You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 8,512,747


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,512,747
Title:Pharmaceutical composition for the treatment of acute disorders
Abstract: A pharmaceutical composition for the treatment of acute disorders is described. The composition comprises an essentially water-free, ordered mixture of at least one pharmaceutically active agent in the form of microparticles which are adhered to the surfaces of carrier particles which are substantially larger than the particles of the active agent or agents, and are essentially water-soluble, in combination with the bioadhesion and/or mucoadhesion promoting agent. The invention also relates to a method for preparing the composition and to the use of the composition for the treatment of acute disorders.
Inventor(s): Pettersson; Anders (Kode, SE), Nystrom; Christer (Lidingo, SE)
Assignee: Orexo AB (Uppsala, SE)
Application Number:13/302,720
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,512,747
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 8,512,747: A Detailed Analysis

Introduction

Patents play a crucial role in the pharmaceutical industry, protecting innovations and ensuring exclusivity for a specified period. This article delves into the specifics of United States Patent 8,512,747, examining its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape it inhabits.

Background on Patent 8,512,747

To begin with, it is essential to identify the subject matter of the patent. However, the provided sources do not directly mention Patent 8,512,747. Therefore, we will discuss general principles and methodologies used to analyze patents, which can be applied to this specific patent.

Patent Scope and Claims

Definition of Patent Scope

The scope of a patent refers to the breadth and depth of protection it offers. This is primarily determined by the claims section of the patent, which outlines what the inventor considers to be their invention[3].

Claim Language and Structure

The claims section is crucial as it defines the boundaries of the invention. Independent claims are particularly important as they stand alone and do not rely on other claims. The length and count of independent claims can be metrics used to measure patent scope[3].

Types of Patents in the Pharmaceutical Industry

In the pharmaceutical sector, patents can be categorized into drug substance patents, drug product patents, and method-of-use patents. Each type provides different layers of protection:

  • Drug Substance Patents: Protect the active ingredient itself.
  • Drug Product Patents: Cover the formulation or composition of the drug.
  • Method-of-Use Patents: Protect specific uses of the drug[1].

Analyzing Patent Claims

Claim Clarity and Breadth

The clarity and breadth of patent claims are critical. Clear claims help in understanding the exact scope of protection, while overly broad claims can lead to disputes and litigation. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has noted concerns about overly broad and unclear claims, particularly in software and internet patents[3].

Independent Claim Length and Count

Metrics such as independent claim length and count can be used to assess the scope of a patent. These metrics have been validated to have explanatory power in understanding patent quality and scope[3].

Patent Exclusivities and FDA Regulations

FDA's Orange Book

The FDA's Orange Book is a comprehensive resource that lists approved drug products along with their associated patents and exclusivities. It includes information on drug substance patents, drug product patents, and method-of-use patents. This data is crucial for understanding when generic versions of drugs can enter the market[1][4].

Exclusivity Periods

Patents and exclusivities work together to protect innovative drugs. The exclusivity period can range from a few years to over a decade, depending on the type of exclusivity granted. For example, market exclusivity for new molecular entities can be up to five years[1].

Case Study: Zolpidem Tartrate

While not directly related to Patent 8,512,747, the example of Zolpidem Tartrate illustrates how patent landscapes work:

  • Zolpidem Tartrate, a drug used for insomnia, had multiple patents that expired at different times, allowing generic versions to enter the market once the critical patents expired[2].

Impact on Generic Competition

Launch of Generic Drugs

The expiration of patents and the end of exclusivity periods are key milestones for the launch of generic drugs. For instance, the study by the USPTO and FDA found that the market exclusivity for some drugs ranged from about 3 to about 16 years before generic competition emerged[1].

Role of Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs)

Generic drug manufacturers file ANDAs with the FDA to seek approval for their products. The approval of an ANDA is contingent on the expiration of relevant patents and exclusivities associated with the original drug[1].

Strategic Considerations for Pharmaceutical Companies

Patent Evergreening

Pharmaceutical companies often engage in strategies like patent evergreening, where they file follow-on patents to extend their exclusivity period. This can include patents for new formulations, dosages, or methods of use[1].

Litigation and Licensing

The scope and clarity of patent claims can significantly impact litigation and licensing costs. Overly broad or unclear claims can lead to increased legal disputes and higher costs for both innovator and generic drug manufacturers[3].

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Scope: Defined by the claims section, which outlines the boundaries of the invention.
  • Claim Clarity: Critical for understanding the exact scope of protection and avoiding litigation.
  • FDA Regulations: The Orange Book and exclusivity periods play a crucial role in determining when generic drugs can enter the market.
  • Generic Competition: The expiration of patents and exclusivities is essential for the launch of generic drugs.
  • Strategic Considerations: Pharmaceutical companies use various strategies, including patent evergreening, to extend their exclusivity periods.

FAQs

What is the significance of the claims section in a patent?

The claims section defines the boundaries of the invention and determines the scope of protection.

How do FDA regulations impact the patent landscape for pharmaceuticals?

FDA regulations, particularly the Orange Book, list approved drug products along with their associated patents and exclusivities, which are crucial for understanding when generic versions can enter the market.

What is patent evergreening?

Patent evergreening is a strategy where pharmaceutical companies file follow-on patents to extend their exclusivity period, often including new formulations, dosages, or methods of use.

How do generic drug manufacturers seek approval for their products?

Generic drug manufacturers file Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs) with the FDA, which are contingent on the expiration of relevant patents and exclusivities.

Why is claim clarity important in patents?

Claim clarity is important because it helps in understanding the exact scope of protection and avoids litigation and disputes.

Sources

  1. USPTO-FDA Report on Drug Patent and Exclusivity: USPTO, 2018.
  2. Drug Patents containing Zolpidem Tartrate: Pharsight.
  3. Patent Claims and Patent Scope: Hoover Institution, 2016.
  4. Approved Drug Products - FDA Orange Book: DrugPatentWatch, 2020.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,512,747

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 8,512,747

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Sweden9803240Sep 24, 1998

International Family Members for US Patent 8,512,747

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 2236132 ⤷  Subscribe C300714 Netherlands ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 2236132 ⤷  Subscribe CA 2015 00004 Denmark ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 2236132 ⤷  Subscribe 92636 Luxembourg ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.