You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 8,835,505


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,835,505
Title:Ready-to-use co-solvents pharmaceutical composition in modified flexible plastic container
Abstract: A ready-to-use injectable, co-solvents (ternary mixture) pharmaceutical composition for the treatment of cardiac conditions and diagnosis applications, comprising methyl-3-[4-(2-hydroxy-3-isopropylamino)propoxy]phenylpropionate hydrochloride (Esmolol hydrochloride), a buffering agent, ethanol and propylene glycol. The ready-to-use injectable, co-solvents (ternary mixture) pharmaceutical composition is capable of being stored in a modified flexible plastic container that may be heat-sterilized without deformation and/or without having the integrity of the closure system being compromised. A method for the manufacture of the ready-to-use injectable, co-solvents (ternary mixture) pharmaceutical composition is also disclosed.
Inventor(s): Owoo; George (Lindenhurst, IL), Castagna; Erica (Tirano, IT)
Assignee: Welgrace Research Group (Lindenhurst, IL) HQ Specialty Pharma Corporation (Paramus, NJ)
Application Number:13/840,153
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Formulation; Compound; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 8,835,505: A Comprehensive Guide

Introduction

When analyzing a patent, understanding its scope and claims is crucial for determining its validity, enforceability, and the protection it offers. This article will delve into the details of United States Patent 8,835,505, exploring its claims, the patent landscape, and the tools and methods used in such analyses.

Understanding Patent Claims

Patent claims are the most critical part of a patent application, as they define the scope of the invention and what is protected by the patent. Claims are typically categorized into independent and dependent claims, with independent claims standing alone and dependent claims referring back to one or more of the independent claims[3].

Patent 8,835,505 Overview

To analyze the scope and claims of United States Patent 8,835,505, one must first identify the type of patent (e.g., utility, design, plant) and the technology it pertains to. Here, we assume it is a utility patent, which is the most common type.

Claim Structure

  • Independent Claims: These claims define the broadest scope of the invention. They are self-contained and do not refer to any other claims.
  • Dependent Claims: These claims narrow down the scope of the invention by adding additional limitations to the independent claims.

Claim Analysis

Each claim in the patent should be analyzed to understand what specific aspects of the invention are protected. This involves:

  • Claim Coverage Matrix: This tool helps in categorizing patents by claims and scope concepts, making it easier to identify which claims cover specific technologies or products[3].
  • Claim Charts: These charts are generated using software like ClaimScape® and help in visually representing the coverage of each claim. This is particularly useful for reviewing patent coverage with engineers, scientists, and management[3].

Patent Landscape Analysis

Understanding the patent landscape involves identifying other patents that may be relevant to the invention, including prior art, related patents, and potential competitors.

Tools for Patent Landscape Analysis

  • Patent Public Search: This tool, provided by the USPTO, offers enhanced access to prior art and allows users to search through a vast database of patents and published patent applications[1].
  • Global Dossier: This service provides access to the file histories of related applications from participating IP Offices, helping users to see the patent family for a specific application and related citation data[1].
  • Common Citation Document (CCD): This application consolidates prior art cited by all participating offices for the family members of a patent application, making it easier to visualize search results on a single page[1].

Identifying Prior Art and Related Patents

Prior art is any evidence that your invention was already known or used by others before your filing date. Identifying prior art is crucial for determining the novelty and non-obviousness of your invention.

  • Electronic Official Gazette: This resource allows users to browse through issued patents for the current week, categorized by classification or type of patent[1].
  • Publication Site for Issued and Published Sequences (PSIPS): For patents involving sequences, this site provides access to sequence listings and other mega items for granted US patents or published US patent applications[1].

Patent Assignment and Ownership

Understanding who owns the patent and any changes in ownership is important for licensing, litigation, and other business decisions.

  • Patent Assignment Search: This tool allows users to search for patent assignments and changes in ownership, providing clarity on the current ownership status of the patent[1].

Legal Considerations

Obviousness-Type Double Patenting (ODP)

ODP is a doctrine that prevents an inventor from securing a second, later-expiring patent for an invention covered by a patent that was filed at the same time but has a different patent term due to a grant of Patent Term Adjustment (PTA)[4].

Patent Term Adjustment (PTA)

PTA is granted for USPTO delays during prosecution. Understanding how PTA affects the expiration date of the patent is crucial, especially in cases where ODP is a concern[4].

Practical Applications and Strategies

Using Patent Analytics

Patent analytics can help companies understand which patents and claims are actively protecting their intellectual property and where gaps or opportunities exist. This involves tracking patents by claims and scope concepts, and using tools like Claim Coverage Matrix and Claim Charts[3].

Engaging with Experts

Consulting with patent attorneys, engineers, and other experts can provide valuable insights into the patent landscape and help in making informed decisions about patent strategy.

Case Studies and Examples

Real-world examples and case studies can provide practical insights into how patent claims and landscapes are analyzed. For instance, the case of In re Cellect highlights the importance of ODP analysis and its impact on patent term adjustments[4].

Key Takeaways

  • Understand the Claims: The claims of a patent define its scope and protection.
  • Analyze the Patent Landscape: Use tools like Patent Public Search, Global Dossier, and CCD to identify prior art and related patents.
  • Consider Legal Aspects: Be aware of doctrines like ODP and the impact of PTA on patent expiration dates.
  • Utilize Patent Analytics: Tools like Claim Coverage Matrix and Claim Charts can help in managing and analyzing large numbers of patent claims.
  • Consult Experts: Engage with patent attorneys and other experts to gain deeper insights.

FAQs

Q: What is the importance of claim analysis in patent protection?

A: Claim analysis is crucial because it defines the scope of the invention and what is protected by the patent. It helps in identifying gaps or opportunities in intellectual property protection.

Q: How can I identify prior art relevant to my patent?

A: Use tools like the Patent Public Search, Electronic Official Gazette, and the Common Citation Document (CCD) to search for prior art.

Q: What is Obviousness-Type Double Patenting (ODP)?

A: ODP is a doctrine that prevents an inventor from securing a second, later-expiring patent for an invention covered by a patent that was filed at the same time but has a different patent term due to a grant of PTA.

Q: How does Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) affect the expiration date of a patent?

A: PTA is granted for USPTO delays during prosecution and can extend the term of a patent. However, it does not extend the term past the date of a terminal disclaimer.

Q: What is the role of patent analytics in managing intellectual property?

A: Patent analytics helps in tracking patents by claims and scope concepts, identifying gaps or opportunities in intellectual property protection, and making informed decisions about patent strategy.

Sources

  1. USPTO - Search for patents. Retrieved from https://www.uspto.gov/patents/search
  2. ACUS - U.S. Patent Small Claims Court. Retrieved from https://www.acus.gov/research-projects/us-patent-small-claims-court
  3. SLWIP - Patent Analytics. Retrieved from https://www.slwip.com/services/patent-analytics/
  4. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit - In re Cellect. Retrieved from https://cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions-orders/22-1293.OPINION.8-28-2023_2181381.pdf

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,835,505

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Hq Spclt Pharma ESMOLOL HYDROCHLORIDE DOUBLE STRENGTH IN PLASTIC CONTAINER esmolol hydrochloride SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 205703-002 Apr 7, 2016 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe Y ⤷  Subscribe
Hq Spclt Pharma ESMOLOL HYDROCHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER esmolol hydrochloride SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 205703-001 Apr 7, 2016 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe Y ⤷  Subscribe
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 8,835,505

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2014228155 ⤷  Subscribe
Canada 2906031 ⤷  Subscribe
China 105263809 ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 2948379 ⤷  Subscribe
Japan 2016515513 ⤷  Subscribe
South Korea 20150132835 ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.