You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 8,642,608


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,642,608
Title:Quinazoline derivatives as VEGF inhibitors
Abstract: The invention relates to quinazoline derivatives of formula (I), wherein m is an integer from 1 to 3; R.sup.1 represents halogeno or C.sub.1-3alkyl; X.sup.1 represents --O--; R.sup.2 is selected from one of the following three groups: 1) C.sub.1-5alkylR.sup.3 (wherein R.sup.3 is piperidinyl-4-yl which may bear one or two substituents selected from hydroxy, halogeno, C.sub.1-4alkyl, C.sub.1-4hydroxyalkyl and C.sub.1-4alkoxy; 2) C.sub.2-5alkenylR.sup.3 (wherein R.sup.3 is as defined hereinbefore); 3) C.sub.2-5alkynylR.sup.3 (wherein R.sup.3 is as defined hereinbefore); and wherein any alkyl, alkenyl or alkynyl group may bear one or more substituents selected from hydroxy, halogeno and amino; and salts thereof; processes for their preparation, pharmaceutical compositions containing a compound of formula (I) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof as active ingredient. The compounds of formula (I) and the pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof inhibit the effects of VEGF, a property of value in the treatment of a number of disease states including cancer and rheumatoid arthritis. ##STR00001##
Inventor(s): Thomas; Andrew Peter (Macclesfield, GB), Stokes; Elaine Sophie Elizabeth (Macclesfield, GB), Hennequin; Laurent Francois Andre (Reims Cedex, FR)
Assignee: AstraZeneca AB (Sodertalje, SE)
Application Number:12/761,105
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

United States Patent 8,642,608: A Detailed Analysis of Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

The United States Patent 8,642,608, titled "Quinazoline Derivatives as VEGF Inhibitors," was granted to AstraZeneca AB on February 4, 2014. This patent is significant in the pharmaceutical industry, particularly in the field of cancer treatment, as it pertains to compounds that inhibit the VEGF (Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor) receptor tyrosine kinase. Here, we will delve into the scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape surrounding this invention.

Inventors and Assignee

The patent was invented by Andrew Peter Thomas, Elaine Sophie Elizabeth Stokes, and Laurent Francois Andre Hennequin, with AstraZeneca AB as the assignee. This indicates that the research and development were likely conducted within AstraZeneca's facilities, highlighting the company's commitment to innovative pharmaceutical solutions[4].

Patent Claims

The patent claims are a critical component of any patent, as they define the scope of protection granted to the inventor. For US Patent 8,642,608, the claims are centered around specific quinazoline derivatives and their use as VEGF inhibitors.

Independent Claims

The independent claims are the broadest claims in the patent and set the foundation for the invention. These claims typically describe the general structure of the compounds and their therapeutic use. For example, Claim 1 might describe a quinazoline derivative with specific substituents and its use in inhibiting VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase activity[4].

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow down the scope of the independent claims by adding additional limitations. These claims often specify particular aspects of the compounds, such as specific substituents, dosages, or methods of administration. Dependent claims help to ensure that the patent protection is tailored to the specific innovations made by the inventors.

Patent Scope and Claim Clarity

The scope of a patent is crucial in determining its validity and enforceability. For US Patent 8,642,608, the scope is defined by the claims and the description provided in the patent specification.

Claim Length and Count

Research has shown that narrower claims, often indicated by shorter claim lengths and fewer claim counts, are associated with a higher probability of grant and a shorter examination process. This suggests that the claims in US Patent 8,642,608 were likely refined during the examination process to ensure clarity and specificity[3].

Patent Quality Concerns

Patent quality, including claim clarity and scope, has been a subject of debate. Broad and unclear claims can impede innovation by increasing licensing and litigation costs. However, the claims in US Patent 8,642,608 appear to be well-defined, indicating a high level of patent quality[3].

Therapeutic Use and Significance

The compounds described in US Patent 8,642,608 are designed to inhibit VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase, which is a key target in cancer therapy. VEGF is involved in angiogenesis, the process of forming new blood vessels, which is crucial for tumor growth. By inhibiting VEGF, these compounds can potentially slow down or stop the growth of tumors, making them valuable in the treatment of various cancers.

Patent Expiration and Generic Launch

Patents have a limited lifespan, and their expiration can lead to the entry of generic versions of the drug into the market. For US Patent 8,642,608, the maintenance fees have been regularly paid, indicating that the patent is still in force. However, as patents expire, generic manufacturers can file Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs) to market generic versions of the drug, potentially reducing the market share of the original patent holder[5].

Impact on Patent Landscape

The issuance of US Patent 8,642,608 has contributed to the rich patent landscape in the field of cancer therapeutics. It reflects the ongoing efforts by pharmaceutical companies to develop innovative treatments for cancer.

Competition and Innovation

The presence of this patent, along with others in the same field, drives competition and innovation. Other companies may be incentivized to develop alternative VEGF inhibitors or explore different therapeutic targets, leading to a broader range of treatment options for patients.

Licensing and Litigation

Patents like US 8,642,608 can be subject to licensing agreements and litigation. Licensing allows other companies to use the patented technology, while litigation can arise if there are disputes over patent infringement or validity. The clarity and specificity of the claims in this patent help in navigating these legal complexities.

Regulatory and Judicial Considerations

The patentability of inventions, including those related to pharmaceuticals, is subject to regulatory and judicial scrutiny.

Patent Eligibility

The Supreme Court and the Federal Circuit have established guidelines for determining patent eligibility, particularly for abstract ideas and laws of nature. While mathematical formulas or natural phenomena are not patentable, their application in a specific technological context can be. The claims in US Patent 8,642,608 are specific to the application of quinazoline derivatives as VEGF inhibitors, making them patent-eligible under these guidelines[2].

Inventorship and AI-Assisted Inventions

Recent guidance from the USPTO clarifies that while AI systems can assist in the inventive process, only natural persons can be named as inventors. This ensures that patents continue to incentivize and reward human ingenuity, even in cases where AI tools are used[1].

Key Takeaways

  • Specific Claims: The patent claims are specific to quinazoline derivatives and their use as VEGF inhibitors.
  • Therapeutic Significance: The compounds are valuable in cancer therapy by inhibiting VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase.
  • Patent Scope and Clarity: The claims are well-defined, ensuring a high level of patent quality.
  • Patent Expiration: Regular maintenance fees have been paid, but the patent will eventually expire, allowing for generic versions.
  • Impact on Patent Landscape: The patent contributes to the competitive and innovative environment in cancer therapeutics.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main subject of US Patent 8,642,608?

The main subject of US Patent 8,642,608 is quinazoline derivatives and their use as VEGF inhibitors in cancer therapy.

Who are the inventors of US Patent 8,642,608?

The inventors are Andrew Peter Thomas, Elaine Sophie Elizabeth Stokes, and Laurent Francois Andre Hennequin.

What is the significance of VEGF inhibition in cancer treatment?

VEGF inhibition is significant because it targets angiogenesis, the process of forming new blood vessels that tumors need to grow.

When does US Patent 8,642,608 expire?

The exact expiration date is not specified in the provided sources, but it will be 20 years from the earliest priority date, assuming all maintenance fees are paid.

Can AI systems be named as inventors in patent applications?

No, according to recent USPTO guidance, only natural persons can be named as inventors, even if AI systems assist in the inventive process[1].

Cited Sources

  1. Federal Register, Volume 89 Issue 30 - "Executive Order on the Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence"[1].
  2. Thales Visionix Inc. v. US - Federal Circuit decision on patent eligibility[2].
  3. Patent Claims and Patent Scope - Hoover Institution paper on measuring patent scope[3].
  4. United States Patent 8,642,608 - Quinazoline Derivatives as VEGF Inhibitors[4].
  5. Caprelsa patent expiration - Pharsight data on patent maintenance fees and expiration[5].

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,642,608

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 8,642,608

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
99402759Nov 5, 1999
99402877Nov 19, 1999

International Family Members for US Patent 8,642,608

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 1244647 ⤷  Subscribe C300543 Netherlands ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 1244647 ⤷  Subscribe PA2012015 Lithuania ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 1244647 ⤷  Subscribe CA 2012 00032 Denmark ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 1244647 ⤷  Subscribe 92057 Luxembourg ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 1244647 ⤷  Subscribe 2012/029 Ireland ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 1244647 ⤷  Subscribe 1290028-8 Sweden ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.