You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 8,911,778


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,911,778
Title:Pellet formulation for the treatment of the intestinal tract
Abstract: An orally adminsterable pharmaceutical pellet formulation for the treatment of the intestinal tract is disclosed, which comprises a core and an enteric coating, the core including, as a pharmaceutical active compound, aminosalicylic acid or a pharmaceutically tolerable salt or a derivative thereof.
Inventor(s): Otterbeck; Norbert (Uberlingen, DE), Gruber; Peter (Merzhausen, DE)
Assignee: Dr. Falk Pharma GmbH (Freiburg, DE)
Application Number:13/566,905
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Formulation; Compound; Use; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 8,911,778: A Comprehensive Guide

Introduction to Patent Analysis

When analyzing a patent, understanding its scope and claims is crucial for determining its validity, enforceability, and potential impact on the market. This article will delve into the specifics of United States Patent 8,911,778, providing a detailed analysis of its scope and claims, and contextualizing it within the broader patent landscape.

Understanding Patent Scope

Patent scope is a critical aspect of patent analysis, as it defines the boundaries of what is protected by the patent. The scope is typically determined by the language of the patent claims, which are the legal definitions of the invention[3].

Metrics for Measuring Patent Scope

Research has identified simple metrics to measure patent scope, such as independent claim length and independent claim count. These metrics can indicate the breadth and clarity of the patent claims. For instance, narrower claims are often associated with a higher probability of grant and a shorter examination process[3].

Patent Claims Analysis

Claim Structure

Patent claims are divided into independent and dependent claims. Independent claims stand alone and define the invention, while dependent claims refer back to and further limit the independent claims.

Claim Language

The language used in the claims is pivotal. Broader claims may encompass more variations of the invention but are also more likely to face challenges during the examination process. Narrower claims, while more specific, may offer stronger protection but cover a smaller scope of the invention[3].

Case Study: United States Patent 8,911,778

To analyze the scope and claims of United States Patent 8,911,778, we need to examine the patent document itself.

Patent Title and Abstract

The title and abstract provide an initial overview of the invention. For example, if the patent is titled "Method and System for [Specific Technology]," the abstract will summarize the key aspects of this technology.

Claim Analysis

  • Independent Claims: These claims define the core of the invention. Analyzing their length and complexity can provide insights into the patent's scope.
  • Dependent Claims: These claims further refine the invention by adding additional limitations. They help in understanding the specific embodiments covered by the patent.

Example from Patent 8,911,778

Assuming Patent 8,911,778 is related to a technological innovation, let's consider a hypothetical example:

  • Independent Claim 1: "A method for processing data, comprising: receiving data from a source; analyzing the data using a predefined algorithm; and generating a report based on the analysis."
  • Dependent Claim 2: "The method of claim 1, wherein the predefined algorithm includes a machine learning model."

In this example, Claim 1 defines the broad method, while Claim 2 narrows it down by specifying the use of a machine learning model.

Patent Landscape and Context

Global Patent Trends

The patent landscape is influenced by global trends in innovation and intellectual property protection. For instance, the USPTO awarded 309,000 utility patents in 2018, with a significant portion related to electrical and mechanical engineering[4].

Technology Areas

Patents are classified into various technology areas, such as electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, and computer technology. Understanding which area a patent falls into can help in assessing its relevance and impact within that field[4].

International Comparisons

Patent databases from international offices, such as the European Patent Office (EPO) and the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), provide insights into global patenting trends. This can help in identifying whether similar inventions have been patented in other countries[1].

Tools for Patent Search and Analysis

USPTO Resources

The USPTO offers several tools for patent search and analysis, including the Patent Public Search tool, Global Dossier, and the Common Citation Document (CCD) application. These tools enable users to search prior art, view file histories, and access citation data[1].

Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs)

Local PTRCs provide training in patent search techniques and maintain local search resources, which can be invaluable for detailed patent analysis[1].

Legal and Regulatory Considerations

Patent Examination Process

The patent examination process can significantly impact the scope of patent claims. Research indicates that the examination process tends to narrow the scope of patent claims, making them more specific and potentially stronger[3].

Litigation and Enforcement

The scope and claims of a patent also play a crucial role in litigation and enforcement. Broader claims may be more susceptible to challenges, while narrower claims may offer clearer boundaries for enforcement[5].

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Scope: Defined by the language of the patent claims, with metrics such as independent claim length and count providing insights into the breadth and clarity of the claims.
  • Claim Analysis: Independent claims define the core invention, while dependent claims add specific limitations.
  • Patent Landscape: Understanding global trends, technology areas, and international comparisons is essential for contextualizing a patent.
  • Tools and Resources: Utilizing USPTO resources, PTRCs, and other databases is crucial for thorough patent analysis.
  • Legal Considerations: The examination process and potential litigation highlight the importance of well-defined claims.

FAQs

What is the importance of patent scope in patent analysis?

Patent scope defines the boundaries of what is protected by the patent, influencing its validity, enforceability, and market impact.

How can one measure the scope of a patent?

Metrics such as independent claim length and independent claim count can be used to measure the scope of a patent.

What are the key differences between independent and dependent claims?

Independent claims define the core invention, while dependent claims further limit and specify the invention.

Where can one find resources for patent search and analysis?

Resources include the USPTO's Patent Public Search tool, Global Dossier, PTRCs, and international patent databases.

How does the patent examination process affect the scope of patent claims?

The examination process tends to narrow the scope of patent claims, making them more specific and potentially stronger.

Sources

  1. USPTO - Search for patents: https://www.uspto.gov/patents/search
  2. USA.gov - U.S. Patent and Trademark Office: https://www.usa.gov/agencies/u-s-patent-and-trademark-office
  3. SSRN - Patent Claims and Patent Scope: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2844964
  4. NCSES - Invention: U.S. and Comparative Global Trends: https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20204/invention-u-s-and-comparative-global-trends
  5. US Courts - Report on Filing Patent/Trademark: https://www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/forms/report-filing-patent-trademark

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,911,778

ApplicantTradenameGeneric NameDosageNDAApproval DateTETypeRLDRSPatent No.Patent ExpirationProductSubstanceDelist Req.Patented / Exclusive UseSubmissiondate
No data available in table
>Applicant>Tradename>Generic Name>Dosage>NDA>Approval Date>TE>Type>RLD>RS>Patent No.>Patent Expiration>Product>Substance>Delist Req.>Patented / Exclusive Use>Submissiondate
Showing 0 to 0 of 0 entries

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 8,911,778

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Germany197 32 903Jul 30, 1997

International Family Members for US Patent 8,911,778

CountryPatent NumberEstimated ExpirationSupplementary Protection CertificateSPC CountrySPC Expiration
Austria 241964 ⤷  Try for Free
Canada 2297832 ⤷  Try for Free
Germany 19732903 ⤷  Try for Free
>Country>Patent Number>Estimated Expiration>Supplementary Protection Certificate>SPC Country>SPC Expiration
Showing 1 to 3 of 3 entries

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.