You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 27, 2024

Details for Patent: 8,685,442


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,685,442
Title:Capsules containing high doses of levodopa for pulmonary use
Abstract: The present invention provides a capsule containing an inhalable powder composition wherein the composition comprises about 75% by weight or more levodopa, dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC) and a salt characterized by a working density of less than about 100 g/L. The invention further provides a capsule containing an inhalable powder composition wherein the composition comprises about 75% by weight or more levodopa, dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC) and a salt characterized by a working density of less than about 100 g/L wherein the capsule material comprises hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC) and titanium dioxide.
Inventor(s): Batycky; Richard P. (Newton, MA), Lipp; Michael M. (Framingham, MA), Kamerkar; Abhijit (Boston, MA), Penachio; Ernest D. (Haverhill, MA), Kee; Kevin D. (Somerville, MA)
Assignee: Civitas Therapeutics, Inc. (Chelsea, MA)
Application Number:13/945,160
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Device; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of U.S. Patents: A Detailed Analysis

Introduction

Patents are a crucial component of innovation, protecting intellectual property and encouraging technological advancement. This article delves into the scope and claims of U.S. patents, using the example of U.S. Patent 8,685,442 to illustrate key concepts and trends in the patent landscape.

The Importance of Patents

Patents are essential for inventors and businesses, providing exclusive rights to make, use, and sell an invention for a specified period. This protection incentivizes innovation by allowing inventors to recoup their investment in research and development[1].

Patent Landscape in the United States

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is responsible for granting patents in the United States. In 2018, the USPTO awarded 309,000 utility patents, with businesses receiving the majority (85%) of these patents[1].

Technology Areas and Patent Trends

Patents are classified into various technology areas, which help in analyzing trends in patenting focus over time. The USPTO uses the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) classification system, which includes 35 technical fields. For instance, electrical and mechanical engineering patents made up about 60% of USPTO patents in 2018, with a significant increase in electrical engineering patents driven by information and communication technologies (ICT)[1].

Patent Claims and Scope

What are Patent Claims?

Patent claims define the scope of the invention and are critical in determining the boundaries of the patent's protection. The Patent Claims Research Dataset by the USPTO provides detailed information on claims from U.S. patents granted between 1976 and 2014, including claim-level statistics and document-level statistics[3].

Analyzing Patent Scope

The scope of a patent is measured by the breadth and depth of its claims. Research by the USPTO has developed measures of patent scope, including the number of claims, the dependency between claims, and the technological fields covered. These measures help in understanding the complexity and breadth of a patent's protection[3].

Case Study: U.S. Patent 8,685,442

Background

To illustrate the concepts discussed, let's consider U.S. Patent 8,685,442. While the specific details of this patent are not provided in the sources, we can apply general principles to understand its scope and claims.

Claim Structure

A typical patent includes multiple claims, each describing a different aspect of the invention. These claims can be independent or dependent, with dependent claims building upon independent claims. The structure and number of claims can significantly impact the patent's scope and enforceability[3].

Technological Field

Patents are classified into specific technological fields. For example, if U.S. Patent 8,685,442 falls under the electrical engineering field, it would be part of a broader category that includes computer technology and digital communication, areas that have seen significant growth in recent years[1].

Enforcement and Infringement

Patent enforcement is crucial for protecting the rights of inventors. Cases like Provisur Technologies, Inc. v. Weber, Inc. highlight the importance of proving infringement and willfulness. In such cases, the court examines whether the alleged infringer knew of the patent and had a specific intent to infringe, which is necessary but not sufficient for a finding of willfulness[2].

Trends in Patent Applications and Grants

Application Characteristics

The probability of receiving a U.S. patent varies based on several factors, including the origin of the application (U.S. or foreign), the size of the entity filing the application, and the technological field. For instance, applications from large entities and those in the electrical and electronics field may have different success rates compared to small entities or other fields[4].

Patent Application Outcomes

Research on patent applications filed between 1996 and 2005 shows that the outcome of these applications can take several years to determine. Factors such as the number of claims, the complexity of the technology, and the quality of the application can influence the likelihood of a patent being granted[4].

The Need for a Small Claims Patent Court

Current Challenges

The current patent litigation system can be costly and time-consuming, making it inaccessible to many small inventors and businesses. There is an ongoing discussion about the need for a small claims patent court to address these issues and provide a more feasible and cost-effective option for resolving patent disputes[5].

Proposed Solutions

The Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) has conducted a study on the feasibility of a small claims patent court. This study involves input from a wide range of stakeholders, including academic experts, legal practitioners, and the public. The aim is to design a system that is more accessible and efficient for small entities[5].

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Protection: Patents are vital for protecting intellectual property and encouraging innovation.
  • Technology Areas: Patents are classified into various technological fields, with electrical and mechanical engineering being prominent areas.
  • Claim Structure: The scope of a patent is defined by its claims, which can be independent or dependent.
  • Enforcement: Proving infringement and willfulness is crucial in patent enforcement cases.
  • Trends in Applications: The success rate of patent applications varies based on factors like the origin of the application and the technological field.
  • Small Claims Court: There is a growing need for a small claims patent court to make patent litigation more accessible to small inventors and businesses.

FAQs

What is the primary purpose of a patent?

The primary purpose of a patent is to provide exclusive rights to the inventor to make, use, and sell an invention for a specified period, thereby protecting their intellectual property.

How are patents classified?

Patents are classified into various technological fields using the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) classification system, which includes 35 technical fields.

What determines the scope of a patent?

The scope of a patent is determined by its claims, which define the boundaries of the invention. The number of claims, their dependency, and the technological fields covered are key factors.

Why is patent enforcement important?

Patent enforcement is crucial for protecting the rights of inventors by preventing unauthorized use of their inventions and ensuring they can recoup their investment in research and development.

What is the proposed solution for making patent litigation more accessible?

The proposed solution is the establishment of a small claims patent court, which would provide a more feasible and cost-effective option for resolving patent disputes, especially for small inventors and businesses.

How long does it take to determine the outcome of a patent application?

The outcome of a patent application can take several years to determine, typically ranging from four to five years after the filing date.

Sources

  1. National Science Foundation. Invention: U.S. and Comparative Global Trends. January 15, 2020.
  2. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Provisur Technologies, Inc. v. Weber, Inc. October 2, 2024.
  3. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Patent Claims Research Dataset. August 28, 2017.
  4. Carley, Michael, Hegde, Deepak, and Marco, Alan C. What Is the Probability of Receiving a US Patent? Available at SSRN.
  5. Administrative Conference of the United States. U.S. Patent Small Claims Court. April 28, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,685,442

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Merz Pharms INBRIJA levodopa POWDER;INHALATION 209184-001 Dec 21, 2018 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe Y ⤷  Subscribe
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 8,685,442

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2013342246 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 2013342247 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 2013342248 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 2017279626 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 2018204674 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 2018222983 ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.