You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 8,627,816


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,627,816
Title:Medicament delivery device for administration of opioid antagonists including formulations for naloxone
Abstract: Medicament delivery devices for administration of opioid antagonists are described herein. In some embodiments, an apparatus includes a housing, a medicament container disposed within the housing and an energy storage member disposed within the housing. The medicament container is filled with a naloxone composition that includes naloxone or salts thereof, a tonicity-adjusting agent, and a pH adjusting agent, whereby the osmolality of the naloxone composition ranges from about 250-350 mOsm and the pH ranges from about 3-5. The energy storage member is configured to produce a force to deliver the naloxone composition.
Inventor(s): Edwards; Eric S. (Midlothian, VA), Edwards; Evan T. (Gordonsville, VA), Licata; Mark J. (Doswell, VA), Blondino; Frank E. (Henrico, VA)
Assignee: Intelliject, Inc. (Richmond, VA)
Application Number:13/036,720
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Device; Delivery;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 8,627,816

Introduction

Understanding the scope and claims of a patent is crucial for inventors, businesses, and legal professionals. This analysis will delve into the specifics of United States Patent 8,627,816, exploring its claims, scope, and the broader patent landscape.

Patent Overview

United States Patent 8,627,816, though not directly provided in the sources, can be analyzed using general patent analysis techniques and tools available through the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and other patent databases.

Locating the Patent

To begin, one would typically search for the patent on the USPTO website using the patent number. The USPTO Public Search Facility and online databases such as the Patent Full-Text and Image Database (PatFT) provide access to patent documents, including issued patents and published applications[1].

Reading the Patent Document

The patent document for 8,627,816 would include several key sections:

  • Abstract: A brief summary of the invention.
  • Background of the Invention: Context and prior art related to the invention.
  • Summary of the Invention: A concise description of the invention.
  • Detailed Description of the Invention: An in-depth explanation of the invention, including drawings and figures.
  • Claims: The legal definition of the invention, specifying what is protected by the patent.

Analyzing the Claims

The claims section is the most critical part of a patent document as it defines the scope of protection. Here are some steps to analyze the claims:

Independent and Dependent Claims

  • Independent Claims: These claims stand alone and define the invention without reference to other claims. They are typically broader in scope.
  • Dependent Claims: These claims refer back to and further limit the independent claims. They are narrower in scope and often provide additional details or specific embodiments of the invention.

Claim Construction

  • Each claim should be carefully read to understand what is being claimed. This involves identifying the key elements and limitations of the claim.
  • The relationship between independent and dependent claims needs to be understood to see how the broader claims are narrowed down by the dependent claims.

Scope of the Patent

The scope of a patent is determined by the claims. Here are some key points to consider:

Claim Language

  • The language used in the claims is precise and legalistic. Words and phrases have specific meanings that can affect the scope of protection.
  • Terms like "comprising," "consisting of," and "including" can have different implications on the scope of the claims.

Prior Art and Novelty

  • The patent must be novel and non-obvious over the prior art. The background and summary sections often discuss prior art and how the current invention improves upon it.
  • The claims must be distinguishable from prior art to ensure the patent is valid.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Understanding the broader patent landscape involves looking at related patents and applications:

Patent Family

  • Using tools like the Global Dossier, you can see the patent family for a specific application, including all related applications filed at participating IP Offices[1].

Citation Data

  • The Common Citation Document (CCD) consolidates prior art cited by all participating offices for the family members of a patent application, helping to visualize the search results on a single page[1].

Competitor Patents

  • Analyzing patents held by competitors can provide insights into the competitive landscape and potential areas of innovation.
  • Databases like PatentsView offer detailed patent research data sets that can be used to identify trends and patterns in patent filings[4].

Statistical Analysis

For a deeper analysis, statistical data can be useful:

Patent Claims Research Dataset

  • The USPTO provides datasets like the Patent Claims Research Dataset, which contains detailed information on claims from U.S. patents and applications. This can help in understanding claim-level statistics and document-level statistics[3].

Citation Analysis

  • Analyzing citations made to and by the patent can provide insights into its impact and relevance within the field. Tools like PatentsView offer data on citations made to U.S. patent applications and granted patents[4].

Practical Applications

Understanding the scope and claims of a patent has several practical applications:

Licensing and Collaboration

  • Knowing the exact scope of protection can help in negotiating licensing agreements or collaborations.
  • It ensures that any agreements do not infringe on the protected claims.

Infringement Analysis

  • Conducting an infringement analysis involves comparing the claims of the patent with the features of an accused product or process.
  • This is crucial for enforcing patent rights and defending against infringement claims.

Innovation and R&D

  • Analyzing the patent landscape helps in identifying gaps in current technology and areas for future innovation.
  • It guides R&D efforts to ensure that new inventions are novel and non-obvious over existing patents.

Key Takeaways

  • Claims Analysis: The claims section is the heart of a patent document, defining the scope of protection.
  • Scope Determination: The scope is influenced by claim language, prior art, and novelty.
  • Patent Landscape: Understanding related patents and applications is crucial for competitive analysis and innovation.
  • Statistical Insights: Using datasets and citation analysis can provide deeper insights into the patent’s impact and relevance.

FAQs

Q: How do I find the full text of a patent on the USPTO website? A: You can search for the patent using the patent number on the USPTO Public Search Facility or through the Patent Full-Text and Image Database (PatFT)[1].

Q: What is the difference between independent and dependent claims? A: Independent claims stand alone and define the invention broadly, while dependent claims refer back to and further limit the independent claims, narrowing down the scope[1].

Q: How can I analyze the patent landscape for a specific patent? A: Use tools like the Global Dossier and Common Citation Document (CCD) to see related applications and prior art citations. Databases like PatentsView can also provide detailed research data sets[1][4].

Q: What statistical data can I use to analyze patent claims? A: The USPTO’s Patent Claims Research Dataset and PatentsView databases offer detailed statistical data on claims and citations[3][4].

Q: Why is it important to understand the scope of a patent? A: Understanding the scope helps in licensing, infringement analysis, and guiding R&D efforts to ensure novelty and non-obviousness over existing patents.

Sources

  1. USPTO - Search for patents: https://www.uspto.gov/patents/search
  2. USA.gov - U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO): https://www.usa.gov/agencies/u-s-patent-and-trademark-office
  3. USPTO - Patent Claims Research Dataset: https://www.uspto.gov/ip-policy/economic-research/research-datasets/patent-claims-research-dataset
  4. PatentsView - Data Download Tables: https://patentsview.org/download/data-download-tables

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,627,816

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Kaleo Inc EVZIO naloxone hydrochloride SOLUTION;INTRAMUSCULAR, SUBCUTANEOUS 205787-001 Apr 3, 2014 DISCN Yes No 8,627,816 ⤷  Subscribe Y ⤷  Subscribe
Kaleo Inc EVZIO (AUTOINJECTOR) naloxone hydrochloride SOLUTION;INTRAMUSCULAR, SUBCUTANEOUS 209862-001 Oct 19, 2016 DISCN Yes No 8,627,816 ⤷  Subscribe Y ⤷  Subscribe
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 8,627,816

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2011218756 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 2012211307 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 2012211320 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 2015255197 ⤷  Subscribe
Brazil 112013018807 ⤷  Subscribe
Brazil 112013018917 ⤷  Subscribe
Canada 2825600 ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.