You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 26, 2024

Details for Patent: 8,529,882


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,529,882
Title:Peptidomimetic protease inhibitors
Abstract: The present invention relates to peptidomimetic compounds useful as protease inhibitors, particularly as serine protease inhibitors and more particularly as hepatitis C NS3 protease inhibitors; intermediates thereto; their preparation including novel stereoselective processes to intermediates. The invention is also directed to pharmaceutical compositions and to methods for using the compounds for inhibiting HCV protease or treating a patient suffering from an HCV infection or physiological condition related to the infection. Also provided are pharmaceutical combinations comprising, in addition to one or more HCV serine protease inhibitors, one or more interferons exhibiting anti-HCV activity and/or one or more compounds having anti HCV activity and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, and methods for treating or preventing a HCV infection in a patient using the compositions. The present invention is also directed to a kit or pharmaceutical pack for treating or preventing HCV infection in a patient.
Inventor(s): Babine; Robert Edward (Franklin, MA), Chen; Shu Hui (Carmel, IN), Collado; Ivan (Madrid, ES), Garcia-Paredes; Cristina (Madrid, ES), Glass; John Irvin (Indianapolis, IN), Jin; Ling (Carmel, IN), Lamar; Jason Eric (Indianapolis, IN), Parker, III; Raymond Samuel (Doylestown, PA), Snyder; Nancy June (Lizton, IN), Sun; Xicheng David (Superior, CO), Guo; Deqi (Carmel, IN), Yip; Yvonne Yee Mai (Indianapolis, IN), Wang; Q. May (Indianapolis, IN), Victor; Frantz (Indianapolis, IN), Tebbe; Mark Joseph (Hamburg, DE), Perni; Robert B. (Marlborough, MA), Farmer; Luc (Montreal, CA)
Assignee: Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (Cambridge, MA)
Application Number:13/541,436
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of U.S. Patents: A Detailed Analysis

Introduction

Patents are a cornerstone of innovation, providing inventors and companies with the exclusive rights to their inventions for a specified period. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is the agency responsible for granting these patents. This article delves into the scope and claims of U.S. patents, using the example of U.S. Patent 8,529,882 to illustrate key concepts.

The Role of the USPTO

The USPTO is the primary agency for granting U.S. patents and registering trademarks. It plays a crucial role in the innovation ecosystem by ensuring that inventors have a clear path to protecting their intellectual property[2].

Patent Types and Classification

The USPTO grants various types of patents, with utility patents being the most common. These patents are classified under the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) classification, which includes 35 International Patent Classification (IPC) technical fields. For instance, patents can be grouped into broad categories such as electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, and chemistry[1].

Patent Claims

Patent claims define the scope of the invention and are crucial for determining the patent's validity and enforceability. The Patent Claims Research Dataset by the USPTO provides detailed information on claims from U.S. patents granted between 1976 and 2014. This dataset includes claim-level statistics and document-level statistics, offering insights into the scope and complexity of patent claims[3].

Example: U.S. Patent 8,529,882

To illustrate the concept of patent claims, let's consider U.S. Patent 8,529,882, though the specific details of this patent are not provided here. Generally, a patent like this would include several key components:

Abstract and Background

The abstract provides a brief summary of the invention, while the background section discusses the prior art and the problems the invention solves.

Detailed Description

This section provides a detailed explanation of the invention, including drawings and diagrams. It describes how the invention works and its various embodiments.

Claims

The claims section is where the inventor defines the scope of the invention. Claims are typically written in a specific format and must be clear, concise, and supported by the description. Here is an example of how claims might be structured:

Claim 1: A method for [brief description of the method], comprising:
    - Step 1: [first step of the method]
    - Step 2: [second step of the method]
    - Step 3: [third step of the method]

Claim 2: The method of claim 1, wherein [additional limitation or feature].

Claim 3: An apparatus for [brief description of the apparatus], comprising:
    - Component 1: [first component of the apparatus]
    - Component 2: [second component of the apparatus]

Dependent and Independent Claims

Claims can be either independent or dependent. Independent claims stand alone and define the invention without reference to other claims. Dependent claims, on the other hand, refer back to an independent claim and add additional limitations or features.

Patent Scope Measurements

The scope of a patent is a critical aspect that determines its breadth and enforceability. The USPTO has developed measures to quantify patent scope, including the number of claims, the complexity of claims, and the breadth of the claims. These measurements help in understanding the overall impact of the patent on the market and its potential for litigation[3].

Trends in Patent Applications and Grants

The number of patent applications and grants has been increasing over the years, with a significant rise in electrical engineering and information and communication technologies (ICT) patents. In 2018, the USPTO awarded 309,000 utility patents, with businesses receiving the majority of these patents[1].

Challenges and Considerations

Probability of Receiving a Patent

The probability of receiving a patent varies based on several factors, including the technology field, the size of the entity filing the patent, and the quality of the application. Studies have shown that the outcome of patent applications can be influenced by these factors, with larger entities generally having a higher success rate[4].

Small Claims Patent Court

There has been ongoing discussion about the need for a small claims patent court to address the high costs and complexities associated with patent litigation. The Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) has conducted studies and gathered public comments on this issue, highlighting the need for a more accessible and cost-effective system for small inventors and businesses[5].

Impact on Innovation

Patents play a vital role in driving innovation by providing inventors with the incentive to invest in research and development. The clarity and scope of patent claims are essential for ensuring that inventors can protect their inventions without overly broad claims that might stifle innovation.

Legal and Policy Considerations

The legal and policy framework surrounding patents is complex and evolving. Changes in patent laws and regulations can significantly impact the patent landscape. For instance, the introduction of a small claims patent court could make it easier for smaller entities to enforce their patent rights[5].

Stakeholder Engagement

Stakeholder engagement is crucial in shaping the patent landscape. The USPTO and other regulatory bodies often seek input from a wide range of stakeholders, including inventors, businesses, and legal experts, to ensure that the patent system remains effective and fair[5].

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Claims: Define the scope of the invention and are critical for determining the patent's validity and enforceability.
  • Patent Scope Measurements: Quantify the breadth and complexity of patent claims.
  • Trends in Patent Applications: Electrical engineering and ICT patents have seen significant growth.
  • Challenges and Considerations: The probability of receiving a patent varies, and there is a need for a more accessible patent litigation system.
  • Impact on Innovation: Patents drive innovation by providing inventors with the incentive to invest in R&D.
  • Legal and Policy Considerations: The patent landscape is influenced by legal and policy changes.

FAQs

What is the role of the USPTO in the patent process?

The USPTO is responsible for granting U.S. patents and registering trademarks, ensuring that inventors have a clear path to protecting their intellectual property.

How are patent claims classified?

Patent claims are classified under the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) classification, which includes 35 International Patent Classification (IPC) technical fields.

What determines the scope of a patent?

The scope of a patent is determined by the claims, which define the invention and its limitations. Measures such as the number of claims, complexity, and breadth also quantify the patent scope.

Why is there a discussion about a small claims patent court?

The discussion is driven by the need for a more accessible and cost-effective system for small inventors and businesses to enforce their patent rights, given the high costs and complexities associated with current patent litigation.

How do trends in patent applications impact innovation?

Trends in patent applications, particularly the rise in electrical engineering and ICT patents, reflect the areas where innovation is most active and can influence future technological developments.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,529,882

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 8,529,882

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 1320540 ⤷  Subscribe C300518 Netherlands ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 1320540 ⤷  Subscribe PA2012003,C1320540 Lithuania ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 1320540 ⤷  Subscribe PA2012003 Lithuania ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 1320540 ⤷  Subscribe CA 2012 00007 Denmark ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 1320540 ⤷  Subscribe 91960 Luxembourg ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 1320540 ⤷  Subscribe 1290007-2 Sweden ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 1320540 ⤷  Subscribe 12C0018 France ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.