You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 8,182,835


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,182,835
Title:Sustained-release liposomal anesthetic compositions
Abstract: The invention provides a method for obtaining local anesthetics encapsulated in liposomes, such as multivesicular liposomes, with high encapsulation efficiency and slow release in vivo. When the encapsulated anesthetic is administered as a single intracutaneous dose, the duration of anesthesia and half-life of the drug at the local injection site is increased as compared to injection of unencapsulated anesthetic. The maximum tolerated dose of the encapsulated anesthetic is also markedly increased in the liposomal formulation over injection of unencapsulated anesthetic. These results show that the liposomal formulation of local anesthetic is useful for sustained local infiltration and nerve block anesthesia.
Inventor(s): Kim; Sinil (Solana Beach, CA), Kim; Taehee (Los Angeles, CA), Murdande; Sharad (Groton, CT)
Assignee: Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (San Diego, CA)
Application Number:11/097,756
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Formulation; Compound; Dosage form; Process; Composition; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 8,182,835

Introduction

The United States Patent 8,182,835, titled "Sustained-release liposomal anesthetic compositions," is a significant patent in the pharmaceutical industry, particularly in the field of anesthetic formulations. This patent, now expired, was held by Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and is part of a broader patent family related to liposomal anesthetic compositions.

Background of the Patent

The patent was granted on September 18, 2012, and expired on September 18, 2018, due to fee-related issues[4].

  • Invention Overview: The patent describes a method for obtaining local anesthetics encapsulated in liposomes, such as multivesicular liposomes (MVL), with high encapsulation efficiency. This technology is crucial for sustained-release formulations of anesthetics like bupivacaine[4].

Key Claims and Scope

Claim Construction

The scope of the patent claims is defined by the language used in the claims themselves, the specification, and the prosecution history of the patent. Here are some key aspects:

  • Claim Language: The claims define the scope of the patentee's rights. For example, claim 1 of the patent might specify the composition and method of preparing the sustained-release liposomal anesthetic[4].

    • Ordinary and Customary Meaning: The words of the claim are generally given their ordinary and customary meaning, which is the meaning that a person of ordinary skill in the art (POSA) would understand at the time of the invention[1].
  • Specification and Prosecution History: The patent's specification is the single best guide to the meaning of a disputed term. The prosecution history, including prior art cited during examination, also plays a crucial role in understanding the scope of the claims[1].

Specific Terms and Their Construction

In patent disputes, specific terms within the claims can be contentious. Here are a few examples relevant to this patent:

  • Shear Speed Terms: In the context of preparing liposomal compositions, terms related to shear speed might be crucial. The court would look at the intrinsic evidence, such as the specification and prosecution history, to determine the meaning of these terms[1].
  • pH Terms: The pH range specified in the claims could also be a point of contention. The court would analyze the specification and any relevant declarations or exhibits to determine the intended pH range[2].

Legal Standard for Claim Construction

The legal standard for constructing patent claims is well-established:

  • Markman Hearing: The court's duty is to resolve disputes regarding the scope of claim terms through a Markman hearing, as seen in cases like Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc.[1].
  • Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Evidence: The court first looks to intrinsic evidence (claims, specification, and prosecution history) and then considers extrinsic evidence if necessary[1].

Impact on the Pharmaceutical Industry

The patent landscape for pharmaceuticals, especially for sustained-release formulations, is complex and highly regulated.

  • Genus Claims: Patents in the pharmaceutical industry often involve genus claims, which attempt to capture a class of compounds rather than specific embodiments. However, recent jurisprudence, particularly from the Federal Circuit, has made it challenging to obtain and maintain such claims due to strict application of disclosure laws like 35 U.S.C. § 112(a)[3].
  • Market and Innovation: The market for therapeutic pharmaceuticals and biologics is vast and expanding. Innovators need robust and predictable patent protection to support their commercialization strategies. However, the current rigid stance on genus claims can hinder this by making it difficult to claim the full scope of an invention without violating disclosure requirements[3].

Expiration and Current Status

The patent 8,182,835 has expired due to fee-related issues. However, its legacy continues in the form of related patents and ongoing litigation.

  • Related Patents: Other patents in the same family, such as U.S. Patent Nos. 11,426,348, 11,278,494, and 11,357,727, are still active and subject to ongoing legal disputes[1].

Illustrative Statistics and Industry Impact

The pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries invest billions of dollars in developing new therapeutics. For instance:

  • Market Size: The market for therapeutic antibodies alone is estimated to reach $300 billion by 2025, highlighting the significance of robust patent protection in these industries[3].

Quotes from Industry Experts

Industry experts often emphasize the importance of clear and robust patent claims:

  • "The scope or breadth of patent claims determine what exactly the inventor is claiming as her invention. Traditionally, the broader the scope of the claim, the more meaningful patent protection in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries."[3]

Highlight and Citation

"Genus claims can fall within the scope of this statute, so long as the claim includes a written description in 'such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same.'"[3]

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Claims: The scope of patent claims is critical and must be clearly defined to ensure meaningful patent protection.
  • Legal Standard: Courts rely on intrinsic evidence to construct patent claims, with extrinsic evidence considered only when necessary.
  • Industry Impact: The pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries face significant challenges due to strict application of disclosure laws, affecting their ability to secure broad and meaningful patent protection.
  • Market Importance: Robust patent protection is essential for innovators to recoup their investments in developing new therapeutics.

FAQs

  1. What is the main invention described in U.S. Patent 8,182,835?

    • The patent describes a method for obtaining local anesthetics encapsulated in liposomes, such as multivesicular liposomes, with high encapsulation efficiency.
  2. Why is claim construction important in patent disputes?

    • Claim construction is crucial as it defines the scope of the patentee's rights and determines the boundaries of the patent owner’s rights.
  3. What is the significance of genus claims in pharmaceutical patents?

    • Genus claims attempt to capture a class of compounds rather than specific embodiments, but recent jurisprudence has made it challenging to obtain and maintain such claims due to strict disclosure laws.
  4. How do courts determine the meaning of disputed terms in patent claims?

    • Courts look to intrinsic evidence (claims, specification, and prosecution history) and then consider extrinsic evidence if necessary.
  5. What is the current status of U.S. Patent 8,182,835?

    • The patent has expired due to fee-related issues.

Sources

  1. Pacira Pharm. v. eVenus Pharm. Labs., Civil Action 22-00718, United States District Court, D. New Jersey, Jun 6, 2023.
  2. PACIRA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al v. EVENUS PHARMACEUTICALS LABORATORIES INC. et al, No. 2:2021cv19829 - Document 187 (D.N.J. 2023).
  3. Eviscerating Patent Scope, DigitalCommons@NYLS.
  4. US8182835B2 - Sustained-release liposomal anesthetic compositions, Google Patents.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,182,835

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 8,182,835

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 463238 ⤷  Subscribe
Austria 535232 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 735588 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 9494298 ⤷  Subscribe
Canada 2304096 ⤷  Subscribe
Cyprus 1110135 ⤷  Subscribe
Germany 69841598 ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.