You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 24, 2024

Details for Patent: 8,522,778


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,522,778
Title:Nasal devices
Abstract: A nasal delivery device for and a method of delivering a substance to a nasal cavity of a subject, the delivery device including: a nosepiece for fitting to a nostril of a subject; a substance supply unit for supplying a substance for delivery through the nosepiece; and a delivery prevention mechanism for preventing delivery of a substance through the nosepiece until the nosepiece is properly fitted to the nostril of the subject.
Inventor(s): Djupesland; Per Gisle (Oslo, NO)
Assignee: OptiNose AS (Oslo, NO)
Application Number:12/757,626
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Delivery; Device;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 8,522,778: A Detailed Analysis

Introduction

Patents are a cornerstone of innovation, providing exclusive rights to inventors for their creations. The United States Patent 8,522,778, though not specifically detailed in the provided sources, can be analyzed through a general understanding of patent scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape. Here, we will delve into the key components of patent analysis and apply these principles to understand the significance and implications of any patent, including the hypothetical U.S. Patent 8,522,778.

What is a Patent?

A patent is a form of intellectual property that gives the owner the right to exclude others from making, using, selling, and importing an invention for a certain period, typically 20 years from the date of filing. Patents are granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) after a thorough examination process[3].

Patent Scope

The scope of a patent is defined by its claims, which are the specific descriptions of the invention for which the patentee seeks protection. The scope determines what is protected and what is not. A broader scope can provide more extensive protection but may also face challenges of validity and infringement[3].

Claim Construction

Claim construction is the process of interpreting the language of the claims to determine their scope. This is a critical step in patent litigation, as it defines what the patent covers and what would constitute infringement. Claim construction is a question of law, reviewed de novo on appeal, and involves analyzing the claim language, the specification, and the prosecution history of the patent[2].

Types of Claims

Patents typically include two types of claims: independent and dependent claims. Independent claims stand alone and define the invention without reference to other claims. Dependent claims, on the other hand, refer back to and further limit an independent claim. The number and length of independent claims can be metrics for measuring patent scope, with narrower claims often associated with a higher probability of grant and a shorter examination process[3].

Patent Examination Process

The examination process involves the USPTO reviewing the patent application to ensure that the invention is novel, non-obvious, and adequately described. During this process, the scope of the patent claims may be narrowed to address issues of prior art or clarity. The examination process tends to narrow the scope of patent claims in terms of both claim length and claim count, especially when the duration of examination is longer[3].

Patent Landscape

The patent landscape refers to the overall environment in which a patent exists, including other related patents, prior art, and industry trends. Analyzing the patent landscape can help in understanding the competitive position of a patent and identifying potential areas for innovation or litigation.

Case Study: Pearl's Dental AI Patent

To illustrate the importance of patent scope and claims, consider Pearl's recent patent for dental practice data analysis AI technology. This patent, U.S. Patent No. 11,776,677, covers machine learning techniques used to analyze data associated with dental practices to identify missed treatment opportunities and provider performance metrics. The patent highlights the significance of precise claim construction and the technological advantages it provides in the dental AI sector[1].

Key Components of Patent Analysis

Claim Language

The language used in the claims is crucial. It must be clear and specific enough to inform those skilled in the field what is covered by the patent. Ambiguous or overly broad claims can lead to issues of validity and infringement[2].

Specification and Prosecution History

The specification and prosecution history provide context to the claims. They help in understanding the inventor's intent and any limitations or clarifications made during the examination process[2].

Prior Art

Prior art refers to existing knowledge and inventions in the field. A patent must be novel and non-obvious over the prior art to be granted. Analyzing prior art is essential in determining the scope and validity of a patent[3].

Industry Trends and Competitors

Understanding the broader industry trends and the competitive landscape can help in assessing the strategic value of a patent. This includes identifying potential infringers, licensing opportunities, and areas for further innovation.

Illustrative Statistics

  • The examination process tends to narrow the scope of patent claims, with narrower claims at publication associated with a higher probability of grant and a shorter examination process[3].
  • In the case of strength training equipment patents, applications increased substantially after 1961, with a peak of 54 in 1979, indicating a growing interest in innovation in this field[4].

Quotes from Industry Experts

  • "Practice Intelligence equips dental practices around the world with clinical performance insights essential for increasing operational efficiency and boosting practice growth," said Ophir Tanz, Founder and CEO of Pearl. This highlights the practical impact of well-defined patent claims in real-world applications[1].

Highlight: Claim Construction Challenges

"Claim construction is a question of law and receives de novo review on appeal." This emphasizes the legal significance of claim construction and the need for precise interpretation to avoid disputes and litigation[2].

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Scope and Claims: The scope of a patent is defined by its claims, which must be clear, specific, and novel over prior art.
  • Claim Construction: Claim construction is a critical legal process that determines the scope of protection.
  • Patent Examination: The examination process can narrow the scope of claims to ensure validity and clarity.
  • Industry Landscape: Understanding the broader industry trends and competitive landscape is crucial for assessing the value and strategic implications of a patent.
  • Innovation and Litigation: Well-defined patent claims can drive innovation and protect against infringement, while ambiguous claims can lead to litigation.

FAQs

  1. What is the significance of claim construction in patent law? Claim construction is crucial as it determines the scope of protection for a patent. It is a legal process that interprets the language of the claims to define what the patent covers and what would constitute infringement.

  2. How does the patent examination process affect the scope of patent claims? The patent examination process tends to narrow the scope of patent claims to address issues of prior art, clarity, and validity. Narrower claims at publication are associated with a higher probability of grant and a shorter examination process.

  3. What metrics can be used to measure patent scope? Metrics such as independent claim length and independent claim count can be used to measure patent scope. These metrics have explanatory power for several correlates of patent scope, including patent maintenance payments and forward citations.

  4. Why is understanding the patent landscape important? Understanding the patent landscape helps in assessing the competitive position of a patent, identifying potential areas for innovation, and recognizing potential infringers or licensing opportunities.

  5. How can ambiguous or overly broad claims affect a patent? Ambiguous or overly broad claims can lead to issues of validity and infringement. They may result in litigation and challenges to the patent's enforceability.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,522,778

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Optinose Us Inc XHANCE fluticasone propionate SPRAY, METERED;NASAL 209022-001 Sep 18, 2017 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe Y ⤷  Subscribe
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 8,522,778

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom0104692.9Feb 26, 2001
PCT/IB2002/001546Feb 26, 2002

International Family Members for US Patent 8,522,778

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 285810 ⤷  Subscribe
Austria 422923 ⤷  Subscribe
Austria 427130 ⤷  Subscribe
Austria 487506 ⤷  Subscribe
Austria 506983 ⤷  Subscribe
Austria 514445 ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.