You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 21, 2025

Details for Patent: 9,018,204


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,018,204
Title:2,4-pyrimidinediamine compounds and their uses
Abstract: The present invention provides 2,4-pyrimidinediamine compounds that inhibit the IgE and/or IgG receptor signaling cascades that lead to the release of chemical mediators, intermediates and methods of synthesizing the compounds and methods of using the compounds in a variety of contexts, including in the treatment and prevention of diseases characterized by, caused by or associated with the release of chemical mediators via degranulation and other processes effected by activation of the IgE and/or IgG receptor signaling cascades.
Inventor(s): Singh; Rajinder (Belmont, CA), Argade; Ankush (Foster City, CA), Payan; Donald (Hillsborough, CA), Molineaux; Susan (South San Francisco, CA), Holland; Sacha (San Francisco, CA), Clough; Jeffrey (Redwood City, CA), Keim; Holger (Irvine, CA), Bhamidipati; Somasekhar (Foster City, CA), Sylvain; Catherine (San Mateo, CA), Li; Hui (Santa Clara, CA), Rossi; Alexander (Reedsport, OR)
Assignee: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (South San Francisco, CA)
Application Number:14/594,862
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 9,018,204: A Comprehensive Analysis

Introduction

When analyzing a patent, it is crucial to delve into its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape to understand its significance and implications. This article will provide a detailed analysis of United States Patent 9,018,204, focusing on its claims, the legal framework, and the tools and resources available for patent research.

Patent Overview

Patent Number and Title

United States Patent 9,018,204 is a specific patent that, like all patents, has a unique title and description. To analyze this patent, one would typically start by identifying the title, inventors, and the assignee.

Inventors and Assignee

The inventors and the assignee are critical pieces of information as they indicate the creators and the owners of the patent. This information can be found in the patent document itself or through patent search databases like the USPTO's Patent Public Search tool[1].

Claims Analysis

Understanding Patent Claims

Patent claims define the scope of the invention and are the most critical part of a patent. They outline what the inventor considers to be the novel and non-obvious aspects of the invention. For U.S. Patent 9,018,204, the claims would need to be carefully examined to understand the exact scope of protection.

Types of Claims

There are different types of claims, including independent and dependent claims. Independent claims stand alone and define the invention, while dependent claims refer back to and further limit the independent claims. Analyzing these claims helps in understanding the hierarchical structure of the patent's protection[3].

Claim Construction

Claim construction is the process of interpreting the meaning of the claims. This is often a critical step in patent litigation and can significantly impact the scope of the patent. The Federal Circuit has established guidelines for claim construction, emphasizing the importance of understanding the claims in the context of the specification and the prosecution history[5].

Legal Framework

35 U.S.C. § 112: Written Description and Enablement

The claims must comply with 35 U.S.C. § 112, which requires that the specification contain a written description of the invention and enable one skilled in the art to make and use the invention. This section is crucial for ensuring that the patentee has fully disclosed the invention and that the claims are supported by the specification[5].

35 U.S.C. § 251: Reissue Patents

If the patentee seeks to broaden the scope of the claims through a reissue patent, they must comply with 35 U.S.C. § 251, which requires that the reissue claims be directed to the invention disclosed in the original patent. This prevents the patentee from expanding the scope of the claims beyond what was originally disclosed[5].

Patent Landscape

Prior Art and Citation Data

Understanding the prior art and citation data is essential for placing the patent within the broader patent landscape. Tools like the Common Citation Document (CCD) and Patent Public Search can provide insights into the prior art cited by various patent offices, helping to identify the novelty and non-obviousness of the invention[1].

Global Dossier

The Global Dossier service allows users to access the file histories of related applications from participating IP Offices, providing a comprehensive view of the patent family and related applications. This can help in understanding how the patent fits into the global intellectual property landscape[1].

Tools and Resources for Patent Research

USPTO Patent Public Search

The USPTO's Patent Public Search tool is a powerful resource for searching patents and published patent applications. It offers two modern interfaces that enhance access to prior art and improve the overall patent searching process[1].

Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs)

PTRCs provide local search resources and may offer training in patent search techniques. These centers are invaluable for those new to patent searching or needing specialized assistance[1].

Patent Claims Research Dataset

The Patent Claims Research Dataset, provided by the USPTO, contains detailed information on claims from U.S. patents and patent applications. This dataset can be used to analyze trends and statistics related to patent claims, offering insights into the scope and complexity of patents[3].

Conducting a Preliminary Patent Search

Step-by-Step Strategy

Conducting a preliminary patent search involves several steps, including identifying the relevant classification, searching prior art, and analyzing the results. The USPTO provides a web-based tutorial and a multi-step strategy handout to guide users through this process[1].

Using Multiple Databases

Utilizing multiple databases such as PatFT, AppFT, and Espacenet can provide a comprehensive view of the patent landscape. Each database has its unique features and coverage, making them useful for different aspects of patent research[4].

Case Law and Legal Precedents

Federal Circuit Decisions

Decisions from the Federal Circuit, such as the case involving Float‘N’Grill LLC, provide valuable insights into how patent claims are interpreted and the legal standards applied. These decisions help in understanding the nuances of patent law and how claims are constructed and enforced[5].

Practical Considerations

Patent Assignment and Ownership

Changes in patent ownership can be tracked using the Patent Assignment Search website. Understanding the current ownership and any changes in ownership is crucial for licensing, litigation, and other legal purposes[1].

Patent Examination Data System (PEDS)

The PEDS allows public users to search, view, and download bibliographic data for all publicly available patent applications. This system is useful for analyzing the status and history of patent applications[1].

Key Takeaways

  • Claims Analysis: Carefully examine the claims to understand the scope of the patent.
  • Legal Framework: Ensure compliance with relevant sections of the U.S. patent law, such as 35 U.S.C. § 112 and § 251.
  • Patent Landscape: Use tools like the CCD and Global Dossier to understand the prior art and global patent family.
  • Research Tools: Utilize resources like the USPTO's Patent Public Search and PTRCs for comprehensive patent research.
  • Case Law: Refer to Federal Circuit decisions for legal precedents on claim construction and enforcement.

FAQs

What is the importance of claim construction in patent law?

Claim construction is crucial as it determines the scope of the patent and can significantly impact patent litigation. It involves interpreting the meaning of the claims in the context of the specification and the prosecution history[5].

How can I search for prior art related to a specific patent?

You can use tools like the USPTO's Patent Public Search, the Common Citation Document (CCD), and other databases such as PatFT and Espacenet to search for prior art related to a specific patent[1][4].

What is the Global Dossier service, and how is it useful?

The Global Dossier service provides access to the file histories of related applications from participating IP Offices, allowing users to see the patent family, dossier, classification, and citation data for these applications. This service helps in understanding the global patent landscape[1].

How do I conduct a preliminary patent search?

Conducting a preliminary patent search involves identifying the relevant classification, searching prior art, and analyzing the results. The USPTO provides a web-based tutorial and a multi-step strategy handout to guide users through this process[1].

What is the Patent Claims Research Dataset, and what does it contain?

The Patent Claims Research Dataset contains detailed information on claims from U.S. patents granted between 1976 and 2014 and U.S. patent applications published between 2001 and 2014. It includes individually-parsed claims, claim-level statistics, and document-level statistics[3].

Sources

  1. USPTO - Search for patents. Retrieved from https://www.uspto.gov/patents/search
  2. ACUS - U.S. Patent Small Claims Court. Retrieved from https://www.acus.gov/research-projects/us-patent-small-claims-court
  3. USPTO - Patent Claims Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://www.uspto.gov/ip-policy/economic-research/research-datasets/patent-claims-research-dataset
  4. Harvard Business School - Patent search: A comparative table of databases. Retrieved from https://asklib.library.hbs.edu/faq/266950
  5. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit - In Re FLOAT'N'GRILL LLC. Retrieved from https://cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions-orders/22-1438.OPINION.7-12-2023_2156183.pdf

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,018,204

ApplicantTradenameGeneric NameDosageNDAApproval DateTETypeRLDRSPatent No.Patent ExpirationProductSubstanceDelist Req.Patented / Exclusive UseSubmissiondate
No data available in table
>Applicant>Tradename>Generic Name>Dosage>NDA>Approval Date>TE>Type>RLD>RS>Patent No.>Patent Expiration>Product>Substance>Delist Req.>Patented / Exclusive Use>Submissiondate
Showing 0 to 0 of 0 entries

International Family Members for US Patent 9,018,204

CountryPatent NumberEstimated ExpirationSupplementary Protection CertificateSPC CountrySPC Expiration
Australia 2003208931 ⤷  Try for Free
Australia 2003265336 ⤷  Try for Free
Australia 2008252053 ⤷  Try for Free
Austria 451104 ⤷  Try for Free
Austria 524184 ⤷  Try for Free
Brazil 0307355 ⤷  Try for Free
>Country>Patent Number>Estimated Expiration>Supplementary Protection Certificate>SPC Country>SPC Expiration
Showing 1 to 6 of 6 entries

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.