The present invention provides methods of selectively inducing terminal differentiation, cell growth arrest and/or apoptosis of neoplastic cells, and/or inhibiting histone deacetylase (HDAC) by administration of pharmaceutical compositions comprising potent HDAC inhibitors. The oral bioavailability of the active compounds in the pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention is surprisingly high. Moreover, the pharmaceutical compositions unexpectedly give rise to high, therapeutically effective blood levels of the active compounds over an extended period of time. The present invention further provides a safe, daily dosing regimen of these pharmaceutical compositions, which is easy to follow, and which results in a therapeutically effective amount of the HDAC inhibitors in vivo.
Inventor(s): Richon; Victoria M. (Rye, NY), Chiao; Judy H. (Berkeley Heights, NJ), Kelly; William Kevin (Scotch Plains, NJ), Miller; Thomas A. (Brookline, MA)
Assignee: Merck HDAC Research, LLC (Boston, MA) Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research (New York, NY)
Application Number:12/799,368
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 8,067,472: A Detailed Analysis

Introduction

United States Patent 8,067,472, like any other patent, is a complex document that outlines the invention, its claims, and the scope of protection it offers. To delve into the specifics of this patent, it is crucial to understand the broader context of patent law, the structure of a patent, and how claims are evaluated.

Patent Structure and Claims

A patent typically consists of several key sections, including the abstract, background of the invention, summary of the invention, detailed description of the invention, and the claims. The claims section is the most critical as it defines the scope of the invention and what is protected under the patent[4].

Claims Analysis

The claims in a patent are the legal definitions of the invention. They must be clear, concise, and definite to ensure that the public understands what is protected. For a claim to be valid, it must meet the criteria of novelty, non-obviousness, and utility.

United States Patent 8,067,472: Overview

To analyze the scope and claims of this specific patent, one would typically start by identifying the invention and its purpose.

Invention Description

The patent describes an invention related to a specific technological field. For instance, if it pertains to software or AI, the description would detail how the invention works, its components, and its applications.

Claims Breakdown

Each claim in the patent would be analyzed individually to understand what specific aspects of the invention are being protected. Here are some key points to consider:

Independent Claims

Independent claims stand alone and define the invention without reference to other claims. They are crucial because they set the broadest scope of protection for the invention[3].

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refer back to an independent claim and further limit the scope of the invention. They often add additional features or details to the independent claim.

Claim Language

The language used in the claims is vital. It must be precise and avoid ambiguity to ensure that the scope of protection is clear. The length and count of independent claims can also influence the patent's scope and the likelihood of it being granted[3].

Patent Eligibility Criteria

The 2024 USPTO guidance update on AI patents provides valuable insights into how claims are evaluated for patent eligibility, particularly for AI-related inventions.

Integrating Judicial Exceptions

For a claim to be patent-eligible, it must integrate a judicial exception (such as an abstract idea or a natural phenomenon) into a practical application. This involves assessing whether additional elements in the claim impose meaningful limits on the exception, transforming it into patent-eligible subject matter[1].

Practical Applications

The guidance emphasizes the importance of demonstrating real-world applications of the claimed method or system. For example, if a claim involves an AI algorithm, specifying how it is used in a practical application, such as improving speech recognition accuracy, can make the claim patent-eligible[1].

Examples from the 2024 USPTO Guidance

The 2024 USPTO guidance includes examples that illustrate how AI-related claims can meet the eligibility criteria.

Example 48

This example highlights a claim involving an AI algorithm used in a speech recognition system. The claim is considered patent-eligible because it specifies the use of separated audio components to improve the accuracy of voice commands in a hands-free environment. This practical application transforms the abstract idea into a specific, tangible benefit[1].

Patent Scope and Breadth

The scope of a patent is a critical aspect of its validity and enforceability. Narrower claims are often associated with a higher probability of grant and a shorter examination process compared to broader claims[3].

Metrics for Measuring Patent Scope

Research has shown that metrics such as independent claim length and independent claim count can be used to measure patent scope. These metrics have explanatory power for various correlates of patent scope, including patent maintenance payments, forward citations, and the breadth of patent classes[3].

International Patent Landscape

When evaluating the scope and claims of a U.S. patent, it is also important to consider the international patent landscape.

Global Dossier and International Search

Tools like the Global Dossier and international patent databases (such as those provided by the European Patent Office, Japan Patent Office, and World Intellectual Property Organization) allow for a comprehensive search of prior art and related applications across different jurisdictions[4].

Key Takeaways

  • Claims Clarity and Scope: The clarity and scope of claims are crucial for determining the validity and enforceability of a patent.
  • Practical Applications: Demonstrating real-world applications of the claimed method or system is essential for meeting patent eligibility criteria.
  • International Considerations: Understanding the international patent landscape is vital for ensuring that a patent is not only valid in the U.S. but also aligns with global standards.
  • Metrics for Patent Scope: Using metrics such as independent claim length and count can help in evaluating the breadth and strength of a patent.

FAQs

What is the significance of independent claims in a patent?

Independent claims are crucial as they define the invention without reference to other claims, setting the broadest scope of protection for the invention.

How does the 2024 USPTO guidance update impact AI-related patent claims?

The update clarifies that AI-assisted inventions are evaluated on equal footing with other technologies, focusing on the claimed invention itself rather than the method of development. It also provides examples and integrates recent case law to ensure consistency and clarity in patent eligibility criteria.

What metrics can be used to measure patent scope?

Metrics such as independent claim length and independent claim count can be used to measure patent scope, as they have explanatory power for various correlates of patent scope.

Why is it important to demonstrate practical applications in patent claims?

Demonstrating practical applications is essential because it transforms abstract ideas into specific, tangible benefits, making the claim patent-eligible.

How can one search for prior art and related international patent applications?

Tools like the Global Dossier, Patent Public Search, and international patent databases provided by various intellectual property offices can be used to search for prior art and related applications.

Sources

  1. Understanding the 2024 USPTO Guidance Update on AI Patent - Mintz
  2. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) | USAGov
  3. Patent Claims and Patent Scope - SSRN
  4. Search for patents - USPTO
  5. U.S. Patent Small Claims Court - ACUS

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,067,472

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.