You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 9,006,462


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,006,462
Title:Glycopyrrolate salts
Abstract: Salts of glycopyrrolate, including solid forms and formulations such as topicals thereof, are disclosed. Methods of making glycopyrrolate salts, including formulations such as topicals thereof, and methods of treating hyperhidrosis with salts of glycopyrrolate, and formulations such as topicals thereof, are disclosed.
Inventor(s): Statler; John Allan (Redwood City, CA), Shaw; Anthony Adrian (North Vancouver, CA), Imbert; Delphine Caroline (Cupertino, CA), Nelson; Jennifer Leigh (Kokomo, IN), Andres; Patricia (West Lafayette, IN), McQueen; Lisa Lynn (West Lafayette, IN), Boerrigter; Stephan Xander Mattheus (West Lafayette, IN), Selbo; Jon Gordon (West Lafayette, IN), Andres; Mark Christopher (West Lafayette, IN)
Assignee: Dermira, Inc. (Menlo Park, CA)
Application Number:14/473,537
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Formulation; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 9,006,462: A Comprehensive Guide

Introduction

When delving into the world of patents, understanding the scope and claims of a particular patent is crucial for inventors, businesses, and legal professionals. This article will provide a detailed analysis of the scope and claims of United States Patent 9,006,462, using relevant principles and examples to illustrate key points.

Understanding Patent Scope

Definition and Importance

Patent scope refers to the boundaries of what is protected by a patent. It is defined by the claims of the patent, which must be clear and specific enough to inform those skilled in the art about the invention's limits[3].

Metrics for Measuring Patent Scope

Researchers often use metrics such as independent claim length and independent claim count to measure patent scope. These metrics can indicate the breadth and clarity of the patent claims. For instance, narrower claims at publication are associated with a higher probability of grant and a shorter examination process[3].

The Role of Claims in Patents

Claim Construction and Indefiniteness

Claims are the legal documents that define the scope of protection afforded by a patent. They must be precise enough to afford clear notice of what is claimed, thereby informing the public of what is still open to them. The definiteness requirement mandates clarity while recognizing that absolute precision is unattainable[2].

Legal Standards for Claim Indefiniteness

The courts have established that claim construction is a question of law and receives de novo review on appeal. Claims must be viewed in the context of the specification and the prosecution history to ensure they inform those skilled in the art about the scope of the invention with reasonable certainty[2].

United States Patent 9,006,462: An Overview

Patent Details

While the specific details of United States Patent 9,006,462 are not provided in the sources, we can infer general principles from similar patents and patent analysis.

Claim Structure

Typically, a patent includes multiple claims, each serving a specific purpose:

  • Independent Claims: These define the broadest scope of the invention.
  • Dependent Claims: These narrow down the scope by adding additional limitations to the independent claims.

Claim Language and Clarity

The language used in the claims is critical. It must be clear and specific to avoid indefiniteness. For example, the Supreme Court has emphasized that a patent must be precise enough to afford clear notice of what is claimed, thereby ‘appris[ing] the public of what is still open to them’[2].

Analyzing the Claims of a Patent

Independent Claim Analysis

Independent claims are the cornerstone of a patent's scope. They should be broad enough to cover the invention but not so broad as to be indefinite. Here’s an example of how to analyze an independent claim:

Claim 1: A method for treating respiratory complaints, comprising administering a co-crystal of glycopyrronium bromide and lactose in a stoichiometric ratio of from about 1:2 to 2:1.

In this example, the claim defines a method involving a specific co-crystal composition, which is a clear and specific boundary.

Dependent Claim Analysis

Dependent claims build upon the independent claims by adding additional limitations. These claims help to further define the scope and can provide additional protection.

Claim 2: The method of claim 1, wherein the co-crystal is administered via an inhaler.

This dependent claim narrows down the method by specifying the administration route, providing more detail and clarity.

Patent Landscape and Trends

Patent Application and Grant Trends

The patent landscape is dynamic, with trends indicating that narrower claims at publication are associated with a higher probability of grant and a shorter examination process. This suggests that clarity and specificity in claims are highly valued by patent offices[3].

Sector-Specific Patent Analysis

In sectors like hydrogen and fuel cell technologies, patent analysis reveals a significant number of patents related to fuel cells, production, delivery, and storage. This indicates a high level of innovation and competition in these areas, where clear and specific claims are essential for distinguishing inventions[4].

Legal Implications and Disputes

Claim Construction Hearings

In cases of disputes, claim construction hearings (Markman hearings) are held to determine the meaning and scope of the claims. These hearings are crucial in resolving ambiguities and ensuring that the claims are not indefinite[2].

Appeal Processes

If a district court's decision on claim indefiniteness is appealed, the appellate court reviews the claim construction de novo. This ensures that the legal standard for claim indefiniteness is correctly applied, as seen in cases like Nature Simulation Systems Inc. v. Autodesk, Inc.[2].

Practical Considerations for Inventors and Businesses

Drafting Clear Claims

Inventors and businesses must ensure that their patent claims are drafted with clarity and specificity. This involves careful consideration of the independent and dependent claims to ensure they define the invention clearly without being overly broad.

Understanding the Prosecution History

The prosecution history, including any amendments or arguments made during the patent application process, is crucial in understanding the scope of the claims. This history can provide context and help in interpreting the claims[2].

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Scope Definition: Defined by the claims, which must be clear and specific.
  • Claim Metrics: Independent claim length and count can measure patent scope.
  • Claim Construction: Must be precise and viewed in the context of the specification and prosecution history.
  • Legal Standards: Claims must afford clear notice of what is claimed to avoid indefiniteness.
  • Sector Trends: Narrower claims are associated with higher grant probabilities and shorter examination processes.
  • Legal Implications: Clear claims are essential for resolving disputes and ensuring patent validity.

FAQs

What is the importance of patent scope in a patent?

Patent scope is crucial as it defines the boundaries of what is protected by the patent, informing those skilled in the art about the invention's limits.

How are patent claims constructed to avoid indefiniteness?

Claims must be precise enough to afford clear notice of what is claimed, viewed in the context of the specification and prosecution history.

What metrics are used to measure patent scope?

Independent claim length and independent claim count are simple metrics used to measure patent scope.

Why are narrower claims preferred in patent applications?

Narrower claims are associated with a higher probability of grant and a shorter examination process, indicating clarity and specificity are valued.

What is the role of the prosecution history in interpreting patent claims?

The prosecution history provides context and helps in interpreting the claims, including any amendments or arguments made during the patent application process.

Sources

  1. US Patent Application No. 10662152 - Crystalline co-crystals of glycopyrronium bromide with lactose.
  2. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT - Nature Simulation Systems Inc. v. Autodesk, Inc.
  3. Patent Claims and Patent Scope - SSRN paper on metrics for measuring patent scope.
  4. hfto-2021-patent-analysis.pdf - Department of Energy patent analysis for hydrogen and fuel cell technologies.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,006,462

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 9,006,462

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2014223172 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 2016269524 ⤷  Subscribe
Canada 2902795 ⤷  Subscribe
China 105026369 ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 2961734 ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.